Assessment of air quality in Haora River basin using fuzzy multiple-attribute decision making techniques

This paper deals with assessment of air quality in Haora River basin using two techniques. Initially, air quality indices were evaluated using a modified EPA method. The indices were also evaluated using a fuzzy comprehensive assessment (FCA) method. The results obtained from the fuzzy comprehensive assessment method were compared to that obtained from the modified EPA method. To illustrate the applicability of the methodology proposed herein, a case study has been presented. Air samples have been collected at 10 sampling sites located along Haora River. Six important air pollutants, namely, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, suspended particulate matter (SPM), PM10, and lead, were monitored continuously, and air quality maps were generated on the GIS platform. Comparison of the methodologies has clearly highlighted superiority and robustness of the fuzzy comprehensive assessment method in determining air quality indices under study. It has effectively addressed the inherent uncertainties involved in the evaluation, modeling, and interpretation of sampling data, which was beyond the scope of the traditional weighted approaches employed otherwise. The FCA method is robust and prepares a credible platform of air quality evaluation and identification, in face of the uncertainties that remain eclipsed in the traditional approaches like the modified EPA method. The insights gained through the present study are believed to be of pivotal significance in guiding the development and implementation of effective environmental remedial action plans in the study area.

[1]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  Water quality assessment of a river basin under fuzzy multi-criteria framework , 2015 .

[2]  Tai-Yi Yu,et al.  Selection of the scenarios of ozone pollution at southern Taiwan area utilizing principal component analysis , 2000 .

[3]  S. M. Shiva Nagendra,et al.  Assessment of air quality near traffic intersections in Bangalore city using air quality indices , 2007 .

[4]  Daniel S Cohan,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Multipollutant Air Quality Management and Its Application in Georgia , 2007, Environmental management.

[5]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  OPTIMAL ALLOCATION OF LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE: A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH , 2008 .

[6]  Paolo Zannetti,et al.  An Introduction to Air Pollution - Definitions, Classifications, and History , 2007 .

[7]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts of Integrated Industrial Estate—Pantnagar through application of air and water quality indices , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[8]  Sef van den Elshout,et al.  CAQI Common Air Quality Index--update with PM(2.5) and sensitivity analysis. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna: An interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach , 2007 .

[10]  Zhou Shi,et al.  Assessment and mapping of environmental quality in agricultural soils of Zhejiang Province, China , 2007 .

[11]  H. Inhaber A set of suggested air quality indices for Canada. , 1975, Atmospheric environment.

[12]  Aditya Tyagi,et al.  Formation of an Air Pollution Index. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  Helmut Mayer,et al.  Two impact related air quality indices as tools to assess the daily and long-term air pollution , 2009 .

[14]  Mukesh Sharma,et al.  Interpretation of air quality data using an air quality index for the city of Kanpur, India , 2003 .

[15]  V. Sharma Development of air quality indices for Mumbai, India , 1999 .

[16]  James Longhurst 1 To 100: Creating an Air Quality Index in Pittsburgh , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[17]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  A Scenario Based Impact Assessment of Trace Metals on Ecosystem of River Ganges Using Multivariate Analysis Coupled with Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach , 2017, Water Resources Management.