Experience and design recommendations for picture archiving and communication systems in the surgical setting

An analysis of the efficacy of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in the surgical domain was undertaken at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Interviews with surgeons and staff were conducted and supplemented by direct radiologist observation in the operating room (OR) and surgical outpatient clinic to determine patterns of routine clinical PACS use, levels of satisfaction both within and outside of the OR, and perceptions of the relative efficacy of the system in comparison to film. These data as well as suggestions from the surgical staff members were used to make recommendations for specific modifications in PACS design and operation to improve the current system and to help prescribe design improvements for future PAC systems. A high level of satisfaction with the system was found and the use of PACS was favored over film by a majority of surgeons and their staff. Findings of this study suggest that the design of a hospital-wide PAC system must have the flexibility to accommodate the specific requirements of a wide variety of end-users in their unique hospital environments.

[1]  R E Koehler,et al.  Picture archiving communication systems in the intensive care unit. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  Kiyoshi Kaneda,et al.  The practical use and evaluation of picture archiving and communication system in the department of orthopaedic surgery , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  T Kozuka,et al.  Development and evaluation of oral reporting system for PACS. , 1994, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[4]  S M Pizer,et al.  Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  E. L. Siegel.  Impact of filmless radiology on the Baltimore VA Medical Center , 1995, Proceedings of the National Forum: Military Telemedicine On-Line Today Research, Practice, and Opportunities.

[6]  J. Cameron,et al.  The influence of ambient and viewbox light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph. , 1982, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Eliot L. Siegel,et al.  PACS in the operating room: experience at the Baltimore VA Medical Center , 1995, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Image Management and Communication (IMAC 95).

[8]  M. Urban,et al.  Filmless digital radiology--feasibility and 20 month experience in clinical routine. , 1994, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[9]  W Huda,et al.  Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS). , 1994, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[10]  S C Horii,et al.  Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  C Kuroda,et al.  Small PACS for digital medical images--reliability and security in a clinical setting. , 1994, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[12]  H K Huang,et al.  Integration of a voice processor machine in a PACS. , 1993, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[13]  Siegel El.  Hospital takes plunge into full-fledged PACS. , 1993 .

[14]  Gordon Gamsu,et al.  Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) , 2003, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[15]  N H Strickland,et al.  Default display arrangements of images on PACS monitors. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Eliot L. Siegel,et al.  Making filmless radiology work , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[17]  D Gur,et al.  Requirements for PACS: users' perspective. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.