Online and Offline Representations of Biocultural Diversity: A Political Ecology Perspective on Nature-Based Tourism and Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Pantanal

The concept of biocultural diversity is confronted with contemporary changes that impact on local communities, such as globalization and digital transformations. Engaging the conceptual flexibility of ‘biocultural diversity’, we studied nature-based tourism at the intersection of indigenous communities and the digital realm. We employed a political ecology perspective to examine online and offline representations of biocultural diversity in the Brazilian Pantanal, one of the biggest wetlands in the world, and home to groups of peoples known as the Pantaneiros. Data from interviews with 48 stakeholders in the tourist sector were structured along three ‘myths’—the Uncivilised, Unrestrained, and Unchanged—for which we have also constructed counter narratives. Each myth denoted the primacy of biodiversity, and ignored broader dimensions of the Pantanal as a bioculturally diverse landscape. The relationships of the Pantaneiros with their environment were found to be intricate and had clear repercussions for tourism, but ironically, reference to the Pantaneiro culture in nature-based tourism was superficial. Moreover, thriving on the myths, this form of tourism perpetuates skewed power structures and social inequalities. Lower-class Pantaneiros likely suffer most from this. We recommend stakeholder engagement with a biocultural design that facilitates the integration of other-than-biodiversity values, and that thereby promotes sustainability of the entire social-ecological system.

[1]  A. Escobar Construction nature: Elements for a post-structuralist political ecology , 1996 .

[2]  Dolores M. Frías-Jamilena,et al.  The contribution of website design to the generation of tourist destination image: The moderating effect of involvement , 2015 .

[3]  S. Stepchenkova,et al.  Ecotourism experiences reported online: Classification of satisfaction attributes , 2012 .

[4]  A. Vayda,et al.  Against Political Ecology , 1999 .

[5]  Anne-Mette Hjalager,et al.  Innovation patterns in sustainable tourism: An analytical typology , 1997 .

[6]  P. Crawshaw,et al.  Human–Wildlife Conflicts in Brazil: A Fast-Growing Issue , 2015 .

[7]  Laura R. Graham,et al.  The Shifting Middle Ground: Amazonian Indians and Eco-Politics , 2009 .

[8]  M. Cocks,et al.  Reappraising the Concept of Biocultural Diversity: a Perspective from South Africa , 2014 .

[9]  R. van der Wal,et al.  New Technological Interventions in Conservation Conflicts: Countering Emotions and Contested Knowledge , 2017, Human ecology: an interdisciplinary journal.

[10]  Takaaki Nihei,et al.  Ecotourism in the North Pantanal, Brazil , 2005 .

[11]  S. Hinchliffe,et al.  Reconstituting nature conservation: Towards a careful political ecology , 2008 .

[12]  T. Jung,et al.  The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: the case of a Korean theme park. , 2015 .

[13]  A. Wiley,et al.  What Do Anthropologists Mean When They Use the Term Biocultural , 2016 .

[14]  R. Wal,et al.  Common stories of reintroduction: A discourse analysis of documents supporting animal reintroductions to Scotland , 2012 .

[15]  M. Willig,et al.  Underuse of social-ecological systems: A research agenda for addressing challenges to biocultural diversity , 2018 .

[16]  R. van der Wal,et al.  The Promise of Wilderness Between Paradise and Hell: A Cultural-Historical Exploration of a Dutch National Park , 2012 .

[17]  Emery Roe,et al.  Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development , 1991 .

[18]  L. Maffi Biocultural Diversity and Sustainability , 2007 .

[19]  J. Gottgens,et al.  The Paraguay-Paraná Hidrovía: Protecting the Pantanal with Lessons from the Past , 2001 .

[20]  D. Brockington,et al.  Capitalism and Conservation: The Production and Reproduction of Biodiversity Conservation , 2010 .

[21]  Mary Theresa Bonhage-Freund Against Extinction. The Story of Conservation , 2005 .

[22]  Rajesh Kasturirangan,et al.  In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age , 2017 .

[23]  Bruce J. Doran,et al.  Indigenous biocultural knowledge in ecosystem science and management : review and insight from Australia , 2015 .

[24]  W. L. Hijweege,et al.  Governing biocultural diversity in mosaic landscapes , 2012 .

[25]  R. Keenan,et al.  Delocalizing Communities: Changing Forms of Community Engagement in Natural Resources Governance , 2016 .

[26]  N. Leader‐Williams,et al.  Cattle ranchers' attitudes to conflicts with jaguar Panthera onca in the Pantanal of Brazil , 2005, Oryx.

[27]  Carmen Berné,et al.  The effect of ICT on relationship enhancement and performance in tourism channels , 2015 .

[28]  Ana Carolina de Oliveira Neves Conservation of the pantanal wetlands: the definitive moment for decision making. , 2009, Ambio.

[29]  Ana Isabel Jiménez-Zarco,et al.  A multidimensional analysis of the information sources construct and its relevance for destination image formation , 2015 .

[30]  D. V. D. M. Ruschmann Ecological tourism in Brazil , 1992 .

[31]  René van der Wal,et al.  Microscope and spectacle: On the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation , 2015, Ambio.

[32]  N. Nakagoshi,et al.  Competitiveness as an Indicator of Sustainable Development of Tourism: Applying Destination Competitiveness Indicators to Ethiopia , 2014 .

[33]  F. Azevedo,et al.  Perceptions of ranchers towards livestock predation by large felids in the Brazilian Pantanal , 2014, Wildlife Research.

