An Approach for Robust Design of Reactive Power Metal Mixtures Based on Non-deterministic Micro-scale Shock Simulation

In this paper, we propose a method for the robust design of materials involving processes that are computationally intensive and selectively random. The material system considered is a reactive particle metal mixture (RPMM) composed of aluminum and iron oxide (Al+Fe2O3). Shock simulations of discrete energetic particle mixtures are performed to predict the system’s mechanical and thermal behavior that will be used by a designer of the mixture to achieve robust micro-scale reaction initiation. The method used to predict the behavior of the material system is the robust concept exploration method with error margin index (RCEM-EMI). An error margin index is a mathematical construct indicating the location of mean system performance and the spread of this performance considering both variability in design variables and models of the system. Variability in responses of a model may be due to system variation that cannot be easily parameterized in terms of noise factors. Furthermore, lack of data, due to the cost of simulations and experiments, leads to uncertain parameters in empirical models. System response variability and parameter uncertainty in an empirical model are estimated in a computationally efficient manner to formulate the error margin indices, which are then leveraged to search for ranged sets of design specifications. Finally, the RCEM-EMI is illustrated for designing a RPMM.

[1]  A. Harvey Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity , 1976 .

[2]  A. Merzhanov,et al.  On critical conditions for thermal explosion of a hot spot , 1966 .

[3]  M. Aitkin Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using GLIM , 1987 .

[4]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[5]  Takeshi Amemiya,et al.  A note on a heteroscedastic model , 1977 .

[6]  S. Isukapalli,et al.  Stochastic Response Surface Methods (SRSMs) for Uncertainty Propagation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  David J. Benson,et al.  Eulerian finite-element simulations of experimentally acquired HMX microstructures , 1999 .

[8]  Wayne A. Fuller,et al.  Least Squares Estimation When the Covariance Matrix and Parameter Vector are Functionally Related , 1980 .

[9]  Scott Kirkpatrick,et al.  Optimization by simulated annealing: Quantitative studies , 1984 .

[10]  David J. Benson,et al.  An analysis by direct numerical simulation of the effects of particle morphology on the shock compaction of copper powder , 1994 .

[11]  M. Boyce,et al.  A constitutive model for the nonlinear viscoelastic viscoplastic behavior of glassy polymers , 1995 .

[12]  Manohar P. Kamat Structural optimization : status and promise , 1993 .

[13]  D. Benson Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes , 1992 .

[14]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[15]  David J. Benson,et al.  THE CALCULATION OF THE SHOCK VELOCITY: PARTICLE VELOCITY RELATIONSHIP FOR A COPPER POWDER BY DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION , 1995 .

[16]  D. V. Widder,et al.  Note on Tschebycheff Approximation , 1927 .

[17]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Computer Experiments for Quality Control by Parameter Design , 1990 .

[18]  Carl D. Sorensen,et al.  A general approach for robust optimal design , 1993 .

[19]  G. Geoffrey Vining,et al.  Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach , 1990 .

[20]  J. Grego Generalized Linear Models and Process Variation , 1993 .

[21]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream , 1992 .

[22]  J. Engel,et al.  A generalized linear modeling approach to robust design , 1996 .

[23]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Random Heterogeneous Media: Microstructure and Improved Bounds on Effective Properties , 1991 .

[24]  R. Carroll,et al.  Variance Function Estimation , 1987 .

[25]  H. Theil Principles of econometrics , 1971 .

[26]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  SATISFYING RANGED SETS OF DESIGN REQUIREMENTS USING DESIGN CAPABILITY INDICES AS METRICS , 1999 .

[27]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Dispersion Effects From Fractional Designs , 1986 .

[28]  Roger J. Brooks,et al.  Choosing the best model: Level of detail, complexity, and model performance , 1996 .

[29]  Francis D. Murnaghan,et al.  Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid , 1967 .

[30]  Donald R. Houser,et al.  A ROBUST OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE WITH VARIATIONS ON DESIGN VARIABLES AND CONSTRAINTS , 1995 .

[31]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[32]  Gail Gong,et al.  Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Theory and Applications , 1981 .

[33]  D. Benson A multi-material Eulerian formulation for the efficient solution of impact and penetration problems , 1995 .

[34]  Neil R. Ullman,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations , 1988 .

[35]  Kwok-Leung Tsui,et al.  Economical experimentation methods for robust design , 1991 .

[36]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  Types of Uncertainty in Design Decision Making , 2004 .

[37]  H. Glejser A New Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1969 .

[38]  D. Pregibon,et al.  Analyzing dispersion effects from replicated factorial experiments , 1988 .

[39]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.