Selective Recovery of Copper from Acid Leaching Solution through Slow Release Sulfide Precipitant

A new kind of sulfide precipitant, namely, slow release sulfide precipitant (SRSP), was developed and prepared first to realize the selective recovery of copper from an acid leaching solution. The experimental results indicated that SRSP as a precipitant could selectively and efficiently recover copper and the high purity of copper sulfide slag with a Cu grade of 48.16%, and a Cu recovery rate of 97.84% could be obtained. Moreover, copper in leaching solution could be recovered more efficiently and selectively by SRSP compared with Na2S. The results of H2S gas release, chemical reaction energy calculation, and SEM image analyses illustrated that realizing the selective recovery of copper mainly depended on the ions of S2− and HS− produced by the dissolution of SRSP. Moreover, the concentrations of S2− and HS− should always be kept at a low level in the process of selective recovery of copper; this is the biggest difference from the traditional precipitant and the key to preventing the escape of H2S gas in the copper recovery process. More pivotally, SRSP provides an alternative sulfide precipitant for the selective recovery of copper from the acid leaching solution of copper smelting dust.

[1]  Chengya Wang,et al.  A shortcut approach for cooperative disposal of flue dust and waste acid from copper smelting: Decontamination of arsenic-bearing waste and recovery of metals. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Song-song Wang,et al.  Copper and arsenic substance flow analysis of pyrometallurgical process for copper production , 2022, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China.

[3]  Xianping Luo,et al.  Coordination mechanism of aluminum with oxalate and fluoride in aluminum crystallization from vanadium extraction wastewater , 2021, Journal of Molecular Liquids.

[4]  Bingjie Jin,et al.  Separation of arsenic and extraction of zinc and copper from high-arsenic copper smelting dusts by alkali leaching followed by sulfuric acid leaching , 2021 .

[5]  Lihua Liu,et al.  Comprehensive recovery of arsenic and antimony from arsenic-rich copper smelter dust. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  Chengya Wang,et al.  Efficient removal and recovery of arsenic from copper smelting flue dust by a roasting method: Process optimization, phase transformation and mechanism investigation. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Chengya Wang,et al.  Co-treatment of copper smelting flue dust and arsenic sulfide residue by a pyrometallurgical approach for simultaneous removal and recovery of arsenic. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Tian C. Zhang,et al.  Mechanochemical activation on selective leaching of arsenic from copper smelting flue dusts. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  S. Bakhtiari,et al.  The efficiency of activated carbon/magnetite nanoparticles composites in copper removal: Industrial waste recovery, green synthesis, characterization, and adsorption-desorption studies , 2021, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials.

[10]  L. Rangan,et al.  Occurrence, geochemical fraction, ecological and health risk assessment of cadmium, copper and nickel in soils contaminated with municipal solid wastes. , 2021, Chemosphere.

[11]  Hua Wang,et al.  Efficient removal of arsenic from copper smelting wastewater in form of scorodite using copper slag , 2020 .

[12]  Yuanbo Zhang,et al.  Recycling the domestic copper scrap to address the China’s copper sustainability , 2020 .

[13]  Xiangfeng Kong,et al.  Research and industrial application of a vacuum separation technique for recovering valuable metals from copper dross , 2020 .

[14]  Yue-hua Hu,et al.  Selective sulfide precipitation of copper ions from arsenic wastewater using monoclinic pyrrhotite. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Yue-hua Hu,et al.  Arsenic(V) adsorption on ferric oxyhydroxide gel at high alkalinity for securely recycling of arsenic-bearing copper slag , 2019, Applied Surface Science.

[16]  Muhammad Kamran Khalid,et al.  Sulfuric acid leaching for capturing value from copper rich converter slag , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[17]  Gavin M. Mudd,et al.  Growing Global Copper Resources, Reserves and Production: Discovery Is Not the Only Control on Supply , 2018, Economic Geology.

[18]  A. Culka,et al.  Characterization and pH-dependent environmental stability of arsenic trioxide-containing copper smelter flue dust. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  J. Jia,et al.  Evaluation of magnetic chitosan beads for adsorption of heavy metal ions. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Y. Liu,et al.  Facile design of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic copper mesh assisted by candle soot for oil water separation , 2018 .

[21]  Tieyong Zuo,et al.  Patterns and challenges in the copper industry in China , 2017 .

[22]  P. Nidheesh,et al.  Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation process: Recent trends and removal mechanism. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[23]  Seiji Hashimoto,et al.  Assessment of the Secondary Copper Reserves of Nations. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  L. Chai,et al.  Cascade sulfidation and separation of copper and arsenic from acidic wastewater via gas-liquid reaction , 2016 .

[25]  Seung-Do Yu,et al.  Environmental Source of Arsenic Exposure , 2014, Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi.

[26]  Gavin M. Mudd,et al.  Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining , 2014 .

[27]  A. Ahmad,et al.  A study on acid reclamation and copper recovery using low pressure nanofiltration membrane , 2010 .

[28]  M. Laatikainen,et al.  Removal of copper and nickel from concentrated ZnSO4 solutions with silica-supported chelating adsorbents , 2008 .

[29]  A. Veeken,et al.  Selective Precipitation of Heavy Metals as Controlled by a Sulfide-Selective Electrode , 2003 .