[34]  Timothy D. Baird,et al.  Mobile Phone Use and Human–Wildlife Conflict in Northern Tanzania , 2016, Environmental Management.

[35]  W. Junk,et al.  Towards a sustainable management concept for ecosystem services of the Pantanal wetland , 2008 .

[36]  A. Escobar Whose Knowledge, Whose nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements , 1998 .

[37]  I. Vaccaro,et al.  Political ecology and conservation policies: some theoretical genealogies , 2013 .

[38]  C. Alho,et al.  A conservation agenda for the Pantanal's biodiversity. , 2011, Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia.

[39]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice , 2007 .

[40]  J. Martin-Ortega,et al.  Applying a ‘Value Landscapes Approach’ to Conflicts in Water Governance: The Case of the Paraguay-Paraná Waterway , 2017 .

[41]  C. Alho Biodiversity of the Pantanal: its magnitude, human occupation, environmental threats and challenges for conservation. , 2011, Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia.

[42]  E. Turnhout The politics of environmental knowledge , 2018 .

[43]  New Interest in Wild Forest Products in Europe as an Expression of Biocultural Dynamics , 2017, Human ecology: an interdisciplinary journal.

[44]  P. Frederick,et al.  Stakeholders' Perceptions of a Wading Bird Colony as a Community Resource in the Brazilian Pantanal , 2003 .

[45]  Brock Bersaglio,et al.  Furthering post-human political ecologies , 2018, Geoforum.

[46]  J. Igoe The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation , 2010 .

[47]  Svetlana Stepchenkova,et al.  Effect of tourist photographs on attitudes towards destination: Manifest and latent content , 2015 .

[48]  Matilde Cordoba Azcarate Between Local and Global, Discourses and Practices: Rethinking Ecotourism Development in Celestún (Yucatán, México) , 2006 .

[49]  A. C. Neves Conservation of the Pantanal Wetlands: The Definitive Moment for Decision Making , 2009 .

[50]  W. Junk,et al.  Pantanal: a large South American wetland at a crossroads , 2005 .

[51]  W. Adams,et al.  Digital technology and the conservation of nature , 2015, Ambio.

[52]  Regina Maria G. Silva,et al.  Between the remnants of colonialism and the insurgence of self-narrative in constructing participatory social maps: towards a land education methodology , 2014 .

[53]  E. Cater Ecotourism as a Western Construct , 2006 .

[54]  Mehmet Mehmetoglu,et al.  Typologising nature-based tourists by activity—Theoretical and practical implications , 2007 .

[55]  M. Cocks Biocultural Diversity: Moving Beyond the Realm of ‘Indigenous’ and ‘Local’ People , 2006 .

[56]  Bing Pan,et al.  The power of search engine ranking for tourist destinations , 2015 .

[57]  Kati Vierikko,et al.  Governing cities reflexively—The biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services , 2016 .

[58]  Eleanor J. Sterling,et al.  The Intersections of Biological Diversity and Cultural Diversity: Towards Integration , 2009 .

[59]  Joao dos Santos Vila da Silva,et al.  Cattle ranching and deforestation in the Brazilian Pantanal , 2001 .

[60]  J. Martin-Ortega,et al.  Prospects for Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Pantanal: A Scenario Analysis , 2015 .

[61]  A. Stronza,et al.  Anthropology of Tourism: Forging New Ground for Ecotourism and Other Alternatives , 2001 .

[62]  P. Girard,et al.  Turismo, desenvolvimento e saberes no Pantanal: diálogos e parcerias possíveis * Tourism, development and knowledge in Pantanal: Possible dialogues and partnerships , 2008 .

[63]  A. Pott,et al.  Features and conservation of the Brazilian Pantanal wetland , 2004, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[64]  Andrew Seidl,et al.  Participatory research methods in environmental science: local and scientific knowledge of a limnological phenomenon in the Pantanal wetland of Brazil , 2000 .

[65]  S. Hudson,et al.  The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attendees , 2015 .

[66]  C. Alho,et al.  Environmental Degradation in the Pantanal EcosystemIn Brazil, the world's largest wetland is being threatened by human activities , 1988 .

[67]  C. Silva,et al.  New challenges in the management of the Brazilian Pantanal and catchment area , 2005, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[68]  Jon Hutton,et al.  People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation , 2007 .

[69]  A. Ioris Rethinking Brazil’s Pantanal Wetland , 2013 .

[70]  A. Ioris,et al.  The Paradox of Water Abundance in Mato Grosso, Brazil , 2017 .

[71]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents , 2015 .

[72]  U. Eser Ethical perspectives on the preservation of biocultural diversity , 2009 .

[73]  F. Berkes,et al.  Effective Biodiversity Conservation Requires Dynamic, Pluralistic, Partnership-Based Approaches , 2018 .

[74]  A. Mead,et al.  Biocultural Design: A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development in Rural Indigenous and Local Communities , 2012 .

[75]  M. Piedade,et al.  Ecological oversight: Brazil's forest code puts wetlands at risk , 2011, Nature.

[76]  F. Berkes,et al.  Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[77]  R. Hill,et al.  Empowering Indigenous peoples’ biocultural diversity through World Heritage cultural landscapes: a case study from the Australian humid tropical forests , 2011 .

[78]  Charlotte M. Echtner,et al.  The Context of Third World Tourism Marketing , 2003 .