Geophysical approaches to the classification, delineation and monitoring of marine habitats and their communities

1. If marine environments are to be systematically protected from the adverse effects of human activities, then identification of the types of marine habitats and the communities they contain, and delineation of their boundaries utilizing a consistent classification is required. Human impacts on defined communities can then be assessed, the ‘health’ of these communities can be monitored, and marine protected areas can be designated as appropriate. 2. Schemes to classify habitats at local and regional scales, according to their geophysical properties, may identify different factors as determinants, and/or use them in different sequences in a hierarchical classification. We examined the reasons for these differences in local and regional applications of a global concept, and argue that a common set of factors could be applied in a defined and defensible sequence to produce a common hierarchy of habitat types among geographic regions. 3. We show how simple mapping and GIS techniques, based on readily available data, can lead to the identification of representative habitat types over broad geographic regions. We applied a geophysical framework first to the entire Canadian coastline and second to the Scotian Shelf of Atlantic Canada to establish broad scale marine natural regions and ‘seascapes’, respectively. This ecosystem level approach — which defines representative habitat types — is a fundamental prerequisite for many purposes. It can form the basis for further analyses including: definition of community types from habitat — community relationships; evaluation of the potential roles of focal species in marine conservation; evaluation of candidate marine protected areas; definition of unaffected reference areas against which the effects of human activities can be gauged; guidance for water quality monitoring studies; management of marine resources. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Wildish Factors controlling marine and estuarine sublittoral macrofauna , 1977, Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen.

[2]  T. Platt,et al.  Primary production of arctic waters , 2004, Polar Biology.

[3]  J. Roff,et al.  Frameworks for marine conservation — non‐hierarchical approaches and distinctive habitats , 2002 .

[4]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Explanations of patterns of intertidal diversity at regional scales , 2001 .

[5]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Use of focal species in marine conservation and management: a review and critique , 2001 .

[6]  M. Zacharias,et al.  A Hierarchical Ecological Approach to Conserving Marine Biodiversity , 2000 .

[7]  Growth variation and water mass associations of larval silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis) on the Scotian Shelf , 2000 .

[8]  Mark E. Taylor,et al.  National frameworks for marine conservation — a hierarchical geophysical approach , 2000 .

[9]  Edwin D. Grosholz,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF A NONINDIGENOUS MARINE PREDATOR IN A CALIFORNIA BAY , 2000 .

[10]  R. Scheibling,et al.  Destructive grazing, epiphytism, and disease: the dynamics of sea urchin - kelp interactions in Nova Scotia , 1999 .

[11]  A. Longhurst Ecological Geography of the Sea , 1998 .

[12]  D. Simberloff Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .

[13]  J. Harper,et al.  The British Columbia marine ecosystem classification: Rationale, development, and verification , 1998 .

[14]  W. Bowen,et al.  Role of marine mammals in aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[15]  D. W. Connor,et al.  The effect of sublethal predation on the biology of echinoderms , 1997 .

[16]  R. Warwick,et al.  Relearning the ABC: taxonomic changes and abundance/biomass relationships in disturbed benthic communities , 1994 .

[17]  E. Bourget,et al.  Shore topography and spatial partitioning of crevice refuges by sessile epibenthos in an ice disturbed environment , 1986 .

[18]  J. Roff,et al.  Production Estimates for Scotian Shelf Copepods Based on Mass Specific P/B Ratios , 1983 .

[19]  J. Roff Community Gradients in the Scotian Shelf Zooplankton , 1983 .

[20]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[21]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Atlantic Herring: Stock Discreteness and Abundance , 1982, Science.

[22]  R. Pingree Mixing and Stabilization of Phytoplankton Distributions on the Northwest European Continental Shelf , 1978 .