Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest

Summary Airborne laser scanning data and corresponding field data were acquired from boreal forests in Norway and Sweden, coniferous and broadleaved forests in Germany and tropical pulpwood plantations in Brazil. Treetop positions were extracted using six different algorithms developed in Finland, Germany, Norway and Sweden, and the accuracy of tree detection and height estimation was assessed. Furthermore, the weaknesses and strengths of the methods under different types of forest were analyzed. The results showed that forest structure strongly affected the performance of all algorithms. Particularly, the success of tree detection was found to be dependent on tree density and clustering. The differences in performance between methods were more pronounced for tree detection than for height estimation. The algorithms showed a slightly better performance in the conditions for which they were developed, while some could be adapted by different parameterization according to training with local data. The results of this study may help guiding the choice of method under different forest types and may be of great value for future refinement of the single-tree detection algorithms.

[1]  Gregory S. Biging,et al.  Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models , 1995 .

[2]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .

[3]  Barbara Koch,et al.  Prior-knowledge-based single-tree extraction , 2011 .

[4]  T. Tokola,et al.  Functions for estimating stem diameter and tree age using tree height, crown width and existing stand database information , 2005 .

[5]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation , 2002 .

[6]  Matthias Dobbertin,et al.  A Comparison of Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Height and Basal Area Growth of Individual Conifer Trees , 1992, Forest Science.

[7]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner , 2004 .

[8]  Tomas Brandtberg.  Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[9]  Barbara Koch,et al.  TREE SPECIES DETECTION USING FULL WAVEFORM LIDAR DATA IN A COMPLEX FOREST , 2010 .

[10]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[11]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR - effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type , 2010 .

[12]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Using numerical optimization for specifying individual-tree competition models. , 2000 .

[13]  Manfred Näslund,et al.  Skogsförsöksanstaltens gallringsförsök i tallskog , 1936 .

[14]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data , 2005 .

[15]  E. Næsset,et al.  Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data , 2010 .

[16]  E. Næsset,et al.  Single Tree Segmentation Using Airborne Laser Scanner Data in a Structurally Heterogeneous Spruce Forest , 2006 .

[17]  Paul E. Gessler,et al.  The influence of conifer forest canopy cover on the accuracy of two individual tree measurement algorithms using lidar data , 2008 .

[18]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics , 2010 .

[19]  J. Reitberger,et al.  3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data , 2009 .

[20]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[21]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Single tree detection in heterogeneous boreal forests using airborne laser scanning and area-based stem number estimates , 2012 .

[22]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[23]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[24]  E. Næsset.  Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[25]  Robert J. Woodham,et al.  The automatic recognition of individual trees in aerial images of forests based on a synthetic tree crown image model , 1996 .

[26]  B. Koch,et al.  Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar data , 2006 .

[27]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2003 .

[28]  Mikko Inkinen,et al.  A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  A method for linking field-surveyed and aerial-detected single trees using cross correlation of position images and the optimization of weighted tree list graphs. , 2008 .

[30]  A. W. Greely,et al.  The Home of the Blizzard, being the Story of the Australian Antarctic Expedition, 1911-1914 , 1915 .

[31]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  Development of a pit filling algorithm for LiDAR canopy height models , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[32]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .