Screening organic chemicals in commerce for emissions in the context of environmental and human exposure.

Quantitative knowledge of organic chemical release into the environment is essential to understand and predict human exposure as well as to develop rational control strategies for any substances of concern. While significant efforts have been invested to characterize and screen organic chemicals for hazardous properties, relatively less effort has been directed toward estimating emissions and hence also risks. Here, a rapid throughput method to estimate emissions of discrete organic chemicals in commerce has been developed, applied and evaluated to support screening studies aimed at ranking and identifying chemicals of potential concern. The method builds upon information in the European Union Technical Guidance Document and utilizes information on quantities in commerce (production and/or import rates), chemical function (use patterns) and physical-chemical properties to estimate emissions to air, soil and water within the OECD for five stages of the chemical life-cycle. The method is applied to 16,029 discrete substances (identified by CAS numbers) from five national and international high production volume lists. As access to consistent input data remains fragmented or even impossible, particular attention is given to estimating, evaluating and discussing uncertainties in the resulting emission scenarios. The uncertainty for individual substances typically spans 3 to 4 orders of magnitude for this initial tier screening method. Information on uncertainties in emissions is useful as any screening or categorization methods which solely rely on threshold values are at risk of leading to a significant number of either false positives or false negatives. A limited evaluation of the screening method's estimates for a sub-set of about 100 substances, compared against independent and more detailed emission scenarios presented in various European Risk Assessment Reports, highlights that up-to-date and accurate information on quantities in commerce as well as a detailed breakdown on chemical function are critically needed for developing more realistic emission scenarios.

[1]  K. Jones,et al.  Estimation of the production, consumption, and atmospheric emissions of pentabrominated diphenyl ether in Europe between 1970 and 2000. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Frank Wania,et al.  Screening chemicals for the potential to be persistent organic pollutants: a case study of Arctic contaminants. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Knut Breivik,et al.  Emission impossible? The challenge of quantifying sources and releases of POPs into the environment. , 2002, Environment international.

[4]  Marianne Thomsen,et al.  Using multiple regression in estimating (semi) VOC emissions and concentrations at the European scale , 2010 .

[5]  Mats Tysklind,et al.  A multivariate chemical map of industrial chemicals--assessment of various protocols for identification of chemicals of potential concern. , 2009, Chemosphere.

[6]  D. Muir,et al.  Global fate of POPs: current and future research directions. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[7]  D. Mackay,et al.  Policies for chemical hazard and risk priority setting: can persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and quantity information be combined? , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  E. Hubal,et al.  Exposure-based prioritization of chemicals for risk assessment , 2011 .

[9]  Henrik Sundberg,et al.  Global accounting of PCBs in the continental shelf sediments. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Michael S McLachlan,et al.  Bioaccumulation potential of persistent organic chemicals in humans. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Screening and ranking of POPs for global half-life: QSAR approaches for prioritization based on molecular structure. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Kevin C Jones,et al.  Are reductions in industrial organic contaminants emissions in rich countries achieved partly by export of toxic wastes? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Emma Undeman,et al.  Evaluation of a novel high throughput screening tool for relative emissions of industrial chemicals used in chemical products. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[14]  Kevin C Jones,et al.  A first global production, emission, and environmental inventory for perfluorooctane sulfonate. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  J. Pacyna,et al.  Atmospheric emissions of some POPs in Europe: a discussion of existing inventories and data needs , 2006 .

[16]  Ian T Cousins,et al.  Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Jon A Arnot,et al.  Screening level risk assessment model for chemical fate and effects in the environment. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  D. Mackay,et al.  Kenneth Mellanby Review Award. Bioaccumulation of persistent organic chemicals: mechanisms and models. , 2000, Environmental pollution.

[19]  J. Pacyna,et al.  Towards a global historical emission inventory for selected PCB congeners--a mass balance approach. 1. Global production and consumption. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Kevin C Jones,et al.  The global re-cycling of persistent organic pollutants is strongly retarded by soils. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[21]  Frank Wania,et al.  Assessment of chemical screening outcomes based on different partitioning property estimation methods. , 2010, Environment international.

[22]  K. Jones,et al.  Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): state of the science. , 1999, Environmental pollution.

[23]  Martin Scheringer,et al.  Persistence and Spatial Range as Endpoints of an Exposure-Based Assessment of Organic Chemicals , 1996 .

[24]  P. Howard,et al.  Are there other persistent organic pollutants? A challenge for environmental chemists. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Frank Wania,et al.  Evaluating environmental persistence , 1998 .

[26]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Assessments of Direct Human Exposure—The Approach of EU Risk Assessments Compared to Scenario‐Based Risk Assessment , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  L S McCarty,et al.  On the validity of classifying chemicals for persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and potential for long‐range transport , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[28]  S. Trapp,et al.  An unexpected challenge: ionizable compounds in the REACH chemical space , 2010 .

[29]  D. Mackay,et al.  Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next? , 1998, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[30]  Frank A. P. C. Gobas,et al.  A review of bioconcentration factor (BCF) and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) assessments for organic chemicals in aquatic organisms , 2006 .

[31]  G Heinemeyer,et al.  European union system for the evaluation of substances: the second version. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[32]  James Vail,et al.  The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Frank Wania,et al.  Peer reviewed: tracking the distribution of persistent organic pollutants. , 1996, Environmental science & technology.