Solving Semantic Interoperability Conflicts in Cross-Border E-Government Services

Interoperability is one of the most challenging problems in modern cross-organizational information systems, which rely on heterogeneous information and process models. Interoperability becomes very important for e-Government information systems that support cross-organizational communication especially in a cross-border setting. The main goal in this context is to seamlessly provide integrated services to the user (citizen). In this paper we focus on Pan European e-Services and issues related with their integration. Our analysis uses basic concepts of the generic public service model of the Governance Enterprise Architecture (GEA) and of the Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO), to express the semantic description of the e-services. Based on the above, we present a mediation infrastructure capable of resolving semantic interoperability conflicts at a pan-European level. We provide several examples to illustrate both the need to solve such semantic conflicts and the actual solutions we propose.

[1]  Bernhard Haslhofer,et al.  Files are Siles: Extending File Systems with Semantic Annotations , 2010, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[2]  San Murugesan,et al.  Handbook of Research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: Technologies, Business, and Social Applications , 2009 .

[3]  Yuzhong Qu,et al.  Searching Linked Objects with Falcons: Approach, Implementation and Evaluation , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[4]  Vladimir Kulyukin,et al.  CRISS: A Collaborative Route Information Sharing System for Visually Impaired Travelers , 2009 .

[5]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  The GEA: Governance Enterprise Architecture-Framework and Models , 2009 .

[6]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  A conceptual analysis of semantic conflicts in pan-European e-government services , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Mediatability: Estimating the Degree of Human Involvement in XML Schema Mediation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[8]  Mick Kerrigan,et al.  Applying Reasoning to Instance Transformation , 2008, WoMO.

[9]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Quickmig: automatic schema matching for data migration projects , 2007, CIKM '07.

[10]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  Public Administration Domain Ontology for a Semantic Web Services EGovernment Framework , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007).

[11]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  The Web Service Modeling Toolkit - An Integrated Development Environment for Semantic Web Services , 2007, ESWC.

[12]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Semantically-enabled service oriented architecture : concepts, technology and application , 2007, Service Oriented Computing and Applications.

[13]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Metadata for digital collections of e-government resources , 2007, Electron. Libr..

[14]  Adrian Mocan,et al.  An Ontology-Based Data Mediation Framework for Semantic Environments , 2007, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[15]  Xia Wang,et al.  WSMO-PA: Formal Specification of Public Administration Service Model on Semantic Web Service Ontology , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[16]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Semantic Web-Based Information Systems: State-of-the-Art Applications , 2006 .

[17]  Mick Kerrigan,et al.  Formal Model for Ontology Mapping Creation , 2006, SEMWEB.

[18]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  Infrastructure for the Semantic Pan-European E-Government Services , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Web Meets eGovernment.

[19]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Schema and ontology matching with COMA++ , 2005, SIGMOD '05.

[20]  Phokion G. Kolaitis.  Schema mappings, data exchange, and metadata management , 2005, PODS '05.

[21]  Olena Kaykova,et al.  Enabling Interoperability for Industrial Web Resources , 2005 .

[22]  Jos de Bruijn,et al.  WSML - a Language Framework for Semantic Web Services , 2005, Rule Languages for Interoperability.

[23]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Information systems interoperability: What lies beneath? , 2004, TOIS.

[24]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  An Overview of DC-Based e-Government Metadata Standards and Initiatives , 2004, EGOV.

[25]  Idabc.  European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services , 2004 .

[26]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Nuno Silva,et al.  Semantic Web complex ontology mapping , 2003, Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003).

[28]  Yannis Kalfoglou,et al.  Ontology mapping: the state of the art , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[29]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Translating Web Data , 2002, VLDB.

[30]  Maurizio Lenzerini,et al.  Data integration: a theoretical perspective , 2002, PODS.

[31]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  Answering queries using views: A survey , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[32]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[33]  Laura M. Haas,et al.  Data-driven understanding and refinement of schema mappings , 2001, SIGMOD '01.

[34]  Laura M. Haas,et al.  The Clio project: managing heterogeneity , 2001, SGMD.

[35]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  Information Brokering Across Heterogeneous Digital Data , 2000, Advances in Database Systems.

[36]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics , 1999, LPAR.

[37]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Information integration using logical views , 1997, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[38]  Serge Abiteboul,et al.  Correspondence and translation for heterogeneous data , 1997, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[39]  Michael Kifer,et al.  Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages , 1995, JACM.

[40]  C. Batini,et al.  A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration , 1986, CSUR.

[41]  A. Sheth.  International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems , 2022 .