Network inertia and inbound open innovation: is there a bidirectional relationship?

[1]  L. Ardito,et al.  The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? , 2020 .

[2]  Jörg Sydow,et al.  Open innovation at the interorganizational network level – Stretching practices to face technological discontinuities in the semiconductor industry , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[3]  Yixin Ding,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between open innovation, knowledge management capability and dual innovation , 2019, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[4]  Qingpu Zhang,et al.  The double-edged sword of external search in collaboration networks: embeddedness in knowledge networks as moderators , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  T. Devinney,et al.  Containing the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome in external knowledge absorption and open innovation: The role of indirect countermeasures , 2019, Research Policy.

[6]  Jeonghwan Jeon,et al.  Monitoring patterns of open innovation using the patent-based brokerage analysis , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[7]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration and Firm Value in Software Ecosystems: Evidence From Cloud Computing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  G. Perrone,et al.  Network position and innovation capability in the regional innovation network , 2019, European Planning Studies.

[9]  Sui-Hua Yu,et al.  External knowledge, intraorganisational networks and exploratory innovation: an empirical examination , 2019, Innovation.

[10]  J. Arias-Pérez,et al.  Information technology capabilities and organizational agility , 2019, Multinational Business Review.

[11]  Yibo Lyu,et al.  Network embeddedness and inbound open innovation practice: The moderating role of technology cluster , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[12]  Yapu Zhao,et al.  Network centrality and innovation performance: the role of formal and informal institutions in emerging economies , 2019, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

[13]  Alberto Di Minin,et al.  Harnessing adaptive capacity to close the pandora’s box of open innovation , 2019, The Influence of Internal Barriers on Open Innovation.

[14]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Ego-Network Stability and Innovation in Alliances , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.

[15]  Sai Yayavaram,et al.  Attenuating the negative effects of network change on innovation: A whole network level analysis of Taiwanese business groups , 2019, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[16]  H. Su,et al.  The curvilinear relationships between structural embeddedness and productive efficiency: An exploratory study , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[17]  Shivam Gupta,et al.  Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance , 2019 .

[18]  A. Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  The impact of cultural diversity on innovation performance of MNC subsidiaries in strategic alliances , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[19]  Antonello Cammarano,et al.  Open innovation practices for knowledge acquisition and their effects on innovation output , 2019, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[20]  Gupeng Zhang,et al.  Examining the moderating effect of technology spillovers embedded in the intra- and inter-regional collaborative innovation networks of China , 2019, Scientometrics.

[21]  R. Huggins,et al.  Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality , 2019, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[22]  M. M. Naqshbandi,et al.  Managing open innovation , 2019, Management Decision.

[23]  V. Kumar,et al.  Understanding the structural characteristics of a firm’s whole buyer–supplier network and its impact on international business performance , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[24]  Wendy L. Tate,et al.  The Influence of Network Exchange Brokers on Sustainable Initiatives in Organizational Networks , 2019 .

[25]  J. Wincent,et al.  Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation , 2019, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.

[26]  Junseok Hwang,et al.  Technology Convergence Capability and Firm Innovation in the Manufacturing Sector: An Approach Based on Patent Network Analysis , 2018, R&D Management.

[27]  Joern Hoppmann,et al.  With a little help from a stranger: The impact of external change agents on corporate sustainability investments , 2018 .

[28]  Dong-Young Kim,et al.  Supplier dependence and R&D intensity: The moderating role of network centrality and interconnectedness , 2018, Journal of Operations Management.

[29]  Hyundo Choi,et al.  Network variations at the intersection of national capability orientation and technological path dependence – patent citation network analysis of the hydrogen energy and nano-tech sectors , 2018 .

[30]  Chengliang Liu,et al.  Does network position foster knowledge production? Evidence from international scientific collaboration network , 2018, Growth and Change.

[31]  Lucía Muñoz-Pascual,et al.  Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[32]  Chaoying Tang,et al.  How R&D partner diversity influences innovation performance: an empirical study in the nano-biopharmaceutical field , 2018, Scientometrics.

[33]  M.M. de Carvalho,et al.  Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[34]  P. Liesch,et al.  Inertia and Managerial Intentionality: Extending the Uppsala Model , 2018 .

[35]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Overcoming the inertia of organizational competence: Olivetti’s transition from mechanical to electronic technology , 2018 .

[36]  Qingpu Zhang,et al.  Inbound open innovation and radical innovation capability , 2018 .

[37]  Yonggui Wang,et al.  Alliance Formation in the Midst of Market and Network: Insights From Resource Dependence and Network Perspectives , 2018 .

[38]  Cheng-Hua Tzeng.  How Domestic Firms Absorb Spillovers: A Routine-Based Model of Absorptive Capacity View , 2018, Management and Organization Review.

