Crowdworkers’ Temporal Flexibility is Being Traded for the Convenience of Requesters Through 19 ‘Invisible Mechanisms’ Employed by Crowdworking Platforms: A Comparative Analysis Study of Nine Platforms

Crowdworking platforms are a prime example of a product that sells flexibility to its consumers. In this paper, we argue that crowdworking platforms sell temporal flexibility to requesters to the detriment of workers. We begin by identifying a list of 19 features employed by crowdworking platforms that facilitate the trade of temporal flexibility from crowdworkers to requesters. Using the list of features, we conduct a comparative analysis of nine crowdworking platforms available to U.S.-based workers, in which we describe key differences and similarities between the platforms. We find that crowdworking platforms strongly favour features that promote requesters’ temporal flexibility over workers’ by limiting the predictability of workers’ working hours and restricting paid time. Further, we identify which platforms employ the highest number of features that facilitate the trade of temporal flexibility from workers to requesters, consequently increasing workers’ temporal precarity. We conclude the paper by discussing the implications of the results.

[1]  Sandy J. J. Gould Consumption experiences in the research process , 2022, CHI.

[2]  Saiph Savage,et al.  Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd Work , 2021, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Kate Crawford Atlas of AI , 2021, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith.

[4]  David Johnstone,et al.  Taking rejection personally: An ethical analysis of work rejection on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2020 .

[5]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Thinking Out of the Box: Fair Work for Platform Workers , 2020, King's Law Journal.

[6]  Saiph Savage,et al.  Becoming the Super Turker:Increasing Wages via a Strategy from High Earning Workers , 2020, WWW.

[7]  Lynn Dombrowski,et al.  Worker-Centered Design: Expanding HCI Methods for Supporting Labor , 2020, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  U. Rani,et al.  Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers , 2020, Competition & Change.

[9]  Mohammad Amir Anwar,et al.  Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa , 2020, Competition & Change.

[10]  Mark Graham,et al.  The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction , 2020 .

[11]  Saraleah Fordyce Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination , 2019, Design and Culture.

[12]  Edward Lank,et al.  The Perpetual Work Life of Crowdworkers , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Fair Work: Crowd Work Minimum Wage with One Line of Code , 2019, HCOMP.

[14]  Moritz Altenried The platform as factory: Crowdwork and the hidden labour behind artificial intelligence , 2019, Capital & Class.

[15]  Mary L. Gray,et al.  Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass , 2019 .

[16]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Monotasking or Multitasking: Designing for Crowdworkers' Preferences , 2019, CHI.

[17]  B. Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms , 2019 .

[18]  Fabian Flöck,et al.  Characterizing the Global Crowd Workforce: A Cross-Country Comparison of Crowdworker Demographics , 2018, Hum. Comput..

[19]  Ellie Harmon,et al.  Digital labour platforms and the future of work , 2018 .

[20]  Mark Graham,et al.  Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy , 2018, Work, employment & society : a journal of the British Sociological Association.

[21]  Lilly Irani,et al.  Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.

[22]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Rating Working Conditions on Digital Labor Platforms , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  Ming Yin,et al.  Running Out of Time: The Impact and Value of Flexibility in On-Demand Crowdwork , 2018, CHI.

[24]  Vili Lehdonvirta,et al.  Flexibility in the Gig Economy: Managing Time on Three Online Piecework Platforms , 2018 .

[25]  Rebecca Foust how it works , 2017, The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative.

[26]  Chris Callison-Burch,et al.  A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers' Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2017, CHI.

[27]  C. Hoffmann,et al.  Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms , 2017, Journal of Business Ethics.

[28]  Pamela J. Wisniewski,et al.  Parental Control vs. Teen Self-Regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety? , 2017, CSCW.

[29]  Peter Fleming,et al.  The Human Capital Hoax: Work, Debt and Insecurity in the Era of Uberization , 2017 .

[30]  Daniel Cockayne,et al.  Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy , 2016 .

[31]  Jan Mischke,et al.  Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy , 2016 .

[32]  S. Stumpp,et al.  Rebalancing Interests and Power Structures on Crowdworking Platforms , 2016 .

[33]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Diminished Control in Crowdsourcing , 2016, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[34]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  The Duality of Empowerment and Marginalization in Microtask Crowdsourcing: Giving Voice to the Less Powerful Through Value Sensitive Design , 2016, MIS Q..

[35]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Taking a HIT: Designing around Rejection, Mistrust, Risk, and Workers' Experiences in Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2016, CHI.

[36]  Janine Berg,et al.  Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers , 2016 .

[37]  Mary L. Gray,et al.  Accounting for Market Frictions and Power Asymmetries in Online Labor Markets , 2015 .

[38]  Valerio De Stefano The rise of the "just-in-time workforce": on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy" , 2015 .

[39]  Stefan Dietze,et al.  Understanding Malicious Behavior in Crowdsourcing Platforms: The Case of Online Surveys , 2015, CHI.

[40]  S. Briscoe Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[41]  B. Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  Amazon Mechanical Turk and the Commodification of Labour , 2014 .

[42]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  From critical design to critical infrastructure: lessons from turkopticon , 2014, INTR.

[43]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Being a turker , 2014, CSCW.

[44]  Matthew Lease,et al.  Beyond AMT: An Analysis of Crowd Work Platforms , 2013, ArXiv.

[45]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk , 2013, CHI.

[46]  David B. Grusky,et al.  Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. By Arne L. Kalleberg. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011. Pp. xvi+292. $37.50. , 2012 .

[47]  Julie Allen The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2012 .

[48]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  (Whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long- distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context , 2011, CSCW.

[49]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[50]  Batya Friedman Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[51]  J. Drahokoupil,et al.  A Modern Guide To Labour and the Platform Economy , 2021 .

[52]  J. Messenger Working time and the future of work , 2018 .

[53]  David B. Martin,et al.  Understanding the Crowd: Ethical and Practical Matters in the Academic Use of Crowdsourcing , 2015, Crowdsourcing and Human-Centered Experiments.

[54]  J. Dijck The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[55]  L. Dresser Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s , 2012 .

[56]  Amanda Spink,et al.  A Study of Web Search Trends , 2004, Webology.

[57]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[58]  UC Hastings Scholarship Repository UC Hastings Scholarship Repository The Time Politics of Home-Based Digital Piecework The Time Politics of Home-Based Digital Piecework , 2022 .