Features and functions of decision support systems for appropriate diagnostic imaging: a scoping review

Abstract Background Diagnostic imaging decision support (DI-DS) systems could be effective tools for reducing inappropriate diagnostic imaging examinations. Since effective design and evaluation of these systems requires in-depth understanding of their features and functions, the present study aims to map the existing literature on DI-DS systems to identify features and functions of these systems. Methods The search was performed using Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and was limited to 2000 to 2021. Analytical studies, descriptive studies, reviews and book chapters that explicitly addressed the functions or features of DI-DS systems were included. Results A total of 6,046 studies were identified. Out of these, 55 studies met the inclusion criteria. From these, 22 functions and 22 features were identified. Some of the identified features were: visibility, content chunking/grouping, deployed as a multidisciplinary program, clinically valid and relevant feedback, embedding current evidence, and targeted recommendations. And, some of the identified functions were: displaying an appropriateness score, recommending alternative or more appropriate imaging examination(s), providing recommendations for next diagnostic steps, and providing safety alerts. Conclusions The set of features and functions obtained in the present study can provide a basis for developing well-designed DI-DS systems, which could help to improve adherence to diagnostic imaging guidelines, minimize unnecessary costs, and improve the outcome of care through appropriate diagnosis and on-time care delivery.

[1]  E. Borycki,et al.  Human factors in healthcare IT: Management considerations and trends , 2022, Healthcare management forum.

[2]  Marla B. K. Sammer,et al.  Prospective cost implications with a clinical decision support system for pediatric emergency head computed tomography , 2021, Pediatric Radiology.

[3]  C. E. Kahn,et al.  Lessons From the Free-Text Epidemic: Opportunities to Optimize Deployment of Imaging Clinical Decision Support. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[4]  Tianxi Cai,et al.  Improved Appropriateness of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging After Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Mechanism , 2021, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[5]  C. Sarkisian,et al.  Quality improvement time-saving intervention to increase use of a clinical decision support tool to reduce low-value diagnostic imaging in a safety net health system , 2021, BMJ open quality.

[6]  C. Gaskin,et al.  Use of a Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Tool to Expedite Prior Authorization in Partnership With a Private Payer. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[7]  R. Holleman,et al.  Effects of an Electronic Medical Record Intervention on Appropriateness of Transthoracic Echocardiograms: A Prospective Study. , 2020, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  B. Wells,et al.  HEART Pathway Implementation Safely Reduces Hospitalizations at One Year in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. , 2020, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  D. Makarov,et al.  A Clinical Reminder Order Check (CROC) Intervention to Improve Guideline-Concordant Imaging Practices for men with Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. , 2020, Urology.

[10]  R. Mendelson.  Diagnostic imaging: Doing the right thing , 2020, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[11]  L. Annemans,et al.  Belgian multicentre study on lumbar spine imaging: Radiation dose and cost analysis; Evaluation of compliance with recommendations for efficient use of medical imaging. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[12]  E. Neri,et al.  Application of the ESR iGuide clinical decision support system to the imaging pathway of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: preliminary findings , 2020, La radiologia medica.

[13]  Ruhani Doda Khera,et al.  Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness , 2019, European Radiology.

[14]  Peter C. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study , 2019, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[15]  N. Schep,et al.  The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study , 2019, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[16]  K. Hunter,et al.  Utilization and appropriateness in cervical spine trauma imaging: implementation of clinical decision support criteria , 2019, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[17]  M. Grieten,et al.  National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg , 2019, Insights into Imaging.

[18]  Sherwin S. Chan,et al.  Clinical decision support: practical implementation at two pediatric hospitals , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.

[19]  Amy N. Finkelstein,et al.  Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial , 2019, PloS one.

[20]  European Society of Radiology.  Methodology for ESR iGuide content , 2019, Insights into Imaging.

[21]  Giuseppe Di Modica,et al.  A clinical decision support system to increase appropriateness of diagnostic imaging prescriptions , 2018, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[22]  J. Patrie,et al.  Impact of a Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Program on Provider Ordering Habits. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[23]  E. J. Ha,et al.  Implementation of Korean Clinical Imaging Guidelines: A Mobile App-Based Decision Support System , 2018, Korean journal of radiology.