[39]  Deli Yang,et al.  Open innovation and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese mechanical manufacturing industry , 2018 .

[40]  Stefan Markovic,et al.  How Does Breadth of External Stakeholder Co-Creation Influence Innovation Performance? Analyzing the Mediating Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Product Innovation , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[41]  Lorenzo Ardito,et al.  Organizing for Continuous Technology Acquisition: The Role of R&D Geographic Dispersion , 2018 .

[42]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies , 2018 .

[43]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Bidirectional relationship between network position and knowledge creation in Scientometrics , 2018, Scientometrics.

[44]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer , 2018 .

[45]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies , 2018 .

[46]  Isabelle M. M. J. Reymen,et al.  Searching for Partners in Open Innovation Settings: How to Overcome the Constraints of Local Search , 2018 .

[47]  Ge Cheng,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: A supervised learning approach through patent analysis , 2017 .

[48]  M. Bogers,et al.  The 'Human Side' of Open Innovation: The Role of Employee Diversity in Firm-Level Openness , 2017 .

[49]  Jian Li,et al.  How does knowledge network affect a firm’s explorative innovation? The contingent role of R&D collaborations , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[50]  C. H. Wang,et al.  The Effect of R&D Alliance Diversity and Network Position on Firm Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Emerging Biotechnology Industry , 2017 .

[51]  J. Yun,et al.  Effect of Distance on Open Innovation: Differences among Institutions According to Patent Citation and Reference , 2017 .

[52]  S. Cooper,et al.  External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms , 2017 .

[53]  Tindara Abbate,et al.  Overcoming cultural barriers in open innovation processes through intermediaries: a theoretical framework , 2017 .

[54]  Michael A. Stanko,et al.  Under the Wide Umbrella of Open Innovation , 2017 .

[55]  John Qi Dong,et al.  How Central Is Too Central? Organizing Interorganizational Collaboration Networks for Breakthrough Innovation , 2017 .

[56]  John Qi Dong,et al.  Information Technology and External Search in the Open Innovation Age : New Findings from Germany , 2017 .

[57]  Chia-Yi Liu,et al.  The relationship between patent attributes and patent litigation: Considering the moderating effects of managerial characteristics , 2017, Asia Pacific Management Review.

[58]  R. Huggins,et al.  Entrepreneurial networks and open innovation: the role of strategic and embedded ties , 2017 .

[59]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs , 2017 .

[60]  Yibo Lyu,et al.  Structural embeddedness and innovation diffusion: the moderating role of industrial technology grouping , 2017, Scientometrics.

[61]  Jibao Gu,et al.  How Do Informal Ties Drive Open Innovation? The Contingency Role of Market Dynamism , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[62]  S. Paruchuri,et al.  Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra‐organizational inventor networks , 2017 .

[63]  Isabel Diez-Vial,et al.  From incubation to maturity inside parks: the evolution of local knowledge networks , 2017, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[64]  Aijun Ruan,et al.  Does formal knowledge search depth benefit Chinese firms’ innovation performance? Effects of network centrality, structural holes, and knowledge tacitness , 2017 .

[65]  John Qi Dong,et al.  Being Central Is a Double-Edged Sword: Knowledge Network Centrality and New Product Development in U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry , 2016 .

[66]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Internal capabilities, external structural holes network positions, and knowledge creation , 2016 .

[67]  Marco Greco,et al.  An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance , 2016 .

[68]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments , 2016 .

[69]  Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.  University–industry relations and research group production: is there a bidirectional relationship? , 2016 .

[70]  Eonsoo Kim,et al.  Balancing absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation for sustained innovative performance: An attention-based view , 2016 .

[71]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Absorptive capacity and firm performance: an integrative framework of benefits and downsides , 2016, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[72]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  How Does Centrality in Coopetition Networks Matter? An Empirical Investigation in the Mobile Telephone Industry , 2016 .

[73]  A. Karamanos,et al.  Effects of a Firm's and Their Partners' Alliance Ego-Network Structure on Its Innovation Output in an Era of Ferment , 2016 .

[74]  Cheng-Yu Lee,et al.  The Double-Edged Sword of Technological Diversity in R&D Alliances: Network Position and Learning Speed as Moderators , 2015 .

[75]  Gaël Le Mens,et al.  Age-Related Structural Inertia: A Distance-Based Approach , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[76]  Se Kyoung Choi,et al.  Antecedents of relational inertia and information sharing in SNS usage: The moderating role of structural autonomy ☆ , 2015 .

[77]  G. M. Castro,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity , 2015 .

