A fully coupled analysis of unsteady aerodynamics impact on vehicle dynamics during braking

This study investigates the impact of unsteady aerodynamic loads on the behavior of car dynamics during braking maneuvers. In the analysis, two independent solvers were coupled to solve an existing fluid structure interaction (FSI) problem. Transient CFD analysis applying Fluent software was used to obtain realistic aerodynamic loads. A full car, nonlinear dynamic model with elastic suspension system was built in a dedicated multibody dynamic system MSC.Adams/Car. Both physics were integrated into one ecosystem via a block diagram environment for multidomain simulation (Matlab/Simulink). Methodology elements were validated against experimental results for a rectangular beam in cross-flow with vortex-induced vibrations. The final results were validated against a full-scale experiment on a real car. The solution of an untypical flow problem (decreasing car speed during a braking maneuver) required an untypical reference frame. The classic case, with an observer at rest (stationary model and moving air), was replaced with a moving observer. The whole domain was translocated during the analysis with a velocity which varied with time. The problem was further complicated by the presence of movable aerodynamic elements. The overset mesh technique was used to allow movement of the car body and active aerodynamic surfaces. The results obtained show the importance of aerodynamic effects on the braking process. It was shown that in the analyzed scenario, movable aerodynamic features can reduce the distance to stop by 6%. The complex interaction between the active aerodynamic surface and the car body with respect to load split is discussed as well. The methodology proposed to determine the behavior car dynamics with unsteady aerodynamic effects taken into account appears to be a significant improvement when compared with existing methodologies used for such an assessment.

[1]  Damian Harty,et al.  The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics , 2004 .

[2]  H. Tuah Aerodynamic stability of road vehicles in dynamic pitching motion , 2018 .

[3]  Bert Blocken,et al.  50 years of Computational Wind Engineering: Past, present and future , 2014 .

[4]  Gerhard Wickern,et al.  Rotating Wheels - Their Impact on Wind Tunnel Test Techniques and on Vehicle Drag Results , 1997 .

[5]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Experimental Study of the Aerodynamic Interaction Between an Enclosed-Wheel Racing-Car and Its Rear Wing , 1989 .

[6]  P. Harris,et al.  Aerodynamics , 1958, Nature.

[7]  J. Piechna,et al.  Flow control for a car-mounted rear wing , 2019, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[8]  H. Laborit,et al.  [Experimental study]. , 1958, Bulletin mensuel - Societe de medecine militaire francaise.

[9]  Giancarlo Genta,et al.  Motor Vehicle Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation , 1997, Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences.

[10]  Tanghong Liu,et al.  A CFD analysis of the aerodynamics of a high-speed train passing through a windbreak transition under crosswind , 2018 .

[11]  John Foss,et al.  Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 2007 .

[12]  Nerijus Kudarauskas Analysis of Emergency Braking of a Vehicle , 2007 .

[13]  Joseph Katz,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF RACE CARS , 2006 .

[14]  Dennis A. Guenther,et al.  MEASURED VEHICLE INERTIAL PARAMETERS - NHTSA'S DATA THROUGH NOVEMBER 1998. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 1993 .

[15]  Mesbah Uddin,et al.  Turbulence modeling effects on the CFD predictions of flow over a NASCAR Gen 6 racecar , 2018 .

[16]  Matthew C Best A simple realistic driver model , 2012 .

[17]  Martin A. Passmore,et al.  A Fully Coupled, 6 Degree-of-Freedom, Aerodynamic and Vehicle Handling Crosswind Simulation using the DrivAer Model , 2016 .

[18]  Simone Sebben,et al.  CFD investigation on wheel rotation modelling , 2018 .

[19]  Hassan Hemida,et al.  Comparison of RANS and Detached Eddy Simulation Results to Wind-Tunnel Data for the Surface Pressures Upon a Class 43 High-Speed Train , 2015 .

[20]  Hans B. Pacejka,et al.  Tire and Vehicle Dynamics , 1982 .