On the Role of Physical Interaction on Performance of Object Manipulation by Dyads

Human physical interactions can be intrapersonal, e.g., manipulating an object bimanually, or interpersonal, e.g., transporting an object with another person. In both cases, one or two agents are required to coordinate their limbs to attain the task goal. We investigated the physical coordination of two hands during an object-balancing task performed either bimanually by one agent or jointly by two agents. The task consisted of a series of static (holding) and dynamic (moving) phases, initiated by auditory cues. We found that task performance of dyads was not affected by different pairings of dominant and non-dominant hands. However, the spatial configuration of the two agents (side-by-side vs. face-to-face) appears to play an important role, such that dyads performed better side-by-side than face-to-face. Furthermore, we demonstrated that only individuals with worse solo performance can benefit from interpersonal coordination through physical couplings, whereas the better individuals do not. The present work extends ongoing investigations on human-human physical interactions by providing new insights about factors that influence dyadic performance. Our findings could potentially impact several areas, including robotic-assisted therapies, sensorimotor learning and human performance augmentation.

[1]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Leading the follower: An fMRI investigation of dynamic cooperativity and leader–follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Comparing the attractor strength of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination using cross-recurrence analysis , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  N. Wegner,et al.  Team and individual performances on a motor learning task. , 1956 .

[6]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  From social behaviour to brain synchronization: Review and perspectives in hyperscanning , 2011 .

[8]  L. Astolfi,et al.  Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: Past, present and future , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Feedforward impedance control efficiently reduce motor variability , 2009, Neuroscience Research.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  M. Gerbella,et al.  Two different mirror neuron networks: The sensorimotor (hand) and limbic (face) pathways , 2017, Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[16]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[18]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Dynamic Dominance Persists During Unsupported Reaching , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Interactional leader–follower sensorimotor communication strategies during repetitive joint actions , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  Robin T. Bye,et al.  The BUMP model of response planning: intermittent predictive control accounts for 10 Hz physiological tremor. , 2010, Human movement science.

[22]  Derek Hoiem,et al.  Action Recognition , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[23]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Pratik K. Mutha,et al.  Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement , 2008, Brain Research.

[25]  R. Miall,et al.  Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  Chaozhe Zhu,et al.  Neural Synchronization during Face-to-Face Communication , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Fantoni,et al.  Faster but Less Careful Prehension in Presence of High, Rather than Low, Social Status Attendees , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  Toward a physiological understanding of human dexterity. , 2001, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[30]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Left-hand advantage in right-handers for spatial constant error: Preliminary evidence in a unimanual ballistic aimed movement , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Karen Zentgraf,et al.  Vision adds to haptics when dyads perform a whole-body joint balance task , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  R. Zajonc SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[34]  I Salimi,et al.  Specificity of internal representations underlying grasping. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Pratik K. Mutha,et al.  Rethinking Motor Lateralization: Specialized but Complementary Mechanisms for Motor Control of Each Arm , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  M. Candidi,et al.  And Yet They Act Together: Interpersonal Perception Modulates Visuo-Motor Interference and Mutual Adjustments during a Joint-Grasping Task , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  Maurice A Smith,et al.  Flexible Control of Safety Margins for Action Based on Environmental Variability , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Junya Masumoto,et al.  Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[42]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data , 2011 .

[43]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Interpersonal synergies: static prehension tasks performed by two actors , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  K. Newell,et al.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  M. Santello,et al.  Anticipatory Planning and Control of Grasp Positions and Forces for Dexterous Two-Digit Manipulation , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  D. Annis Dyadic Data Analysis , 2007 .

[48]  Nobuyuki Inui,et al.  Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  S. Vijayakumar,et al.  A Computational Model of Limb Impedance Control Based on Principles of Internal Model Uncertainty , 2010, PloS one.

[50]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  R. Schmidt,et al.  A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Panagiotis K. Artemiadis,et al.  Communication and Inference of Intended Movement Direction during Human–Human Physical Interaction , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[54]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  MOSAIC Model for Sensorimotor Learning and Control , 2001, Neural Computation.

[55]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  Interpersonal Fitts’ law: when two perform as one , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Stochastic Optimal Control and Estimation Methods Adapted to the Noise Characteristics of the Sensorimotor System , 2005, Neural Computation.

[57]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Brady T. West,et al.  Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software , 2006 .

[59]  C. Frith,et al.  Follow you, Follow me: Continuous Mutual Prediction and Adaptation in Joint Tapping , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  T. Bajd,et al.  Force tracking system for the assessment of grip force control in patients with neuromuscular diseases. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[61]  Kyle B. Reed,et al.  Physical Collaboration of Human-Human and Human-Robot Teams , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[62]  Christopher A. Buneo,et al.  Effective Neural Representations for Brain-Mediated Human-Robot Interactions , 2014 .

[63]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Mere presence and social facilitation: One more time , 1986 .

[64]  L. Ting,et al.  Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[65]  Marco Santello,et al.  Extraction of Time and Frequency Features From Grip Force Rates During Dexterous Manipulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[66]  M. Kawato,et al.  Two is better than one: Physical interactions improve motor performance in humans , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[67]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Control of asymmetrical bimanual movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[69]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Handedness can be explained by a serial hybrid control scheme , 2014, Neuroscience.

[70]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Avoiding Accidents at the Champagne Reception , 2017, Psychological science.

[71]  Robrecht P R D van der Wel,et al.  Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Force-stabilizing synergies in motor tasks involving two actors , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  L. Selen,et al.  Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  Masamichi J. