How to effectively sample the plankton size spectrum? A case study using FlowCAM

Any technique developed to enumerate plankton must take into account the size structure of the plankton community. Automatic sampling devices must be capable of analysing a minimum number of cells of the largest size to cover the whole size range intended to be sampled effectively. The Flow Cytometer And Microscope (FLowCAM ® ) has been used in the last decade to estimate the size structure of the plankton community Few attempts, however, have been made to compare FlowCAM measurements with the results provided by traditional microscopy methods for size-structure estimations. FlowCAM can operate in three working modes: autoimage, fluorescence triggered and side-scatter triggered. Autoimage and fluorescence triggered cannot only count accurately a mono-specific suspension of cells, but they are also useful to estimate the size structure of natural samples. The side-scatter-triggered mode is not effective to estimate the size structure of natural samples, although it can count a sparse mono-specific solution accurately. The analysis of natural samples with FlowCAM requires a planned pre-processing of the samples to adjust the density of triggering particles (concentrating or diluting the sample) and to pre-filtrate the sample to avoid cell clumping or obstruction of the flow chamber. The size structure obtained with FlowCAM and with microscopy counts on preserved samples are comparable. Sample preservation, however, alters the size structure of the sample, which suggests that results based on preserved samples must be taken with caution. Automatic sampling devices like FlowCAM could provide a more precise analysis of plankton communities, increasing the resolution of surveys and avoiding the effects of preservation and sample storage.

[1]  Raphael M. Kudela,et al.  The potential role of anthropogenically derived nitrogen in the growth of harmful algae in California, USA , 2008 .

[2]  S. Strom,et al.  Effects of Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae) on protist grazers: laboratory experiments with ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates , 2005 .

[3]  P. Wiebe,et al.  Patterns and Processes in the Time-Space Scales of Plankton Distributions , 1978 .

[4]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Life-stage-specific differences in exploitation of food mixtures: diet mixing enhances copepod egg production but not juvenile development , 2006 .

[5]  P. Burkill,et al.  A comparison of fixatives for the estimation of abundance and biovolume of marine planktonic ciliate populations , 1994 .

[6]  E. Buskey,et al.  Effects of the red tide dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis, on grazing and fecundity in the copepod Acartia tonsa , 2007 .

[7]  Dariusz Stramski,et al.  Measurements and characterization of particle size distributions in coastal waters , 2010 .

[8]  S. Menden‐Deuer,et al.  Effect of preservation on dinoflagellate and diatom cell volume, and consequences for carbon biomass predictions , 2001 .

[9]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Latitudinal variation in plankton size spectra in the Atlantic Ocean , 2006 .

[10]  C. Devey,et al.  Introduction to the InterRidge Special Issue , 2007 .

[11]  H. Utermöhl Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik , 1958 .

[12]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Larval growth in the dominant polychaete Polydora ciliata is food-limited in a eutrophic Danish estuary (Isefjord) , 2010 .

[13]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Variation in the transfer of energy in marine plankton along a productivity gradient in the Atlantic Ocean , 2006 .

[14]  Wayne S Gardner,et al.  Estuarine Microbial Food Web Patterns in a Lake Erie Coastal Wetland , 2004, Microbial Ecology.

[15]  B. Willis,et al.  Methods for sampling free-living Symbiodinium (zooxanthellae) and their distribution and abundance at Lizard Island (Great Barrier Reef) , 2008 .

[16]  R. Sandaa,et al.  Bacterial community composition in an Arctic phytoplankton mesocosm bloom: the impact of silicate and glucose , 2010, Polar Biology.

[17]  F. Echevarría,et al.  Dealing with size-spectra: some conceptual and mathematical problems , 1994 .

[18]  John H. Steele,et al.  Spatial Pattern in Plankton Communities , 2013 .

[19]  P. Utgoff,et al.  RAPID: Research on Automated Plankton Identification , 2007 .

[20]  E. Buskey How does eutrophication affect the role of grazers in harmful algal bloom dynamics , 2008 .

[21]  G. Pohnert,et al.  Growth phase of the diatom Skeletonema marinoi influences the metabolic profile of the cells and the selective feeding of the copepod Calanus spp. , 2010 .

[22]  Mati Kahru,et al.  New approaches and technologies for observing harmful algal blooms , 2005 .

[23]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  High resilience of two coastal plankton communities to twenty-first century seawater acidification: Evidence from microcosm studies , 2010 .

[24]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Effects of Lugol's fixation on the size structure of natural nano-microplankton samples, analyzed by means of an automatic counting method , 2008 .

[25]  Norman L. Guinasso,et al.  COMBINING NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR DETERMINATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO 1 , 2005 .

[26]  Xabier Irigoien,et al.  Changes in plankton size structure and composition, during the generation of a phytoplankton bloom, in the central Cantabrian sea. , 2008 .

[27]  Hongbin Liu,et al.  Grazing by the calanoid copepod Neocalanus cristatus on the microbial food web in the coastal Gulf of Alaska , 2005 .

[28]  J. Burt,et al.  Tropical harmful algal blooms: an emerging threat to coral reef communities? , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[29]  L. Tauxe,et al.  Depositional remanent magnetization: Toward an improved theoretical and experimental foundation , 2006 .

[30]  William M. Balch,et al.  Light backscattering properties of marine phytoplankton: relationships to cell size, chemical composition and taxonomy , 2004 .

[31]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Mapping plankton distribution in the Bay of Biscay during three consecutive spring surveys , 2007 .

[32]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Particles in the OCEAN1 , 1972 .

[33]  Charles S. Yentsch,et al.  An imaging-in-flow system for automated analysis of marine microplankton , 1998 .

[34]  M. C. Sterling,et al.  Characterizing aquatic sediment-oil aggregates using in situ instruments. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[35]  M. Kawachi,et al.  Effects of carbon source on growth and morphology of Botryococcus braunii , 2011, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[36]  Allen R. Hanson,et al.  Automatic In Situ Identification of Plankton , 2005, 2005 Seventh IEEE Workshops on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV/MOTION'05) - Volume 1.

[37]  B. Eyre,et al.  Reduced performance of native infauna following recruitment to a habitat-forming invasive marine alga , 2008, Oecologia.

[38]  M. James Sampling and preservation methods for the quantitative enumeration of microzooplankton , 1991 .

[39]  E. Buskey,et al.  Use of the FlowCAM for semi-automated recognition and enumeration of red tide cells (Karenia brevis) in natural plankton samples , 2006 .

[40]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Distribution, growth and survival of anchovy larvae (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) in relation to hydrodynamic and trophic environment in the Bay of Biscay , 2008 .

[41]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Co-limitation of diatoms by iron and silicic acid in the equatorial Pacific , 2011 .

[42]  H. Saito,et al.  A rapid analysis of copepod feeding using FlowCAM , 2007 .