Development of Taiwanese government’s climate policy after the Kyoto protocol: Applying policy network theory as an analytical framework

Abstract Given its limited involvement in and recognition by international organizations, Taiwan is not presently a signatory to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) or the Kyoto Protocol. The objective of this study is to analyze how and the extent to which changes in an exogenous factor, namely the Kyoto Protocol and Post-Kyoto climate negotiations, affect and ultimately lead to the formulation of and changes in the Taiwanese government׳s climate policy. This study applies policy network theory to examine the development of and changes in the Taiwanese government׳s climate policy. The results demonstrate that international climate agreements and negotiations play a key role in the development of, changes to, and transformation of Taiwan׳s climate policy. Scarce evidence was found in this study to demonstrate that domestic or internal factors affect climate change policy. Despite its lack of participation in the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, Taiwan has adopted national climate change strategies, action plans, and programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, these climate policies and measures are fairly passive and aim to only conform to the minimal requirements for developing countries under international climate agreements and negotiations. This process results in inconsistent and variable climate policies, targets, and regulations.

[1]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Policy progress in mitigation of climate change in Taiwan , 2011 .

[2]  David Marsh,et al.  Policy Communities and Issue Networks: Beyond Typology , 2002 .

[3]  Chea-Yuan Young,et al.  Review of Taiwan's climate policy after Copenhagen ☆ , 2011 .

[4]  Diana Rizzolio.  Text of the Convention , 2008 .

[5]  T. Dye.  Understanding Public Policy , 1972 .

[6]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang.  Promotional policy for renewable energy development in Taiwan , 2010 .

[7]  Jeremy Richardson,et al.  Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change , 2000 .

[8]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[9]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Climate Change 2007 : Synthesis Report : An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2008 .

[10]  H. Compston.  Policy Networks and Policy Change: Putting Policy Network Theory to the Test , 2009 .

[11]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[12]  David Richards,et al.  The tangled webs of Westminster and Whitehall : the discourse, strategy and practice of networking within the British core executive , 2000 .

[13]  M. Thatcher,et al.  The Development of Policy Network Analyses , 1998 .

[14]  J. E. Anderson.  Public policy-making , 1975 .

[15]  Hwa Meei Liou,et al.  Policies and legislation driving Taiwan's development of renewable energy , 2010 .

[16]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  How to support growth with less energy , 2008 .

[17]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks , 1998 .

[18]  R. Rhodes,et al.  Policy Network Analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[20]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[21]  J. F. M. Koppenjan,et al.  Public Management and Policy Networks , 2000 .

[22]  G. Stoker.  Governance as theory: five propositions , 1998 .

[23]  H. Compston.  King Trends and the Future of Public Policy , 2006 .