Comparison of value of leads from body surface maps to 12-lead electrocardiogram for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

We aimed to develop 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) models testing ST-elevation criteria with QRST variables and compare their performance with the 80-lead body surface map (BSM) in detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because the prevalence of non-ST-elevation AMI is increasing worldwide, advances in early ECG detection of AMI are urgently needed. The study population was 755 consecutive patients presenting with ischemic chest pain from January 2002 to June 2004. All patients had electrocardiography and body surface mapping performed at initial presentation. AMI occurred in 519 patients (69%, cardiac troponin T or I level > or =0.1 ng/ml). Of these 519 patients, 303 (58%) had no ST-elevation on the initial 12-lead electrocardiogram. Ten patients were classified as having an "aborted AMI" and were included in the AMI analysis. The American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology criteria for ST-elevation on 12-lead electrocardiogram identified 236 patients with AMI (sensitivity 45%, specificity 92%). Additional QRST features improved sensitivity (51% to 68%) but with decreased specificity (71% to 89%), with the optimal multivariate ECG model having a c-statistic of 0.75. The optimal BSM model identified 402 patients as having AMI (sensitivity 76%, specificity 92%, c-statistic 0.84). This improvement in sensitivity over the 12-lead electrocardiogram was due mainly to detection of ST-elevation in the high right anterior, posterior, and right ventricular territories and AMI in the presence of left bundle branch block. In conclusion, QRST variables added to criteria for ST-elevation result in improvement in sensitivity of the 12-lead electrocardiogram, although with decreased specificity. The BSM is superior in detecting AMI and demonstrates the importance of electroanatomic evaluation of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

[1]  I. Menown,et al.  Comparison of the 80-lead body surface map to physician and to 12-lead electrocardiogram in detection of acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  D Freimark,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: "hidden" ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Aborted myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen-3 Trial Electrocardiographic Substudy. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Modification of ACC/ESC criteria for acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.

[5]  Simon J Walsh,et al.  Prehospital 80-LAD mapping: does it add significantly to the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes? , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.

[6]  J. Soler‐Soler,et al.  Prognostic significance of ST segment depression in lateral leads I, aVL, V5 and V6 on the admission electrocardiogram in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  I. Menown,et al.  ST depression only on the initial 12-lead ECG: early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, European heart journal.

[8]  I. Menown,et al.  Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block , 2003, Heart.

[9]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Combination With the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin in the Prehospital Setting: The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS Randomized Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  J. Soler‐Soler,et al.  Prognostic Value of Lead aVR in Patients With a First Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Circulation.

[11]  I. Menown,et al.  Optimizing the initial 12-lead electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[12]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Left Circumflex Occlusion—Underrecognized and Undertreated , 2000, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[14]  G. Wagner,et al.  Consideration of the total ST-segment deviation on the initial electrocardiogram for predicting final acute posterior myocardial infarct size in patients with maximum ST-segment deviation as depression in leads V1 through V3. A FRISC II substudy. , 2005, Journal of electrocardiology.

[15]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Do patients with left circumflex coronary artery-related acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation benefit from reperfusion therapy? , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.