Phase II Monitoring of Autocorrelated Polynomial Pro les in AR(1) Processes

In many practical situations, the quality of a process or product can be characterized by a function or pro le. Here, we consider a polynomial pro le and investigate the e ect of the violation of a common independence assumption, implicitly considered in most control charting applications, on the performance of the existing monitoring techniques. We speci cally consider a case when there is autocorrelation between pro les over time. An autoregressive model of order one is used to model the autocorrelation structure between error terms in successive pro les. In addition, two remedial methods, based on time series approaches, are presented for monitoring autocorrelated polynomial pro les in phase II. Their performances are compared using a numerical simulation runs in terms of an Average Run Length (ARL) criterion. The e ects of assignable cause and autocorrelation coe cient on the shape of pro les are also investigated.

[1]  S. P. Wright,et al.  Comparing Curves Using Additive Models , 2002 .

[2]  Jamal Arkat,et al.  A generalized linear statistical model approach to monitor profiles , 2007 .

[3]  Willis A. Jensen,et al.  Profile Monitoring via Nonlinear Mixed Models , 2009 .

[4]  Rassoul Noorossana,et al.  On the Monitoring of Autocorrelated Linear Profiles , 2008 .

[5]  Fugee Tsung,et al.  Monitoring General Linear Profiles Using Multivariate Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Schemes , 2007, Technometrics.

[6]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Current research on profile monitoring , 2007 .

[7]  Changliang Zou,et al.  A control chart based on a change-point model for monitoring linear profiles , 2006 .

[8]  Miloslav Suchánek,et al.  Multivariate control charts: Control charts for calibration curves , 1994 .

[9]  Jionghua Jin,et al.  Feature-Preserving Data Compression of Stamping Tonnage Information Using Wavelets , 1999, Technometrics.

[10]  Lan Kang,et al.  On-Line Monitoring When the Process Yields a Linear Profile , 2000 .

[11]  Willis A. Jensen,et al.  Monitoring Correlation Within Linear Profiles Using Mixed Models , 2008 .

[12]  Mahmoud A. Mahmoud,et al.  On the Monitoring of Linear Profiles , 2003 .

[13]  Yu Ding,et al.  Phase I Analysis for Monitoring Nonlinear Profiles in Manufacturing Processes , 2006 .

[14]  Rassoul Noorossana,et al.  Phase I Monitoring of Polynomial Profiles , 2008 .

[15]  F. S. Stover,et al.  Statistical quality control applied to ion chromatography calibrations , 1998 .

[16]  Fugee Tsung,et al.  Using Profile Monitoring Techniques for a Data‐rich Environment with Huge Sample Size , 2005 .

[17]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Performance evaluation of two methods for online monitoring of linear calibration profiles , 2006 .

[18]  Mahmoud A. Mahmoud,et al.  A change point method for linear profile data , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[19]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Statistical monitoring of nonlinear product and process quality profiles , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[20]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Using Control Charts to Monitor Process and Product Quality Profiles , 2004 .

[21]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Phase I Analysis of Linear Profiles With Calibration Applications , 2004, Technometrics.