[78]  Antonio Capaldo,et al.  Origins of knowledge and innovation in R&D alliances: a contingency approach , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[79]  Weizhou Zhong,et al.  Does inertia matter for parts manufacturers’ innovation? , 2014, Scientometrics.

[80]  John E. Prescott,et al.  When a firm's centrality in R&D alliance network is (not) the answer for invention , 2014 .

[81]  S. Zahra,et al.  Strategic repertoire variety and new venture growth: The moderating effects of origin and industry dynamism , 2014 .

[82]  S. Lioukas,et al.  The Relationship Between Innovation and Diversification in the Case of New Ventures: Unidirectional or Bidirectional? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[83]  Rene M. Bakker,et al.  Built to Last or Meant to End: Intertemporal Choice in Strategic Alliance Portfolios , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[84]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge‐Creating Alliances , 2014 .

[85]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Determinants of Patent Citations in Biotechnology: An Analysis of Patent Influence Across the Industrial and Organizational Boundaries , 2014, ArXiv.

[86]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination , 2013 .

[87]  Hao-Chen Huang,et al.  Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation , 2013 .

[88]  C. Chou,et al.  The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence , 2013 .

[89]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  Exploring the Role of Network Characteristics, Knowledge Quality, and Inertia on the Evolution of Scientific Networks , 2013 .

[90]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation , 2013 .

[91]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  When does centrality matter? Scientific productivity and the moderating role of research specialization and cross‐community ties , 2013 .

[92]  Michael J. Mol,et al.  The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing : the contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity , 2013 .

[93]  Ulrika H. Westergren,et al.  Exploring preconditions for open innovation: Value networks in industrial firms , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[94]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: a study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[95]  Péter Érdi,et al.  Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network , 2012, Scientometrics.

[96]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[97]  A. Karamanos,et al.  Leveraging Micro‐ and Macro‐Structures of Embeddedness in Alliance Networks for Exploratory Innovation in Biotechnology , 2012 .

[98]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[99]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda , 2011 .

[100]  Fernando Jiménez-Sáez,et al.  Mapping the importance of the real world: The validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks , 2011 .

[101]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Leveraging Learning Behavior and Network Structure to Improve Knowledge Gatekeepers’ Performance , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[102]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[103]  Kuang-Peng Hung,et al.  Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Flows , 2010 .

[104]  N. Pangarkar,et al.  The bidirectional relationship between competitive intensity and collaboration: Evidence from China , 2009 .

[105]  Chun-Yao Tseng,et al.  Technological innovation and knowledge network in Asia: Evidence from comparison of information and communication technologies among six countries , 2009 .

[106]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  The Measurement of Economic, Social and Environmental Performance of Countries: A Novel Approach , 2009, Social indicators research.

[107]  P. Verhoef,et al.  Critical Incidents and the Impact of Satisfaction on Customer Share , 2008 .

[108]  C. A. Benavides-Velasco,et al.  Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification , 2008 .

[109]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN CAPITAL: THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL AND RELATIONAL LINKAGES ON FIRM EXECUTION AND INNOVATION , 2008 .

[110]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[111]  J. Bessant,et al.  Finding, Forming, and Performing: Creating Networks for Discontinuous Innovation , 2007 .

[112]  Michael P. Murray.  Avoiding Invalid Instruments and Coping with Weak Instruments , 2006 .

[113]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Impact of Co-Opetition on Firm Competitive Behavior: An Empirical Examination , 2006 .

[114]  A. Swaminathan,et al.  Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective , 2006 .

[115]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[116]  J. Perry-Smith.  Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[117]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[118]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Preferences, Identity, and Competition: Predicting Tie Strength from Demographic Data , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[119]  M. Hannan.  Ecologies of Organizations: Diversity and Identity , 2005 .

[120]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[121]  Tim Rowley,et al.  Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks , 2002 .

[122]  Joel Podolny.  Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[123]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[124]  D. Watts.  Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[125]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[126]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Professional Service Constellations: How Strategies and Capabilities Influence Collaborative Stability and Change , 1998 .

[127]  D. Cvetkovic,et al.  Spectra of Graphs: Theory and Applications , 1997 .

[128]  M. Baldassare,et al.  Overall "Sense of Community" in a Suburban Region , 1996 .

[129]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics , 2018 .

[130]  Hongbo Duan,et al.  Network stability, connectivity and innovation output , 2017 .

[131]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  How do collaborative features affect scientific output? Evidences from wind power field , 2014, Scientometrics.

[132]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis , 2011 .

[133]  Ying Ding,et al.  Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[134]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  The Effects of Repeat Collaboration on Creative Abrasion , 2010 .

[135]  M. V. Shyam Kumar,et al.  The relationship between product and international diversification: the effects of short‐run constraints and endogeneity , 2009 .

[136]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[137]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[138]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .