Allocating greenhouse gas emissions to shipments in road freight transportation: Suggestions for a global carbon accounting standard

The European Norm EN 16258 was published in 2012 to provide a common methodology for the calculation and declaration of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to any transport operation. The objective was to offer a pragmatic and scientifically-acceptable approach that allows a wide group of users to prepare standardized, accurate, credible, comparable, and verifiable energy consumption and emission declarations. However, in its current form, EN 16258 contains gaps and ambiguities, and leaves room for interpretation, which makes comparisons of supply chains difficult. This research aims to overcome the shortcomings in the domain of allocating emissions from road freight transport operations to single shipments. Based on a discussion of emission drivers and the results of numerical experiments comparing the allocation vectors created by the EN 16258 allocation rules with those generated by the Shapley value, which is claimed to be the benchmark, ‘distance’ is identified as the single most useful unit for bridging the trade-off between accuracy and simplicity better than the other recommended allocation schemes. Thus, this paper claims that future versions of EN 16258 should only allow the allocation unit ‘distance.’ This will promote the accurateness, simplicity, consistency, transparency, and comparability of emission declarations.

[1]  Florian Kellner,et al.  Allocating CO2 emissions to shipments in road freight transportation , 2012 .

[2]  Xander Olsthoorn,et al.  Environmental Indicators for Business: A Review of the Literature and Standardisation Methods , 2001 .

[3]  Alan C. McKinnon,et al.  Product‐level carbon auditing of supply chains: Environmental imperative or wasteful distraction? , 2010 .

[4]  Eric G. Olson Challenges and opportunities from greenhouse gas emissions reporting and independent auditing , 2010 .

[5]  Stein Ove Erikstad,et al.  Emission allocation problems in the maritime logistics chain , 2014, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[6]  P. C. Fishburn,et al.  Fixed-Route Cost Allocation , 1983 .

[7]  Eric Ballot,et al.  Allocation of Transportation Cost & CO2 Emission in Pooled Supply Chains Using Cooperative Game Theory , 2012 .

[8]  D. A. de Ree,et al.  Allocating CO2 emission to customers on a distribution route , 2015 .

[9]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  A review of recent research on green road freight transportation , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Towards a global CO2 calculation standard for supply chains: suggestions for methodological improvements , 2014 .

[11]  Christof Kandel,et al.  SHAPLEY VALUE SIMULATION FOR ALLOCATING GHG EMISSION SAVINGS DUE TO LOGISTICS POOLING WITHIN ECR COOPERATIONS , 2011 .

[12]  Chandra Lalwani,et al.  Optimising end-to-end maritime supply chains: a carbon footprint , 2013 .

[13]  Alan Lewis,et al.  Calculating Emissions Along Supply Chains – Is Standardisation for a Global Approach Within Reach? , 2012 .

[14]  Alan C. McKinnon,et al.  Use of a synchronised vehicle audit to determine opportunities for improving transport efficiency in a supply chain , 2004 .

[15]  Peter C. Fishburn Fair cost allocation schemes , 1990 .

[16]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[17]  Anthony T.H. Chin,et al.  Carbon emission allocation methods for the aviation sector , 2013 .

[18]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  S. Cosimato,et al.  Green supply chain management , 2015 .

[20]  Maja Piecyk,et al.  Measurement of CO2 emissions from road freight transport: A review of UK experience , 2009 .

[21]  Haw‐Jan Wu,et al.  Environmentally responsible logistics systems , 1995 .

[22]  Alan Campbell McKinnon,et al.  Green Logistics: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics , 2010 .