Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world.

Functional and phylogenetic diversity are increasingly quantified in various fields of ecology and conservation biology. The need to maintain diversity turnover among sites, so-called beta-diversity, has also been raised in theoretical and applied ecology. In this study, we propose the first comprehensive framework for the large-scale mapping of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity and of their respective turnover. Using high-resolution data on the spatial distribution and abundance of birds at a country scale, we disentangled areas of mismatches and congruencies between biodiversity components. We further revealed unequal representation of each component in protected areas: functional diversity was significantly under-represented whereas taxonomic diversity was significantly over-represented in protected areas. Our results challenge the use of any one diversity component as a surrogate for other components and stress the need to adopt an integrative approach to biodiversity conservation.

[1]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain , 1992 .

[2]  Denis Couvet,et al.  Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[3]  T. Brooks,et al.  Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[4]  L. Jost.  Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. , 2007, Ecology.

[5]  C. Graham,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[6]  M. Hill,et al.  PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF TAXONOMIC DATA WITH MULTI-STATE DISCRETE CHARACTERS , 1976 .

[7]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Spatial turnover in the global avifauna , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Additive Partitioning of Species Diversity across Multiple Spatial Scales: Implications for Regional Conservation of Biodiversity , 2003 .

[9]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale , 2001 .

[10]  Richard Grenyer,et al.  Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots , 2007, Nature.

[11]  F. Médail,et al.  Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting Global Conservation Priorities , 1999 .

[12]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[13]  W. Jetz,et al.  Linking global turnover of species and environments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  K. Jønsson,et al.  A phylogenetic supertree of oscine passerine birds (Aves: Passeri) , 2006 .

[15]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  J. Losos.  Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[17]  A. Møller,et al.  Sociality, age at first reproduction and senescence: comparative analyses of birds. , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[19]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  C. Graham,et al.  Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology , 2005 .

[22]  C. Krajewski.  Phylogeny and Diversity , 1991, Science.

[23]  I. Kühn,et al.  Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[24]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Preserving the Tree of Life , 2003, Science.

[26]  J. Schaminée,et al.  Less lineages - more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[27]  R. Lande.  Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities , 1996 .

[28]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Using Phylogenetic, Functional and Trait Diversity to Understand Patterns of Plant Community Productivity , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[30]  B. Emerson,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  D. Mouillot,et al.  Towards a consensus for calculating dendrogram-based functional diversity indices , 2008 .

[32]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Low functional diversity and no redundancy in British avian assemblages. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[33]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[34]  A. Chao,et al.  Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses , 2010 .

[35]  P. White,et al.  Putting Beta-Diversity on the Map: Broad-Scale Congruence and Coincidence in the Extremes , 2007, PLoS biology.

[36]  Ç. Şekercioğlu.  Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  J. Jankowski,et al.  Beta diversity along environmental gradients: implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[38]  W. Jetz,et al.  Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[40]  D. Faith.  Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[41]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[42]  A. Flecker,et al.  Loss of a Harvested Fish Species Disrupts Carbon Flow in a Diverse Tropical River , 2006, Science.

[43]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[44]  G. Cumming,et al.  Contrasting spatial patterns of taxonomic and functional richness offer insights into potential loss of ecosystem services , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Diversity partitioning of Rao's quadratic entropy. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[46]  W. Barthlott,et al.  A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  G. Thomas.  Phylogenetic distributions of British birds of conservation concern , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Additive partitioning of Rao's quadratic diversity: a hierarchical approach , 2005 .

[49]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[50]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.