[24]  M. Drescher,et al.  Knowledge Translation of the PERC Rule for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Blueprint for Reducing the Number of CT Pulmonary Angiograms , 2017, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[25]  C. Langlotz,et al.  Clinical decision support increases diagnostic yield of computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism , 2017, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[26]  B. Forster,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Decreases Volume of Imaging for Low Back Pain in an Urban Emergency Department. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[27]  Kelly Bookman,et al.  Embedded Clinical Decision Support in Electronic Health Record Decreases Use of High‐cost Imaging in the Emergency Department: EmbED study , 2017, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[28]  S. Halabi,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Unstructured Clinical Information on Clinical Decision Support Appropriateness Ratings. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[29]  J. Thrall,et al.  Analysis of Low Appropriateness Score Exam Trends in Decision Support-based Radiology Order Entry System. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[30]  European Society of Radiology.  Summary of the proceedings of the international forum 2016: “Imaging referral guidelines and clinical decision support - how can radiologists implement imaging referral guidelines in clinical routine?” , 2017, Insights into Imaging.

[31]  Daniel von Allmen,et al.  Risk Stratification to Decrease Unnecessary Diagnostic Imaging for Acute Appendicitis , 2016, Pediatrics.

[32]  H. Harvey,et al.  Imaging Decision Support Does Not Drive Out-of-Network Leakage of Referred Imaging. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[33]  H. Cronin,et al.  24 ROLE OF EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY (ESC) SYNCOPE GUIDELINES IN REDUCING SYNCOPE RELATED ADMISSIONS , 2016 .

[34]  T. Ferris,et al.  Provider Feedback about Imaging Appropriateness by Using Scores from Order Entry Decision Support: Raw Rates Misclassify Outliers. , 2015, Radiology.

[35]  S. Halabi,et al.  The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[36]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Radiology order decision support: examination-indication appropriateness assessed using 2 electronic systems. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[37]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Impact of clinical decision support on head computed tomography use in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. , 2015, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[38]  R. Khorasani,et al.  Effect of Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support on the Use and Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiographic Imaging in Hospitalized Patients. , 2015, Radiology.

[39]  J. Burke,et al.  Headache neuroimaging: Routine testing when guidelines recommend against them , 2015, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[40]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[41]  J. Thrall.  Appropriateness and imaging utilization: "computerized provider order entry and decision support". , 2014, Academic radiology.

[42]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain. , 2014, The American journal of medicine.

[43]  A. Ranta,et al.  Utility of a primary care based transient ischaemic attack electronic decision support tool: a prospective sequential comparison , 2014, BMC Family Practice.

[44]  Christopher Deible,et al.  Head CT scan overuse in frequently admitted medical patients. , 2014, The American journal of medicine.

[45]  Safwan S Halabi,et al.  Improving the application of imaging clinical decision support tools: making the complex simple. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[46]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging. , 2013, The American journal of medicine.

[47]  D. Berman,et al.  Impact of an automated multimodality point-of-order decision support tool on rates of appropriate testing and clinical decision making for individuals with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective multicenter study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  A. Akbari Sari,et al.  Evidence for Policy Making: Clinical Appropriateness Study of Lumbar Spine MRI Prescriptions Using RAND Appropriateness Method. , 2013, International journal of health policy and management.

[49]  Lynn Curry,et al.  Electronic decision support for diagnostic imaging in a primary care setting , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[50]  Lynn Curry,et al.  The effect of incorporating guidelines into a computerized order entry system for diagnostic imaging. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[51]  Jeffrey B. Weilburg,et al.  Increasing the appropriateness of outpatient imaging: effects of a barrier to ordering low-yield examinations. , 2010, Radiology.

[52]  James H Thrall,et al.  Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. , 2009, Radiology.

[53]  James H Thrall,et al.  Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[54]  Pablo R Ros,et al.  Utilization management in radiology: basic concepts and applications. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[55]  Nauman A. Qureshi,et al.  An Engineering Approach to Integrate Non-Functional Requirements (NFR) to Achieve High Quality Software Process , 2020, ICEIS.

[56]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Examining clinical decision support integrity: is clinician self-reported data entry accurate? , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[57]  Gary S Kaplan,et al.  Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.