The Burden of Proof and Its Role in Argumentation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Gaskins. Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse , 1993 .
[2] F. Kauffeld. Pivotal Issues and Norms in Rhetorical Theories of Argumentation , 2002 .
[3] A. Feeney,et al. The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[4] J. Räikkä. Burden of Proof Rules in Social Criticism , 1997 .
[5] T. Govier. A practical study of argument , 1985 .
[6] Frank Boardman,et al. Logic and contemporary rhetoric , 1971 .
[7] Bart Verheij,et al. Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Book Review) , 2001, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[8] Alex C. Michalos. Principles of logic , 1969 .
[9] D. Walton. Arguments From Ignorance , 1995 .
[10] Douglas Walton,et al. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument , 1998 .
[11] Irving M. Copi,et al. Introduction to Logic , 1962 .
[12] Douglas Walton,et al. Burden of proof , 1988 .
[13] Ralph H. Johnson. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument , 2000 .
[14] J. A. Blair,et al. Anyone Who Has a View , 2003 .
[15] Henry Prakken,et al. Dialogues about the burden of proof , 2005, ICAIL '05.
[16] Douglas Walton,et al. Is there a Burden of Questioning? , 2004, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[17] J. Kokott. The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights Law , 1998 .
[18] M. Oaksford,et al. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. , 2007, Psychological review.
[19] A. Zuckerman. The principles of criminal evidence , 1989 .
[20] Nicholas Rescher,et al. Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .
[21] F. Kauffeld,et al. Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing , 1998 .
[22] F. Kauffeld,et al. The Ordinary Practice of Presuming and Presumption with Special Attention to Veracity and the Burden of Proof , 2003 .
[23] J. A. Blair,et al. Anyone who has a view : theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation , 2003 .
[24] F. H. Eemeren,et al. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .
[25] H. Raiffa,et al. Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory , 1996 .
[26] Ulrike Hahn,et al. A Bayesian Approach to Informal Argument Fallacies , 2006, Synthese.
[27] C. Lumer. Practical Arguments for Theoretical Theses , 1997 .
[28] Kevin B. Korb,et al. Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy , 2004 .
[29] F. H. Eemeren,et al. Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch) , 1984 .
[30] T. Govier. Arguing Forever? Or: Two Tiers of Argument Appraisal , 1997 .
[31] F. H. van Eemeren,et al. Advances in Pragma Dialectics , 2002 .
[32] M. Oaksford,et al. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.