Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation.

Many essential phenomena in biology involve changes in cell shape. Cell deformation occurs in response to physical forces either coming from the external environment or intracellularly generated. In most tests of cell rheology, an external constraint is usually superimposed on an already mechanically active cell, thus the measurements may reflect both active motion and passive viscoelastic deformation. To show that active and passive processes could be distinguished on a time scale basis, we designed a novel piezo-controlled micromanipulation system to impose dynamic mechanical deformations on individual cells. Chick fibroblasts were seized between two glass microplates; one of the plates, more flexible, served as a sensor of the applied force. Controlled amounts of unidirectional compression and traction in the range of 10(-8)-10(-7) N were applied, using either step functions or sinusoidal signals at chosen frequencies. These tests allowed identification of three time scale dependent regimes. (1) A dominant elastic response, characterized by a linear stress-strain relationship, was especially apparent at short times (seconds); (2) A viscous behavior, characterized by force relaxation and irreversible cell deformation, was noticeable at intermediate times (minutes). Data from traction and oscillatory excitation tests were well fitted by a three-element Kelvin viscoelastic model, allowing the calculation of two elastic moduli in the range of 600-1,000 N/m2 and an apparent viscosity of about 10(4) Pa.s. (3) A contractile regime, in which actin-dependent traction forces were developed in response to uniaxial load was apparent at longer times (several tens of minutes). These forces were in the order of 4 x 10(-8) N above viscous relaxation. Thus we could distinguish, on a time scale basis, the specific contributions of passive viscoelasticity and active traction, and evaluate their mechanical characteristics within one experiment on a single cell.

[1]  D. R. Coman Decreased Mutual Adhesiveness, a Property of Cells from Squamous Cell Carcinomas , 1944 .

[2]  Y. Hiramoto,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SEA URCHIN EGGS. I. SURFACE FORCE AND ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE CELL MEMBRANE. , 1963, Experimental cell research.

[3]  Walter Birchmeier,et al.  Stress fiber sarcomeres of fibroblasts are contractile , 1980, Cell.

[4]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[5]  C. Erickson,et al.  The deformability of BHK cells and polyoma virus-transformed BHK cells in relation to locomotory behaviour. , 1980, Journal of cell science.

[6]  M. Hubbe Adhesion and detachment of biological cellsin vitro , 1981 .

[7]  N O Petersen,et al.  Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P A Valberg,et al.  Cytoplasmic motions, rheology, and structure probed by a novel magnetic particle method , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  J. Kolega,et al.  Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  P A Valberg,et al.  Magnetic particle motions within living cells. Measurement of cytoplasmic viscosity and motile activity. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[11]  R M Nerem,et al.  An application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of the mechanical properties of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Jürgen Bereiter-Hahn,et al.  Mechanical Principles of Architecture of Eukaryotic Cells , 1987 .

[13]  G. Albrecht-Buehler,et al.  Role of cortical tension in fibroblast shape and movement. , 1987, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[14]  E. Elson,et al.  Cellular mechanics as an indicator of cytoskeletal structure and function. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[15]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[16]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  The cytomechanics of axonal elongation and retraction , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  D. McClay,et al.  Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  G. N. Antonova,et al.  Mechano-chemical control of human endothelium orientation and size , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  R M Nerem,et al.  Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  R. Wysolmerski,et al.  Involvement of myosin light-chain kinase in endothelial cell retraction. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  G. Truskey,et al.  The effect of fluid shear stress upon cell adhesion to fibronectin-treated surfaces. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  J. Bereiter-Hahn,et al.  Spreading of trypsinized cells: cytoskeletal dynamics and energy requirements. , 1990, Journal of cell science.

[23]  E. Elson,et al.  Mechanics of fibroblast locomotion: quantitative analysis of forces and motions at the leading lamellas of fibroblasts , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  A. Harris Protrusive Activity of the Cell Surface and the Movements of Tissue Cells , 1990 .

[25]  P. A. Watson,et al.  Function follows form: generation of intracellular signals by cell deformation , 1991, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[26]  P. Janmey,et al.  Mechanical properties of cytoskeletal polymers. , 1991, Current opinion in cell biology.

[27]  D. Taylor,et al.  The role of solation-contraction coupling in regulating stress fiber dynamics in nonmuscle cells , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  E. Elson,et al.  Preferential attachment of membrane glycoproteins to the cytoskeleton at the leading edge of lamella , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  R. Skalak,et al.  Cytoplasmic rheology of passive neutrophils. , 1991, Biorheology.

[30]  A. Eisen,et al.  Integrin α2β1 (VLA-2) mediates reorganization and contraction of collagen matrices by human cells , 1991, Cell.

[31]  D Needham,et al.  Time-dependent recovery of passive neutrophils after large deformation. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[32]  J. Condeelis Are all pseudopods created equal? , 1992, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[34]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  The riddle of morphogenesis: A question of solution chemistry or molecular cell engineering? , 1993, Cell.

[35]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Investigation of microtubule assembly and organization accompanying tension-induced neurite initiation. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[36]  A Leung,et al.  Synchrony of cell spreading and contraction force as phagocytes engulf large pathogens , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  J. Hoh,et al.  Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy , 1996 .

[38]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Human Neutrophils Under Mechanical Stress , 1994 .

[39]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[40]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  R. Nerem,et al.  Elongation of confluent endothelial cells in culture: the importance of fields of force in the associated alterations of their cytoskeletal structure. , 1995, Experimental cell research.

[42]  E. Elson,et al.  Contraction due to microtubule disruption is associated with increased phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  P. Macklem,et al.  Intracellular pressure is a motive force for cell motion in Amoeba proteus. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[44]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Influence of adhesion and cytoskeletal integrity on fibroblast traction. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[45]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Critical centrifugal forces induce adhesion rupture or structural reorganization in cultured cells. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[46]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Actin-Based Cell Motility and Cell Locomotion , 1996, Cell.

[47]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[48]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.