Mastery Testing and Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of forty-nine comparative studies showed that mastery testing generally has positive effects on student learning, but the size of effect in any single study depends on both the stringency of the mastery criterion used with the mastery group and the degree of experimental control employed in the study. Mastery effects were also more pronounced on the less able students in a classroom and were less noticeable in more able students. Finally, the analysis showed that mastery testing increased the amount of time needed for instruction.

[1]  T. Guskey.  The Effects of Staff Development on Teachers’ Perceptions About Effective Teaching , 1985 .

[2]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  An Investigation into the Effects of a Modified Mastery Strategy on Achievement in a High School Human Physiology Unit. , 1981 .

[3]  J. C. Riddell,et al.  Systematic Manipulation of Student Pacing, the Perfection Requirement, and Contact with a Teaching Assistant in an Introductory Psychology Course , 1975 .

[4]  D. Dyck,et al.  Programmed Student Achievement: A Test of the Avoidance Hypothesis. , 1974 .

[5]  Time costs of mastery learning. , 1983 .

[6]  Joan K. Honeycutt.  The Effects of Computer Managed Instruction on Content Learning of Undergraduate Students. , 1974 .

[7]  Gary E. Dunkelberger,et al.  The Influence of Repeatable Testing on Retention In Mastery Learning , 1984 .

[8]  B. Goldwater,et al.  Instructor-Paced, Mass-Testing for Mastery Performance in an Introductory Psychology Course , 1975 .

[9]  Mastery learning and students' attributions at the college level , 1984 .

[10]  T. Guskey,et al.  Mastery Learning: A model for academic success in urban junior colleges , 1979 .

[11]  F. G. Dillashaw,et al.  Effects of a modified mastery learning strategy on achievement, attitudes, and on‐task behavior of high school chemistry students , 1983 .

[12]  J. Okey,et al.  Diagnostic evaluation methods in individualized instruction , 1972 .

[13]  Diagnosis, Remediation, and Locus of Control: Effects on Immediate and Retained Achievement and Attitudes. , 1981 .

[14]  Exploring the effects of general remediation on ninth‐graders' achievement of the mole concept , 1980 .

[15]  G. Semb,et al.  The effects of mastery criteria and assignment length on college student test performance. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  M. Gettinger,et al.  Applying the Mastery Learning Model to Sight Word Instruction for Disabled Readers. , 1982 .

[17]  Altering Teacher and Pupil Behavior with Mastery Teaching. , 1974 .

[18]  The Effects of Formative Evaluation and Remediation on Mastery of Intellectual Skills. , 1975 .

[19]  D. E. Bostow,et al.  A comparison of two college classroom testing procedures: required remediation versus no remediation. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  M. J. Klishis,et al.  Mastery: The Essential Essential in PSI , 1978 .

[21]  P. Leppmann,et al.  PSI--What Are the Critical Elements?. , 1981 .

[22]  Correlation Between Frequent Testing and Student Performance. , 1974 .

[23]  Lorin W. Anderson,et al.  An empirical investigation of individual differences in time to learn. , 1976 .

[24]  Tim L. Wentling,et al.  Mastery versus Nonmastery Instruction with Varying Test Item Feedback Treatments. , 1973 .

[25]  The effects of contingency avoidance on programmed student achievement , 1975 .

[26]  Joan E. Fehlen.  Mastery Learning Techniques in the Traditional Classroom Setting , 1976 .

[27]  Effects of a Mastery Approach on Social Studies Achievement and Unit Evaluation. , 1980 .

[28]  Generalizability of Diagnostic-Prescriptive Teaching Strategies across Student Locus of Control and Multiple Instructional Units. , 1986 .

[29]  Russell H. Yeany,et al.  The Effects of Diagnostic-Prescriptive Instruction and Locus of Control on the Achievement and Attitudes of University Students. , 1980 .

[30]  P. Massad,et al.  Student Performance in Introductory Psychology following Termination of the Programmed Achievement Contingency at Mid-Semester , 1977 .

[31]  S. Roop,et al.  A Comparison of Two Mastery Approaches to Teaching Introductory Psychology , 1975 .

[32]  Russell H. Yeany,et al.  The effects of diagnosis with teacher‐or student‐directed remediation on science achievement and attitudes , 1978 .

[33]  Behavioral Objectives and Mastery Learning Applied to Two Areas of Junior College Instruction. , 1973 .

[34]  L. Anderson.  Student Involvement in Learning and School Achievement. , 1974 .

[35]  James A. Kulik,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies of Keller's Personalized System of Instruction. , 1979 .

[36]  Teaching to Achieve Learning Mastery by Using Retesting Techniques. , 1976 .

[37]  T. Guskey.  The Influence of Change in Instructional Effectiveness Upon the Affective Characteristics of Teachers , 1984 .

[38]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Mastery Learning and Student Teams: A Factorial Experiment in Urban General Mathematics Classes , 1984 .

[39]  J. Denton,et al.  Learning for mastery versus personalized system of instruction: A comparison of remediation strategies with secondary school chemistry students , 1977 .

[40]  F. Keller.  "Good-bye, teacher...". , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[41]  Do the Learning Benefits of Behavioral Instruction Outweigh the Psychological Costs , 1981 .

[42]  An Investigation of John B. Carroll's Model of School Learning as a Basis for Facilitating Individualized Instruction by Way of School Organizational Patterning. , 1977 .

[43]  George Vassilios Komaridis.  THE EFFECTS OF FOUR TESTING SYSTEMS ON SCHEDULES OF STUDY, TEST PERFORMANCE, AND RETENTION OF MATERIALS , 1971 .