Application of perceptual difference model on regularization techniques of parallel MR imaging.

Parallel magnetic resonance imaging through sensitivity encoding using multiple receiver coils has emerged as an effective tool to reduce imaging time or to improve image SNR. The quality of reconstructed images is limited by the inaccurate estimation of the sensitivity map, noise in the acquired k-space data and the ill-conditioned nature of the coefficient matrix. Tikhonov regularization is a popular method to reduce or eliminate the ill-conditioned nature of the problem. In this approach, selection of the regularization map and the regularization parameter is very important. Perceptual difference model (PDM) is a quantitative image quality evaluation tool that has been successfully applied to varieties of MR applications. High correlation between the human rating and PDM score shows that PDM should be suitable to evaluate image quality in parallel MR imaging. By applying PDM, we compared four methods of selecting the regularization map and four methods of selecting the regularization parameter. We found that a regularization map obtained using generalized series (GS) together with a spatially adaptive regularization parameter gave the best reconstructions. PDM was also used as an objective function for optimizing two important parameters in the spatially adaptive method. We conclude that PDM enables one to do comprehensive experiments and that it is an effective tool for designing and optimizing reconstruction methods in parallel MR imaging.

[1]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Peter M. Jakob,et al.  AUTO-SMASH: A self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging , 1998, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[3]  A. Macovski Noise in MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  K. Kwong,et al.  Parallel imaging reconstruction using automatic regularization , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images , 1987 .

[6]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Donglai Huo,et al.  Perceptual difference paradigm for analyzing image quality of fast MRI techniques , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Digital images and human vision , 1993 .

[9]  L. Ying,et al.  On Tikhonov regularization for image reconstruction in parallel MRI , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[11]  Mark A. Griswold,et al.  AUTO-SMASH: A self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging , 1998 .

[12]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Fast MRI data acquisition using multiple detectors , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Image dissimilarity , 1998, Signal Process..

[15]  Seymour H Levitt,et al.  Nina Einhorn, MD. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  S. Einav,et al.  A decoupled coil detector array for fast image acquisition in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Medical physics.

[17]  Richard A. Normann,et al.  Photoreceptor contributions to contrast sensitivity: Applications in radiological diagnosis , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  G. Wahba,et al.  When is the optimal regularization parameter insensitive to the choice of the loss function , 1990 .

[19]  J B Ra,et al.  Fast imaging using subencoding data sets from multiple detectors , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Jonathan S. Lewin,et al.  Validation of a human vision model for image quality evaluation of fast interventional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[21]  J. Duyn,et al.  Design of a SENSE‐optimized high‐sensitivity MRI receive coil for brain imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  Quantitative studies in retinex theory a comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the “color mondrian” experiments , 1976, Vision Research.

[23]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Specific coil design for SENSE: A six‐element cardiac array , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.