Research Article Artificial Neural Network-based System for Pet Volume Segmentation

Tumour detection, classification, and quantification in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging at early stage of disease are important issues for clinical diagnosis, assessment of response to treatment, and radiotherapy planning. Many techniques have been proposed for segmenting medical imaging data; however, some of the approaches have poor performance, large inaccuracy, and require substantial computation time for analysing large medical volumes. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches can provide improved accuracy and save decent amount of time. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), as one of the best AI techniques, have the capability to classify and quantify precisely lesions and model the clinical evaluation for a specific problem. This paper presents a novel application of ANNs in the wavelet domain for PET volume segmentation. ANN performance evaluation using different training algorithms in both spatial and wavelet domains with a different number of neurons in the hidden layer is also presented. The best number of neurons in the hidden layer is determined according to the experimental results, which is also stated Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation training algorithm as the best training approach for the proposed application. The proposed intelligent system results are compared with those obtained using conventional techniques including thresholding and clustering based approaches. Experimental and Monte Carlo simulated PET phantom data sets and clinical PET volumes of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients were utilised to validate the proposed algorithm which has demonstrated promising results.

[1]  P. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 2019 .

[2]  M. Burge,et al.  Digital Image Processing , 2016, Texts in Computer Science.

[3]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  D. Visvikis,et al.  OncoPET_DB: A Freely Distributed Database of Realistic Simulated Whole Body 18F-FDG PET Images for Oncology , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Saeid Iranmanesh,et al.  A differential adaptive learning rate method for back-propagation neural networks , 2009 .

[6]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of various strategies for 18F-FET PET-guided delineation of target volumes in high-grade glioma patients , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  S. Basu,et al.  Selecting the optimal image segmentation strategy in the era of multitracer multimodality imaging: a critical step for image-guided radiation therapy , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  Michalis Aristophanous,et al.  The development and testing of a digital PET phantom for the evaluation of tumor volume segmentation techniques. , 2008, Medical physics.

[9]  T G Turkington,et al.  Multisphere phantom and analysis algorithm for PET image quality assessment , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Abbes Amira,et al.  A segmentation concept for positron emission tomography imaging using multiresolution analysis , 2008, Neurocomputing.

[11]  R. Odh,et al.  A comparison of the imaging properties of a 3- and 4-ring biograph PET scanner using a novel extended NEMA phantom , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  N. Mani,et al.  A Pilot Study of Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation from Positron Emission Tomography Images using Standard Uptake Values , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Image and Signal Processing.

[14]  Abbes Amira,et al.  Fully automated segmentation of oncological PET volumes using a combined multiscale and statistical model. , 2007, Medical physics.

[15]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Image-processing technique for suppressing ribs in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  H.P. Ng,et al.  Medical Image Segmentation Using K-Means Clustering and Improved Watershed Algorithm , 2006, 2006 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[17]  H. Troy Nagle,et al.  Performance of the Levenberg–Marquardt neural network training method in electronic nose applications , 2005 .

[18]  Lefteris Livieratos,et al.  A dual modality approach to quantitative quality control in emission tomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  An inter-laboratory comparison study of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Duan Li,et al.  On Restart Procedures for the Conjugate Gradient Method , 2004, Numerical Algorithms.

[21]  H. Herzog,et al.  NEMA NU2-2001 guided performance evaluation of four Siemens ECAT PET scanners , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Characterization of CT liver lesions based on texture features and a multiple neural network classification scheme , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[23]  Xiang-Gen Xia,et al.  Wavelet-Based Texture Analysis and Synthesis Using Hidden Markov Models , 2003 .

[24]  Xinghuo Yu,et al.  A backpropagation learning framework for feedforward neural networks , 2001, ISCAS 2001. The 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.01CH37196).

[25]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Improving the Convergence of the Backpropagation Algorithm Using Learning Rate Adaptation Methods , 1999, Neural Computation.

[26]  Edwin N. Cook,et al.  Automated segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance images of brain using artificial neural networks , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[28]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm , 1993, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

[29]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[30]  Roberto Battiti,et al.  First- and Second-Order Methods for Learning: Between Steepest Descent and Newton's Method , 1992, Neural Computation.

[31]  M. F. Møller A Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Fast Supervised Learning , 1990 .

[32]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  P.K Sahoo,et al.  A survey of thresholding techniques , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[34]  M. Arbib The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[35]  V. I. George Introduction To Non–linear Optimization , 2009 .

[36]  Mark Muzi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Oncologic Imaging , 2006 .

[37]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  Neural networks - methodology and applications , 2005 .

[38]  Yaguang Chen,et al.  Multiresolution Medical Image Segmentation Based on Wavelet Transform , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[39]  Kashif Rajpoot,et al.  Hyperspectral colon tissue cell classification , 2004 .

[40]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[41]  Eugenius Kaszkurewicz,et al.  Steepest descent with momentum for quadratic functions is a version of the conjugate gradient method , 2004, Neural Networks.

[42]  Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro,et al.  Image Segmentation and Compression using Neural Networks , 2000 .

[43]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[44]  N. Otsu A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms , 1979, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..