A Comparison of Conjoint Analysis Response Formats
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kevin J. Boyle | Mario F. Teisl | Thomas P. Holmes | Brian E. Roe | B. Roe | M. Teisl | K. Boyle | T. Holmes
[1] Edward G. Carmines,et al. Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .
[2] M. Rokeach. The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .
[3] Shlomo Kalish,et al. A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis , 1991 .
[4] Stephen K. Swallow,et al. Asymmetries in Ordered Strength of Preference Models: Implications of Focus Shift for Discrete-Choice Preference Estimation , 1999 .
[5] P. A. Russell,et al. Ranking or rating? Some data and their implications for the measurement of evaluative response , 1994 .
[6] Jerry A. Hausman,et al. Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .
[7] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. An Empirical Comparison of Ratings-Based and Choice-Based Conjoint Models , 1992 .
[8] Guy Garrod,et al. The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study , 1997 .
[9] John Mackenzie,et al. A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models , 1993 .
[10] William H. Desvousges,et al. Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs , 1997 .
[11] Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al. Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data , 1991 .
[12] W. Michael Hanemann,et al. Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .
[13] Jon A. Krosnick,et al. The Measurement of Values in Surveys: A Comparison of Ratings and Rankings , 1985 .
[14] N. Feather,et al. The measurement of values: Effects of different assessment procedures , 1973 .
[15] J. Louviere,et al. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .
[16] Kevin J. Boyle,et al. Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation , 1996 .
[17] C. Barrett,et al. Conjoint Analysis of Groundwater Protection Programs , 1997, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
[18] Paul S. Edelman,et al. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 , 1990, Pace Environmental Law Review.
[19] Gregory L. Poe,et al. Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach , 1998 .
[20] Jon A. Krosnick,et al. A TEST OF THE FORM-RESISTANT CORRELATION HYPOTHESIS RATINGS, RANKINGS, AND THE MEASUREMENT OF VALUES , 1988 .
[21] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .
[22] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Cross-task validity comparisons of stated preference choice models , 1993 .
[23] T. F. Weaver,et al. Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms , 1993 .
[24] L. Mattsson,et al. How do Different Forest Management Practices Affect the Non-timber Value of Forests?—an Economic Analysis , 1994 .
[25] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation , 1997 .
[26] Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .
[27] Thomas P. Holmes,et al. The effect of response time on conjoint analysis estimates of rainforest protection values. , 1998 .
[28] N. Hanley,et al. THE CONTINGENT VALUATION OF FOREST CHARACTERISTICS: TWO EXPERIMENTS , 1993 .
[29] I. Krinsky,et al. On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .