Effects ofmechanicalmassage, manuallymphatic drainage and connective tissuemanipulation techniqueson fat massin women with cellulite

Objective To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three different noninvasive treatment techniques on fat mass and regional fat thickness of the patients with cellulites. Methods Sixty subjects were randomized into three groups. Group 1 (n ¼ 20) treated with mechanical massage (MM), group 2 (n ¼ 20) treated with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) and group 3 (n ¼ 20) treated with connective tissue manipulation (CTM) techniques. Subjects were evaluated by using standardized photographs, body composition analyzer (TBF 300) (body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), fat %, fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM), total body water (TBW)), circumference measurement from thigh, waist-hip ratio (WHR), fat thickness measurements from abdomen, suprailium and thigh regions with skin fold caliper. Results All groups had an improvement in thinning of the subcutaneous fat after the treatment (P < 0.05). Thigh circumference decreased by an average of 0.5 cm in all groups and thigh fat thickness decreased 1.66 mm in Group 1, 2.21 mm in Group 2 and 3.03 mm in Group 3. Abdomen and suprailium fat thicknesses decreased 2.4 and 2.58 mm in Group 1, 1.78 and 2 mm in Group 2 and 1.23 and 0.64 mm in Group 3, respectively. The mean difference in waist-hip ratio was 0.1 cm in all groups. Conclusion Allthe treatmenttechniquesare effectiveindecreasingthe regional fatvaluesofthe patientswithcellulites.

[1]  M. Lafontan,et al.  Use of the microdialysis technique to assess lipolytic responsiveness of femoral adipose tissue after 12 sessions of mechanical massage technique , 2008, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[2]  N. Sadick,et al.  A study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Velasmooth™ system in the treatment of cellulite , 2007, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[3]  R. Wickett,et al.  Effect of Weight Loss on Cellulite: Gynoid Lypodystrophy , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  F. Distante,et al.  Efficacy of a multifunctional plant complex in the treatment of the so‐called ‘cellulite’: clinical and instrumental evaluation , 2006, International journal of cosmetic science.

[5]  M. Avram Cellulite: a review of its physiology and treatment , 2004, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[6]  L. Nanney,et al.  Analysis of the effects of deep mechanical massage in the porcine model. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  A. Vergnanini,et al.  Cellulite: a review , 2000, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[8]  D. Sharpe,et al.  Cellulite treatment: a myth or reality: a prospective randomized, controlled trial of two therapies, endermologie and aminophylline cream. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  M. Boschmann,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the morphology and biochemistry of cellulite. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  P. Chang,et al.  Noninvasive Mechanical Body Contouring: (Endermologie) A One-Year Clinical Outcome Study Update , 1998, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[11]  R. Ersek,et al.  Noninvasive Mechanical Body Contouring: A Preliminary Clinical Outcome Study , 1997, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[12]  F. Nürnberger,et al.  So-called cellulite: an invented disease. , 1978, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[13]  M. Ebner Connective tissue massage. , 1965, Physiotherapy.