Role of scenario planning and probabilities in economic decision problems – literature review and new conclusions

Purpose – scenario planning is very helpful when the decision maker deals with uncertain issues. Probabilities are also frequently applied to such problems. In the paper, we examine the correctness of combining probabilities with scenario planning in economic decisions which are usually made under uncertainty. The goal of the article is to find and discuss cases where the use of probabilities in scenario planning is appropriate and cases where such an approach is not desirable. Research methodology – in order to achieve this target, we first make a concise literature review of existing approaches concerning the application of probabilities to scenario planning. Then, we investigate and compare diverse decision making circumstances presented by means of numerical examples and differing from each other with regard to the nature of the decision problem (way of payoff estimation, novelty degree of the problem, access to historical data etc.) and the decision maker’s objectives and preferences (one-shot or multi-shots decisions, attitude towards risk). We explore the newsvendor problem, the spare parts quantity problem, the project selection problem and the project time management with scenario-based decision project graphs. Findings – the work contains both recommendations already described in the literature and suggestions formulated by the author. We get to the point that scenario planning is unquestionable support for decision making under uncertainty, however, the use of probabilities as an accompanying tool may be necessary and justified in some specific cases only. Their significance depends for instance on (1) the number of times a given variant is supposed to be executed; (2) the decision maker’s knowledge about the considered problem; (3) the novelty degree of the problem; (4) the decision maker’s conviction that the probability values really reflect his/her attitude towards risk. The analysis of numerical examples leads us to the conclusion that scenario planning should not be linked with the likelihood (1) for one-shot decisions problems; (2) for decision problems related to different kinds of innovation; (3) in the case of lack of certainty which type of probability definition ought to be applied to a given situation; (4) if the decision maker anticipates new future factors not included in historical data. Research limitations – in the paper we mainly analyse one-criterion problems and payoff matrices with data precisely defined. Further conclusions can be obtained after investigating multi-criteria cases and examples with interval payoffs. We limit our research to selected probability definitions. Nevertheless, a wider review can lead to new interesting observations. Practical implications – the aforementioned findings are crucial in such domains as economic modeling and decision theory. The results of the research can be used in planning, management, and decision optimization. They provide valuable guidelines for each decision maker dealing with an uncertain future. Originality/Value – authors of previous papers related to this topic have already formulated many significant conclusions. However, this contribution examines the problem from a new point of view since it concentrates on novel decisions, concerning unique, innovative or innovation projects (products). It encourages the decision makers to treat problems usually called in the literature “stochastic problems” (i.e. with known probability distribution) as “strategic problems” (i.e. with unknown probability distribution). This is especially the case of the newsvendor problem and the spare parts quantity problem. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.011

[1]  George Wright,et al.  Future‐focussed thinking: combining scenario planning with decision analysis , 1999 .

[2]  I. Durbach Outranking under uncertainty using scenarios , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Volker Grienitz,et al.  Scenario development without probabilities — focusing on the most important scenario , 2013 .

[4]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  On Securities Portfolio Optimization, Preferences, Payoff Matrix Estimation and Uncertain Mixed Decision Making , 2015 .

[5]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[6]  Martin Weber Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1987 .

[7]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  Resource Allocation Under Complete Uncertainty - Case of Asymmetric Payoffs , 2016 .

[8]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch On a decision rule supported by a forecasting stage based on the decision maker’s coefficient of optimism , 2015, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  A decision rule based on goal programming and one-stage models for uncertain multi-criteria mixed decision making and games against nature , 2017 .

[10]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch Newsvendor problem under complete uncertainty: a case of innovative products , 2017, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios: Editors Liam Fahey and Robert M. Randall, John Wiley (1998), 446 pp., £27.50 , 1998 .

[12]  P. Schoemaker MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[13]  Stephen M. Millett,et al.  Should Probabilities Be Used with Scenarios , 2009 .

[14]  A. Ravi Ravindran,et al.  Operations Research and Management Science Handbook , 2007 .

[15]  P. Laplace Théorie analytique des probabilités , 1995 .

[16]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[17]  P. Walley Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[18]  Serkan Aras,et al.  Comparative study on retail sales forecasting between single and combination methods , 2017 .

[19]  Jerzy Michnik,et al.  Scenario Planning + MCDA Procedure For Innovation Selection Problem , 2013 .

[20]  INNOVATION IN CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIES , 2016 .

[21]  Jean-Charles Pomerol,et al.  Scenario development and practical decision making under uncertainty , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Z. Kmietowicz,et al.  Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance , 1984 .

[23]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[24]  Baoding Liu Some Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory , 2009 .

[25]  Yuval Cohen,et al.  The newsvendor problem with unknown distribution , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Seweryn Spałek,et al.  Innovative vs. Innovation Projects in Organisations , 2016 .

[27]  B. Caplan The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations , 1999 .

[28]  A. Kolmogoroff Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1933 .

[29]  Sébastien Konieczny,et al.  A Characterization of Optimality Criteria for Decision Making under Complete Ignorance , 2010, KR.

[30]  Ian Wilson,et al.  The scenario-planning handbook : a practitioner's guide to developing and using scenarios to direct strategy in today's uncertain times , 2006 .

[31]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Literature review of methods for representing uncertainty , 2013 .

[32]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2002 .

[33]  David Lindley,et al.  Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .

[34]  M. Sachs The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism , 1985 .

[35]  W. Warmuth De Finetti, B.: Theory of Probability - A Critical Introductory Treatment, Volume 2. John Wiley & Sons, London-New York-Sydney-Toronto 1975. XIV, 375 S., £ 10.50 , 1977 .

[36]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  Project Net Present Value estimation under uncertainty , 2019, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Z. W. Kmietowicz,et al.  Decision Theory and Incomplete Knowledge , 1981 .

[38]  Peijun Guo,et al.  One-shot decision making with regret , 2013, 2013 IEEE Third International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST).

[39]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[40]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  A Decision Rule for Uncertain Multi-Criteria Pure Decision Making and Independent Criteria , 2017 .

[41]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Gradualness, uncertainty and bipolarity: Making sense of fuzzy sets , 2012, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[42]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Logical Foundations of Probability. , 1951 .

[43]  Lena Jaeger,et al.  The Art Of The Long View , 2016 .

[44]  Maurice Fréchet The diverse definitions of probability , 1939 .

[45]  V. N. Shashikhin,et al.  Antagonistic Game with Interval Payoff Functions , 2004 .

[46]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  A decision rule for uncertain multicriteria mixed decision making based on the coefficient of optimism , 2015, MCDM 2015.

[47]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[48]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[49]  A. Wald,et al.  Probability, statistics and truth , 1939 .

[50]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  On Human Action , 2011, Visual Analysis of Humans.

[51]  Jean-Luc Ville Étude critique de la notion de collectif , 1939 .

[52]  Jean-Charles Pomerol,et al.  Scenario Development and Practical Decision Making under Uncertainty: Application to Requirements Engineering , 1998, Requirements Engineering.

[53]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  Plausibility and probability in scenario planning , 2014 .

[54]  A. N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Foundations of the theory of probability , 1960 .

[55]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch Modifications of the Omega ratio for decision making under uncertainty , 2015 .

[56]  Didier Dubois Possibility Theory, Probability Theory and Multiple-Valued Logics: A Clarification , 2001, Fuzzy Days.

[57]  Peter Zweifel,et al.  One-shot decisions under Linear Partial Information , 1993 .

[58]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[59]  Gilberto Montibeller,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Strategic Decision Making , 2010 .

[60]  Guido Reger,et al.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Scenario Approaches for Strategic Foresight , 2005 .

[61]  K. Jantke Planning for Learning , 2020, The Power of Assessment for Learning: Twenty Years of Research and Practice in UK and US Classrooms.

[62]  Omar Besbes,et al.  On Implications of Demand Censoring in the Newsvendor Problem , 2010, Management Sciences.

[63]  Eugeny Y. Kolesnikov UNCERTAINTY OF PROBABILITY COMPONENT OF ACCIDENTAL RISK , 2014 .

[64]  Peijun Guo,et al.  One-Shot Decision Theory: A Fundamental Alternative for Decision Under Uncertainty , 2014, Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences.

[65]  Richard Von Mises,et al.  Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre Anwendung in der Statistik und theoretischen Physik , 1931 .

[66]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Scenario-based portfolio model for building robust and proactive strategies , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Tarum Khanna,et al.  Cómo ganar en los mercados emergentes , 2010 .

[68]  Helena Gaspars-Wieloch,et al.  Innovative projects scheduling with scenario-based decision project graphs , 2017 .

[70]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  On Decision Making under Interval Uncertainty: A New Justification of Hurwicz Optimism-Pessimism Approach and its Use in Group Decision Making , 2009, 2009 39th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic.

[71]  J. Vicianová,et al.  Developing eco-innovation in business practice in Slovakia , 2017 .

[72]  Cezary Dominiak,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[73]  Bruno Urli,et al.  PROMISE/scenarios: An interactive method for multiobjective stochastic linear programming under partial uncertainty , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[74]  ludwing Von Mises,et al.  The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science , 1963 .

[75]  B. Caplan PROBABILITY, COMMON SENSE, AND REALISM: A REPLY TO HLSMANN AND BLOCK , 2001 .

[76]  Norman N. Barish,et al.  Decision-Making Allowing for Uncertainty of Future Investment Opportunities , 1967 .

[77]  P. Frankelius Questioning two myths in innovation literature , 2009 .