Abstract-DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.018 Goal, Scope and Background Life cycle assessment has emerged into a useful tool to assess and potentially reduce the environmental impacts per functional unit. This has contributed to increase eco-efficiency but not necessarily to decrease absolute pollution per capita. The number of functional units is increasing and new functions add to the impacts of consumption. Despite the attempts to use different levels of definitions for the functional unit and applying LCA in the field of lifestyle studies there has been little success to grasp the consumption side of sustainable production and consumption. This contribution aims to tackle the consumption side by at least two extensions: the function of products, services, and activities is assessed with a multi-attribute need function and the propensity to cause both psychological and physical rebound effects are considered in the design phase. Methods We develop a checklist approach with an evaluation and assessment table. The elements of the checklist are rooted in a number of independent fields of science: needs matrix, happiness enhancing factors, a number of limiting factors that can cause rebound effects, and streamlined LCA. Results and Conclusion For illustration purposes we comparatively evaluate gardening, having a dog, a weekend house, and starting yoga classes and show that the new analysis framework is able to make transparent and operable the inclusion of a number of additional factors that remained so far implicit or neglected. The additional factors considered can be grouped into factors that may cause rebound effects through psychological or physical mechanisms. The assessment table combines the degree of satisfying needs and enhancing happiness in a psychological rebound score. The physical rebound score considers six factors that may constrain consumption: Costs, time, space, other scarce resources, information, and skills. This allows predicting the potential for rebound effects that would increase total impacts from consumption. In addition, it gives also a handle on how to use the knowledge on rebound effects to not only reduce the impacts of the product or activity at hand but also reducing other consumption that in turn might have adverse impacts. Recommendation and Perspective Many assumptions in selecting and quantifying the additional factors and the final assessment procedure remain conceptual and therefore provisional. This contribution opens new avenues of investigations that need both further refinements of the theories and empirical evidence. Consumerism and materialism has undermined much of the success stories of improved eco-efficiency and LCA. We suggest using some of the very same psychological and physical mechanisms to foster sustainable consumption.
[1]
Lee Schipper,et al.
Life-styles and the Environment: The Case of Energy
,
1997
.
[2]
Erich Fromm,et al.
To Have or to Be
,
1976
.
[3]
E. Deci,et al.
On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.
,
2001,
Annual review of psychology.
[4]
Gordon C. Winston.
The Timing of Economic Activities: Firms, Households and Markets in Time-Specific Analysis
,
2008
.
[5]
M. Binswanger.
Time-Saving Innovations and Their Impact on Energy Use: Some Lessons from a Household-Production-Function Approach
,
2002
.
[6]
L. Schipper,et al.
Linking Life-Styles and Energy Use: A Matter of Time?
,
1989
.
[7]
A. Maslow.
Motivation and Personality
,
1954
.
[8]
Time as the Ultimate Source of Utility
,
1973
.
[9]
M. Fordyce.
A program to increase happiness: Further studies.
,
1983
.
[10]
Richard Wiseman,et al.
The Luck Factor
,
2003
.
[11]
Birgitta Gatersleben,et al.
Sustainable household consumption and quality of life: the acceptability of sustainable consumption patterns and consumer policy strategies
,
2001
.
[12]
Patrick Hofstetter,et al.
Tools for Comparative Analysis of Alternatives: Competing or Complementary Perspectives?
,
2002,
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[13]
D. Greene,et al.
Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey
,
2000
.
[14]
M. Binswanger.
Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect?
,
2001
.
[15]
M. Csíkszentmihályi.
The Costs and Benefits of Consuming
,
2000
.
[16]
G. Becker,et al.
A Theory of the Allocation of Time
,
1965
.
[17]
Daniel T. Spreng,et al.
Net Energy Analysis and the Energy Requirements of Energy Systems
,
1988
.
[18]
A. Hirschman.
An Alternative Explanation of Contemporary Harriedness
,
1973
.
[19]
Gjalt Huppes,et al.
Three Strategies to Overcome the Limitations of Life‐Cycle Assessment
,
2004
.
[20]
B. Frey,et al.
What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?
,
2001,
SSRN Electronic Journal.
[21]
H. Haes.
LCA Can be Very Relaxed…
,
1997
.
[22]
T. Kasser.
The High Price of Materialism
,
2002
.
[23]
S. Lyubomirsky,et al.
Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change
,
2005
.
[24]
E. Diener,et al.
Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations.
,
2000
.