Cohesive gel breast implants

Abstract: Breast augmentation surgery has been revolutionised with the advent of more controllable breast shaping based on dimensional planning and measurements. Previously only non-form stable implants filled with responsive gel were available and thus breast augmentation was more arbitrary, based on evaluation of adequate volume rather than a careful measurement of the biological conditions. The foundation for this new era was the introduction of form stable implants in the mid 1990s and the development of a wide range of implant shapes, both anatomical with varying height and projections and round with variable projection. Breast augmentation has thereby become much more customised in relation to patients’ desires and biological prerequisites. To achieve superior results with these new implants it is important to understand the fundamental differences that exist in choosing, planning and executing the surgery compared to traditional breast augmentation techniques. This chapter will describe how this is done in detail.

[1]  Nadeem Akhtar,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Preoperative Imaging in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  E. Hall-Findlay.  Breast Implant Complication Review: Double Capsules and Late Seromas , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  M. Jewell,et al.  A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. , 2010, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[4]  P. Hedén,et al.  Style 410 Cohesive Silicone Breast Implants: Safety and Effectiveness at 5 to 9 Years after Implantation , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  J. Tebbetts.  Achieving a Zero Percent Reoperation Rate at 3 Years in a 50-Consecutive-Case Augmentation Mammaplasty Premarket Approval Study , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  M. Revol,et al.  Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Olsen,et al.  Prevalence of Silicone Breast Implant Rupture among Danish Women , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  P. Hedén,et al.  Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience. , 2001, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[9]  J. Tebbetts.  Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  A. Danino,et al.  Étude au microscope électronique à balayage des surfaces des implants mammaires à texturation poreuse et de leurs capsules. Description de l'effet « velcro å des prothèses à texturation poreuse , 2001 .