Distance, shape and more: recognition of object features during active electrolocation in a weakly electric fish

SUMMARY In the absence of light, the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii detects and distinguishes objects in the environment through active electrolocation. In order to test which features of an object the fish use under these conditions to discriminate between differently shaped objects, we trained eight individuals in a food-rewarded, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. All fish learned to discriminate between two objects of different shapes and volumes. When new object combinations were offered in non-rewarded test trials, fish preferred those objects that resembled the one they had been trained to (S+) and avoided objects resembling the one that had not been rewarded (S–). For a decision, fish paid attention to the relative differences between the two objects they had to discriminate. For discrimination, fish used several object features, the most important ones being volume, material and shape. The importance of shape was demonstrated by reducing the objects to their 3-dimensional contours, which sufficed for the fish to distinguish differently shaped objects. Our results also showed that fish attended strongly to the feature `volume', because all individuals tended to avoid the larger one of two objects. When confronted with metal versus plastic objects, all fish avoided metal and preferred plastic objects, irrespective of training. In addition to volume, material and shape, fish attended to additional parameters, such as corners or rounded edges. When confronted with two unknown objects, fish weighed up the positive and negative properties of these novel objects and based their decision on the outcome of this comparison. Our results suggest that fish are able to link and assemble local features of an electrolocation pattern to construct a representation of an object, suggesting that some form of a feature extraction mechanism enables them to solve a complex object recognition task.

[1]  G. von der Emde,et al.  Non-visual environmental imaging and object detection through active electrolocation in weakly electric fish. , 2006, Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology.

[2]  G. Emde,et al.  Finding food: senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish gnathonemus petersii , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Perception of electric properties of objects in electrolocating weakly electric fish: two-dimensional similarity scaling reveals a City-Block metric , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Théophile Ohlmann,et al.  Fish Perform Spatial Pattern Recognition and Abstraction by Exclusive Use of Active Electrolocation , 2004, Current Biology.

[5]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Theoretical and experimental approaches to spatial aspects of electrolocation , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[6]  R. Budelli,et al.  Peripheral electrosensory imaging by weakly electric fish , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  James M. Bower,et al.  Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 1995 , 1996 .

[8]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance discrimination during active electrolocation in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[10]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  G. Rehkämper,et al.  Categorization of multidimensional geometrical figures by chickens (Gallus gallus f. domestica): fit of basic assumptions from exemplar, feature and prototype theory , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[12]  Carl D. Hopkins,et al.  Passive Electrolocation and the Sensory Guidance of Oriented Behavior , 2005 .

[13]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  Template-matching describes visual pattern-recognition tasks in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Brian Rasnow,et al.  Imaging with electricity: how weakly electric fish might perceive objects , 1997 .

[15]  Ruben Budelli,et al.  Electric fish measure distance in the dark , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[18]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of? , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[20]  C. Bell,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  R. Douglas,et al.  Size constancy in goldfish (Carassius auratus) , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  M. Srinivasan Pattern recognition in the honeybee: Recent progress , 1994 .

[23]  Adriana Migliaro,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Pre-Receptor Image Conditioning in Weakly Electric Fish , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  C. Bell,et al.  Mormyromast electroreceptor organs and their afferent fibers in mormyrid fish. III. Physiological differences between two morphological types of fibers. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  A. Nieder,et al.  Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Toerring,et al.  Motor programmes and electroreception in mormyrid fish , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  SENSORY, LEARNED, AND COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF SIZE PERCEPTION * , 1971, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Peter Moller,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the weakly discharging electric fish Gnathonemus petersi using its electric organ discharges as the response measure , 1997 .

[30]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish. , 2004, Journal of physiology, Paris.

[31]  Bruce A. Carlson,et al.  Electric signaling behavior and the mechanisms of electric organ discharge production in mormyrid fish , 2002, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[32]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[33]  C. Bell,et al.  Mormyromast electroreceptor organs and their afferent fibers in mormyrid fish. II. Intra-axonal recordings show initial stages of central processing. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Peter Moller,et al.  Locomotor and electric displays associated with electrolocation during exploratory behavior in mormyrid fish , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  R. Wehner Pattern Recognition in Bees , 1967, Nature.

[36]  G. von der Emde,et al.  Non-visual environmental imaging and object detection through active electrolocation in weakly electric fish , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[38]  Victoria A. Braithwaite,et al.  Laterality in a non-visual sensory modality — the lateral line of fish , 2005, Current Biology.

[39]  P. Moller Electric fishes : history and behavior , 1995 .

[40]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Processing of Dipole and More Complex Hydrodynamic Stimuli Under Still- and Running-Water Conditions , 2003 .

[41]  P. Moller Electric fishes , 1995 .