Towards Human-Robotic Collaboration: Observing Teamwork of Experienced Surgeons in Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Current robotic systems in surgery are telemanipulators, but the future will likely be more automated. Past and current developments literally put the robotic system at the center of the action, and force the surgical team to adapt to it. In addition to important advantages of robotic surgery, empirical studies identify serious disadvantages in sensory perception and team communication, leading to decreased situational awareness among the surgeon and the team. We therefore raise two interrelated questions: Which actors of a surgical team should be part of a controlled, semi-automated robotic assistance and how should the collaborative interaction between the actors (including the robot) be designed. Previous research has examined the situation awareness in robotic-assisted surgeries with bedside assistant, being either residents or specifically trained registered nurse first assistants, with advantages of one over the other. We built on this work by observing for the first time robotic-assisted surgeries with highly experienced bedside assistants, senior surgeons. We found that a senior surgeon in this role excelled once again, for example, through lively medical discussions and independent problem solving, and was more likely to give us clues about a thoughtful development of semi-autonomous, collaborative surgical robots. These new insights will form the basis for subsequent interviews in which surgical teams will reflect on their expectations of the robotic agency. Our overarching goal is then to translate the results into new user interface designs for robotic surgery through repeated cycles of participatory design workshops and expert evaluations.

[1]  Andrew R. Jamieson,et al.  Rethinking Autonomous Surgery: Focusing on Enhancement over Autonomy. , 2021, European urology focus.

[2]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Sensing (Co)operations , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  A Review of Guidance Approaches in Visual Data Analysis: A Multifocal Perspective , 2019, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[4]  G. Bailly,et al.  Impacts of Telemanipulation in Robotic Assisted Surgery , 2019, CHI.

[5]  Paul Reedy Education and training , 1988, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Operating at a Distance - How a Teleoperated Surgical Robot Reconfigures Teamwork in the Operating Room , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Jing Yang,et al.  Guidance in the human-machine analytics process , 2018, Vis. Informatics.

[8]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  A review of the nature and effects of guidance design features , 2017, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  A. Pearman,et al.  Embedding robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication and decision making: a review of the experience of surgical teams , 2016, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[10]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Training situational awareness to reduce surgical errors in the operating room , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. , 2007, Surgery.

[12]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Distributed cognition in the heart room: How situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  N A Stanton,et al.  Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology , 2006, Ergonomics.

[14]  Shirley Martin,et al.  The Role of the First Assistant in Robotic Assisted Surgery , 2004, British journal of perioperative nursing : the journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses.

[15]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decisional Guidance for Computer-Based Decision Support , 1991, MIS Q..

[19]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Characterizing Guidance in Visual Analytics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Vipul R. Patel,et al.  Robotic Urologic Surgery , 2007 .

[21]  William R. Hendee,et al.  To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System , 2001 .

[22]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  To Err is Human , 2000 .

[23]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .