On consensus in a correlated model of network formation based on a Polya urn process

In this paper, we consider a consensus seeking process based on local averaging of opinions in a dynamic model of social network formation. At each time step, individual agents randomly choose another agent to interact with. The interaction is one-sided and results in the agent averaging her opinion with that of her randomly chosen neighbor. Once an agent chooses a neighbor, the probabilities of interactions are updated in such a way that prior interactions are reinforced and future interactions become more likely, resulting in a random consensus process in which networks are highly correlated with each other. Using results of Skyrm and Pemantle and utilizing the de Finetti representation theorem as well as properties of Polya urn processes, we show that this highly correlated process is equivalent to a mixture of i.i.d. processes whose parameters are drawn from a random limit distribution. Therefore, prior results on consensus on i.i.d. processes can be used to show consensus and to compute the statistics of the consensus value in terms of the initial conditions. We provide simple expressions for the mean and the variance of the asymptotic random consensus value in terms of the number of nodes. We also show that the variance converges to a factor of the empirical variance of the initial values that depends only on the size of the network and goes to zero as the size of the network grows.

[1]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  Chai Wah Wu,et al.  Synchronization and convergence of linear dynamics in random directed networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Sandro Zampieri,et al.  Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks , 2007 .

[4]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Mehran Mesbahi,et al.  Agreement over random networks , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[6]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[7]  John S. Baras,et al.  Convergence Results for the Linear Consensus Problem under Markovian Random Graphs , 2013, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[8]  Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi,et al.  Consensus Over Ergodic Stationary Graph Processes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Giorgio Picci,et al.  Almost sure convergence of random gossip algorithms , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  On Krause's Multi-Agent Consensus Model With State-Dependent Connectivity , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Sandro Zampieri,et al.  Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks , 2007, 2007 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[12]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[13]  Behrouz Touri,et al.  On Ergodicity, Infinite Flow, and Consensus in Random Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  T. Schelling Models of Segregation , 1969 .

[15]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[16]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Consensus Seeking Over Random Weighted Directed Graphs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi,et al.  A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Consensus Over Random Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[19]  Victor M. Preciado,et al.  Variance analysis of randomized consensus in switching directed networks , 2009, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[20]  D. A. Sprott Urn Models and Their Application—An Approach to Modern Discrete Probability Theory , 1978 .

[21]  Luc Moreau,et al.  Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[22]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Problems in decentralized decision making and computation , 1984 .

[23]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1997, Complex.

[24]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds , 2010 .

[25]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Randomized gossip algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[26]  F. Bullo,et al.  Analysis and design tools for distributed motion coordination , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[27]  B Skyrms,et al.  A dynamic model of social network formation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  On the Ecology of Micromotives , 1974 .

[29]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.