Prevalence of selective inhibition of HPV‐16 DNA amplification in cervicovaginal lavages

HPV‐16 viral load has been assessed with real‐time PCR assays by measuring HPV‐16 DNA and a human gene in genital samples. HPV‐16 viral load measurements are thus based on the inference that inhibitors contained in samples will equally impede amplification of DNA sequences from HPV‐16 and human DNA. We have previously shown that sample lysates can inhibit amplification of HPV‐16 but not β‐globin DNA. In the current study, cervicovaginal lavages lysates considered adequate for PCR analysis by a qualitative β‐globin PCR test, were screened for the presence of inhibitors using internal controls (IC) for HPV‐16 DNA and β‐globin in real‐time PCR assays. Of 150 lysates screened with both ICs, 12 (8%) contained inhibitors. Inhibition of amplification of both ICs was demonstrated in four of these specimens. In eight lysates, amplification of HPV‐16 IC only was impeded. Six (50%) of these 12 lysates tested positive for HPV‐16 DNA despite the presence of PCR inhibitors. The HPV‐16 viral load increased significantly after dilution of 11 of 12 lysates, demonstrating the presence of inhibitors in the undiluted lysate. Nine (90%) of 10 samples with inhibitors that were tested after dilution did not demonstrate inhibitory activity. The use of internal controls in real‐time PCR is clearly essential to determine HPV viral loads since the effect of inhibitors on primer‐driven genomic amplification is variable. J. Med. Virol. 72:132–137, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  H. Verbrugh,et al.  Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  A. Hongo,et al.  Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Physical Status of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 DNA by Quantitative Real-Time PCR , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  F. Coutlée,et al.  Comparison between vaginal tampon and cervicovaginal lavage specimen collection for detection of human papillomavirus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction , 1997, Journal of medical virology.

[4]  C. Clavel,et al.  Hybrid capture II, a new sensitive test for human papillomavirus detection. Comparison with hybrid capture I and PCR results in cervical lesions. , 1998, Journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  W. Reeves,et al.  Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Copy Number Is Dependent on Grade of Cervical Disease and HPV Type , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  C J L M Meijer,et al.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  J. Sellors,et al.  Urine Specimens from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women Inhibitory to Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acid by PCR, Ligase Chain Reaction, and Transcription-Mediated Amplification: Identification of Urinary Substances Associated with Inhibition and Removal of Inhibitory Activity , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  M. Sherman,et al.  Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  H. Adami,et al.  Viral load of human papilloma virus 16 as a determinant for development of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study , 2000, The Lancet.

[10]  E. Franco,et al.  Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  F. Coutlée,et al.  Detection of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 DNA in Consecutive Genital Samples Does Not Always Represent Persistent Infection as Determined by Molecular Variant Analysis , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  U. Gyllensten,et al.  Host genetic control of HPV 16 titer in carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[13]  D. Provencher,et al.  The future of HPV testing in clinical laboratories and applied virology research. , 1997, Clinical and diagnostic virology.

[14]  K. Ramotar,et al.  Inhibition of PCR in Genital and Urine Specimens Submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis Testing , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  S. Syrjänen,et al.  Integrated Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Is Frequently Found in Cervical Cancer Precursors as Demonstrated by a Novel Quantitative Real-Time PCR Technique , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  Improved detection of viral RNA isolated from liquid-based cytology samples. , 2001 .

[17]  T. Wright,et al.  Evaluation of the Hybrid Capture human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid detection test. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  F. Berrada,et al.  Discordance between primer pairs in the polymerase chain reaction for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: a role for taq polymerase inhibitors. , 1991, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[19]  F. Coutlée,et al.  Real-time PCR assays using internal controls for quantitation of HPV-16 and beta-globin DNA in cervicovaginal lavages. , 2003, Journal of virological methods.

[20]  C. Clavel,et al.  Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by hybrid capture assay and routine cytologic screening to detect high‐grade cervical lesions , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[21]  F. Coutlée,et al.  An Important Proportion of Genital Samples Submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis Detection by PCR Contain Small Amounts of Cellular DNA as Measured by β-Globin Gene Amplification , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[22]  H. Adami,et al.  Consistent high viral load of human papillomavirus 16 and risk of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study , 2000, The Lancet.

[23]  I. Nindl,et al.  Human papillomavirus detection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the second-generation hybrid capture microplate test, comparing two different cervical specimen collection methods. , 1998, Clinical and diagnostic virology.

[24]  David R. Scott,et al.  Persistence of type-specific human papillomavirus infection among cytologically normal women. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[25]  J. Icenogle,et al.  A sensitive, type-specific, fluorogenic probe assay for detection of human papillomavirus DNA , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[26]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Type-specific human papillomavirus DNA in abnormal smears as a predictor of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  K. Livak,et al.  Detection and Quantitation of Human Papillomavirus by Using the Fluorescent 5′ Exonuclease Assay , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[28]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.