An investigation of synchrony in transport networks

The cumulative degree distributions of transport networks, such as air transportation networks and respiratory neuronal networks, follow power laws. The significance of power laws with respect to other network performance measures, such as throughput and synchronization, remains an open question. Evolving methods for the analysis and design of air transportation networks must be able to address network performance in the face of increasing demands and the need to contain and control local network disturbances, such as congestion. Toward this end, we investigate functional relationships that govern the performance of transport networks; for example, the links between the first nontrivial eigenvalue, λ2, of a network’s Laplacian matrix—a quantitative measure of network synchronizability—and other global network parameters. In particular, among networks with a fixed degree distribution and fixed network assortativity (a measure of a network’s preference to attach nodes based on a similarity or difference), those with small λ2 are shown to be poor synchronizers, to have much longer shortest paths and to have greater clustering in comparison to those with large λ2. A simulation of a respiratory network adds data to our investigation. This study is a beginning step in developing metrics and design variables for the analysis and active design of air transport networks. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity 00: 000–000, 2008

[1]  Walter Willinger,et al.  A first-principles approach to understanding the internet's router-level topology , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.

[2]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[4]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[5]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[6]  C. Wu Perturbation of coupling matrices and its effect on the synchronizability in arrays of coupled chaotic systems , 2003, nlin/0307052.

[7]  J. Feldman,et al.  Sodium and Calcium Current-Mediated Pacemaker Neurons and Respiratory Rhythm Generation , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Jürgen Jost,et al.  Synchronization of networks with prescribed degree distributions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[9]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Towards a Theory of Scale-Free Graphs: Definition, Properties, and Implications , 2005, Internet Math..

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[12]  Dorothea Wagner,et al.  Approximating Clustering Coefficient and Transitivity , 2005, J. Graph Algorithms Appl..

[13]  Michael Holroyd,et al.  Synchronizability and Connectivity of Discrete Complex Systems , 2006 .

[14]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Structure and Efficiency of the World-Wide Airport Network , 2003 .

[15]  Jürgen Jost,et al.  Delays, connection topology, and synchronization of coupled chaotic maps. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[16]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[17]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in small-world networks. , 2008, Chaos.

[18]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Modeling the world-wide airport network , 2004 .

[19]  M. Fiedler Algebraic connectivity of graphs , 1973 .

[20]  A. Crofts,et al.  Structure and function of the -complex of , 1992 .