Local Friendship Ties and Community Attachment in Mass Society: A Multi-Level Systemic Model

This study presents a multilevel empirical test of a systemic theory of community attachment in mass society. The data bases are derived from a recent national sample of 10,905 residents of 238 localities in Great Britain that vary across an urban-rural continuum. The first stage of analysis examines the structural determinants of between-community variations in local friendship ties, collective attachment, and rates of local social participation. Community residential stability has positive effects on all three dimensions of community social integration, independent of urbanization, density, and numerous other controls. The second stage of analysis examines the extent to which community characteristics affect individual-level local social bonds. Residential stability has both individual-level and contextual effects on locality-based friendships and on participation in social and leisure activities. The results support the systemic model and demonstrate the importance of linking the microand macro-level dimensions of local community bonds.

[1]  F. Tönnies,et al.  Community and Society , 1988 .

[2]  Peter Willmott,et al.  Friendship Networks and Social Support , 1987 .

[3]  William Freudenburg,et al.  The Density of Acquaintanceship: An Overlooked Variable in Community Research? , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  J. Coleman.  Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Fear of Crime and Neighborhood Change , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[6]  T. C. Wilson.  Settlement Type and Interpersonal Estrangement: A Test of the Theories of Wirth and Gans , 1985 .

[7]  H. Blalock,et al.  Contextual-Effects Models: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 1984 .

[8]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[9]  W. DuMouchel,et al.  Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified Samples , 1983 .

[10]  Pat Mayhew,et al.  The British Crime Survey , 1983 .

[11]  N. Milburn.  To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1983 .

[12]  B. Wellman.  Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles , 1983 .

[13]  P. Mayhew,et al.  The British crime survey: First report , 1983 .

[14]  L. Sigelman,et al.  The Community Question: A Perspective from National Survey Data - The Case of the USA , 1982 .

[15]  W. Gove,et al.  Residential Crowding in Urban America. , 1980 .

[16]  R. Webber.  Parliamentary constituencies: a socio-economic classification , 1978 .

[17]  E. Hanushek.  Statistical methods for social scientists , 1977 .

[18]  C. Fischer,et al.  Networks and places: social relations in the urban setting , 1977 .

[19]  J. Kasarda,et al.  Contemporary Urban Ecology , 1977 .

[20]  M. Janowitz,et al.  Community Attachment in Mass Society , 1974 .

[21]  A. Hunter.  Symbolic communities: The persistence and change of Chicago's local communities , 1974 .

[22]  Robert M. Hauser,et al.  Context and Consex: A Cautionary Tale , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .

[24]  Amos H. Hawley,et al.  Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure , 1950 .

[25]  L. Wirth.  Urbanism as a Way of Life , 1938, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  E. Durkheim,et al.  Rules of Sociological Method , 1964 .