Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge

The paper offers theoretical support for research through design (RtD) by arguing that in order to legitimize and make use of research through design as research, HCI researchers need to explore and clarify how RtD objects might contribute to knowledge. Leveraging the tradition of aesthetics in the arts and humanities, we argue that while the intentions of the object's designer are important and while annotations are a good mechanism to articulate them, the critical reception of objects is equally foundational to RtD's broader knowledge impacts within HCI. Such a scholarly critical reception is needed precisely because of the potential inexhaustibility of design objects' meanings; their inability to be paraphrased simply and adequately. Offering a multilevel analysis of the (critical) design fiction Menstruation Machine by Sputniko!, the paper explores how design objects co-produce knowledge, by working through complex design problem spaces in non-reductive ways, proposing new connections and distinctions, and embodying design ideas and processes across time and minds.

[1]  A. Abt.  Aesthetics Of Appearing , 2016 .

[2]  Kirsten Day,et al.  Windows and Mirrors , 2015 .

[3]  Anna Vallgårda,et al.  Ajna: negotiating forms in the making of a musical cabinet , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design , 2014, CHI.

[5]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  Always somewhere, never there: using critical design to understand database interactions , 2014, CHI.

[6]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts , 2014, CHI.

[7]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research Through Design in HCI , 2014, Ways of Knowing in HCI.

[8]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[9]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[10]  C. DiSalvo,et al.  FCJ-142 Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures , 2012 .

[11]  John Bowers,et al.  The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design' , 2012, DIS '12.

[12]  William W. Gaver.  What should we expect from research through design? , 2012, CHI.

[13]  P. Verbeek.  Politics at Issue. On Art and the Democratization of Things. , 2012 .

[14]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[15]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research through Practice , 2011 .

[16]  Stan Ruecker,et al.  How a prototype argues , 2010, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[17]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[18]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Concept-Driven Interaction Design Research , 2010, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Peter Dalsgård.  Research in and through design: an interaction design research approach , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[20]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics , 2009, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[21]  C. Todd.  Fiction and the weave of life , 2009 .

[22]  Lone Koefoed Hansen,et al.  Embodied imagination: a hybrid method of designing for intimacy , 2007, Digit. Creativity.

[23]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[24]  Steven DeCaroli,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics , 2006 .

[25]  Martin Ludvigsen.  Designing for social interaction: an experimental design research project , 2006, DIS '06.

[26]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The design way , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[28]  Olav W. Bertelsen,et al.  Criticism as an approach to interface aesthetics , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[29]  Diane Gromala,et al.  Windows and Mirrors - Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency , 2003 .

[30]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[31]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[32]  R. Eldridge.  An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art: Acknowledgments , 2003 .

[33]  A. Brew.  The nature of research , 2001 .

[34]  Vilem Flusser,et al.  On the Word Design: An Etymological Essay , 1995 .

[35]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design , 1989, CHI '89.

[36]  Ingrid Stadler,et al.  An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art , 1988 .

[37]  N. Goodman.  Languages of Art , 1968 .

[38]  M. Uprichard.  The nature of research. , 1959, The Canadian nurse.

[39]  M. Weitz,et al.  Philosophy of the Arts. , 1951 .