A Time Use Diary Study of Adult Everyday Writing Behavior

The present study documents everyday adult writing by type of text and medium (computer or paper) in an in vivo diary study. The authors compare writing patterns by gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, age and working status. The study results reveal that (a) writing time varied with demographic variables for networkers, but these variations disappear for workers; (b) all demographic groups spent more time writing documents than prose; (c) most demographic groups spent an equal amount of time writing using computers and paper, but younger and higher educated groups spent more writing time on the computer, while older and less educated groups spent more time writing using paper than the computer; and (d) workers spent more time writing using computers than paper. Implications of the study findings are discussed, and suggestions for future research are also given.

[1]  David Barton,et al.  Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language , 1994 .

[2]  A. Paton.  WAYS WITH WORDS , 1995 .

[3]  Jennie Nelson,et al.  This Was an Easy Assignment: Examining How Students Interpret Academic Writing Tasks , 1990 .

[4]  Christina Haas,et al.  'What did I just say?’ Reading problems in writing with the machine , 1986 .

[5]  Observations on the Psychology of Thinking and Writing. , 1993 .

[6]  Catherine F. Schryer,et al.  Records as Genre , 1993 .

[7]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes , 1994 .

[8]  Christina Haas,et al.  Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy , 1995 .

[9]  Arthur N. Applebee.  Writing and Reasoning , 1984 .

[10]  R. Golledge.  Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes , 2010 .

[11]  R. Munger.  Emergency Medical Technician Run Reports: A Study of Genre, Practice, and Reflection , 1999 .

[12]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[13]  Hiromi Ono,et al.  2. An Assessment of Alternative Measures of Time Use , 2003 .

[14]  R. T. Kellogg.  The Psychology of Writing , 1994 .

[15]  Dale J. Cohen,et al.  The Relations Between Document Familiarity, Frequency, and Prevalence and Document Literacy Performance Among Adult Readers , 2008 .

[16]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .

[17]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community , 1998 .

[18]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .

[19]  S. Parr.  Everyday reading and writing practices of normal adults: Implications for aphasia assessment , 1992 .

[20]  Hayes.  identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .

[21]  Deborah Brandt,et al.  Literacy in American Lives: BIBLIOGRAPHY , 2001 .

[22]  Stephen P. Witte.  Context, Text, Intertext , 1992 .

[23]  M. Cole,et al.  The psychology of literacy , 1983 .

[24]  D. Smith,et al.  The Social Construction of Documentary Reality1 , 1974 .

[25]  J. Kalman.  Everyday Paperwork: Literacy Practices in the Daily Life of Unschooled and Underschooled Women in a Semiurban Community of Mexico City , 2001 .