Democratisation of the SmartGrid and the active participation of prosumers

We observe that SmartGrids are an example of a crossover point where cyber-physical systems meet socio-technical systems. However, control of this crossover point, in the form of a peer-to-peer platform, is a contentious issue. We argue that if the platform is ‘closed’ it can lead to an asymmetry in the distribution of power and information that can inhibit successful collective action. Instead, an ‘open’ platform is required: this entails the ‘democratisation’ of the SmartGrid by unbundling the SmartMeter and enabling a prosumer-centric ICT layer. This ICT layer can support, for example, collective action through the self-management and distribution of both data and energy, various forms of self-organisation and governance, and the promotion and preservation of values. This argument generalises to other socio-technical/cyber-physical systems, for example for architecture, urban mobility and other infrastructure management. Therefore we conclude that to encourage active participation of citizens in different roles, in order to help communities address collective action problems or self-organise local arrangements, then we need open, participatory platforms which represent values congruently, distribute power fairly, and manage knowledge transparently.

[1]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Self-organising management of user-generated data and knowledge , 2014, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[2]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[3]  Ada Diaconescu,et al.  On the Minimal Recognition of Rights in Holonic Institutions , 2016, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.

[4]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Axiomatization of Socio-Economic Principles for Self-Organizing Institutions: Concepts, Experiments and Challenges , 2012, TAAS.

[5]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[6]  Alexander Artikis Dynamic specification of open agent systems , 2012, J. Log. Comput..

[7]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  The pursuit of computational justice in open systems , 2015, AI & SOCIETY.

[8]  Maite López-Sánchez,et al.  Transforming Big Data into Collective Awareness , 2013, Computer.

[9]  M. Atzori Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary? , 2017 .

[10]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Procedural Justice and 'Fitness for Purpose' of Self-organising Electronic Institutions , 2013, PRIMA.

[11]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Distributive Justice for Self-Organised Common-Pool Resource Management , 2014, TAAS.

[12]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[13]  Kenneth L. Artis Design for a Brain , 1961 .

[14]  Leslie Lamport,et al.  The part-time parliament , 1998, TOCS.

[15]  Mircea Eremia,et al.  Integrating the Electrical Vehicles in the Smart Grid through unbundled Smart Metering and multi-objective Virtual Power Plants , 2011, 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies.

[16]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[17]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  An Agent-Based Serious Game for Decentralised Community Energy Systems , 2014, PRIMA.

[18]  M. Wigan Smart meter technology tradeoffs , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Technology and Society in Asia (T&SA).

[19]  W. Lam,et al.  Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action , 1998 .

[20]  Ada Diaconescu,et al.  Holonic Institutions for Multi-scale Polycentric Self-governance , 2014, COIN@AAMAS/PRICAI.

[21]  E. Ostrom Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems , 2010, American Economic Review.

[22]  Dan W. Brockt,et al.  The Theory of Justice , 2017 .

[23]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Collective Intelligence and Algorithmic Governance of Socio-Technical Systems , 2014 .

[24]  M. Wendy Hennequin,et al.  The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It , 2011 .

[25]  Ada Diaconescu,et al.  Technological Impacts in Socio-Technical Communities: Values and Pathologies , 2017, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[26]  Nagarajan Kandasamy,et al.  Power and performance management of virtualized computing environments via lookahead control , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Autonomic Computing.

[27]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Experiments with Social Capital in Multi-agent Systems , 2014, PRIMA.