The Internet and Citizen Communication With Government: Does the Medium Matter?

The Internet offers a new means by which citizens may contact government to express their views or concerns, and it raises interesting empirical and theoretical questions about whether citizen contacts are affected by communication media. This article uses survey data to explore hypotheses about whether means of communication shape contacting activity. It compares Internet-based contacts with traditional contacts, showing statistically significant but for the most part substantively small differences. Effects of technology are of two kinds, those affecting only the likelihood of citizens being active in communicating with government and those affecting the frequency or intensity of communication among those who are active. The article discusses these findings in terms of transitional effects of technology, which arise from uneven distribution of the technology in society, and in terms of inherent effects, which attend to the technology itself. The most important inherent effects involve gender and politic...

[1]  N. Nie,et al.  Participation in America : Political Democracy and Social Equality , 1972 .

[2]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Bureaucratic Response to Citizen-Initiated Contacts: Environmental Enforcement in Detroit , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[3]  N. Nie,et al.  Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison , 1978 .

[4]  Citizen Contacts with Local Governments: A Comparative View , 1980 .

[5]  E. Sharp Citizen-Initiated Contacting of Government Officials and Socioeconomic Status: Determining the Relationship and Accounting for It , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[6]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  Citizen-initiated Contacts with Government Agencies: A Test of Three Theories , 1982 .

[7]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[8]  Darrell M. West,et al.  The Political Bases of Citizen Contacting: A Cross-National Analysis , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[9]  J. Wajcman Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[10]  There's a Madness in the Method , 1992 .

[11]  Eileen Green,et al.  Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems. Gender and Society: Feminist Perspectives on the Past and Present Series. , 1993 .

[12]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America , 1993 .

[13]  Tjeerd Plomp,et al.  Some gender issues in educational computer use: results of an international comparative survey , 1993 .

[14]  H. Rheingold A slice of life in my virtual community , 1993 .

[15]  Steven G. Jones CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community , 1994 .

[16]  Nancy Burns,et al.  Gender and the Pathways to Participation: The Role of Resources , 1994, Journal of Politics.

[17]  J. Webster What Do We Know About Gender and Information Technology at Work? , 1995 .

[18]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[19]  N. Ford,et al.  Gender differences in Internet perceptions and use , 1996 .

[20]  D. Porter Internet Culture , 1996 .

[21]  S. Schneider Creating a Democratic Public Sphere Through Political Discussion , 1996 .

[22]  The Network and the Fragmentation of the Public Sphere , 1996 .

[23]  Tjeerd Plomp,et al.  Information technology and gender equality: A contradiction in terminis? , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[24]  A. Colley,et al.  The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes , 1997 .

[25]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Communities: Virtual vs. Real , 1997, Science.