Modeling Reader and Text Interactions During Narrative Comprehension: A Test of the Lexical Quality Hypothesis

The goal of this study was to examine predictions derived from the Lexical Quality Hypothesis regarding relations among word decoding, working-memory capacity, and the ability to integrate new concepts into a developing discourse representation. Hierarchical Linear Modeling was used to quantify the effects of three text properties (length, frequency, and number of new concepts) on reading times of focal and spillover sentences, with variance in those effects estimated as a function of individual difference factors (decoding, vocabulary, print exposure, and working-memory capacity). The analysis revealed complex, cross-level interactions that complement the Lexical Quality Hypothesis.

[1]  Whitney Tabor,et al.  Speaking Up for Vocabulary , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  C. Perfetti,et al.  The lexical quality hypothesis , 2002 .

[4]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[5]  A. Miyake,et al.  Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[6]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[7]  D. Gorfein.  On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. , 2001 .

[8]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[9]  J. B. Wyman,et al.  What is reading ability , 1921 .

[10]  Eric Nils Lundquist.  Phonological complexity, decoding, and text comprehension , 2003 .

[11]  Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow,et al.  Age Differences in the Effects of Conceptual Integration Training on Resource Allocation in Sentence Processing , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Comprehension Skill and Word-to-Text Integration Processes , 2008 .

[13]  James A. Thurber,et al.  Fables for Our Time , 1952 .

[14]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[15]  N. Landi.  An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults , 2010, Reading and writing.

[16]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[17]  A C Graesser,et al.  Reading strategies of fast and slow readers. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Less skilled comprehenders’ ERPs show sluggish word-to-text integration processes , 2005 .

[19]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[20]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Exposure to print and orthographic processing. , 1989 .

[22]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Phases of development in learning to read words by sight , 1995 .

[23]  Clinton L. Johns,et al.  The importance of knowledge in vivid text memory: An individual-differences investigation of recollection and familiarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  James I. Brown.  The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[25]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[26]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Effects of task and new arguments on word reading times , 1986 .

[27]  Jolyn Hersch,et al.  Lexical Quality and Reading Skill: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Contributions to Sentence Processing , 2012 .

[28]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  J-F Roulet.  The importance of knowledge. , 2009, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[30]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[31]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The lexical basis of comprehension skill. , 2001 .

[32]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[34]  Ron Carlson.  A Kind of Flying: Selected Stories , 2003 .

[35]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading skill: some adult comparisons , 1994 .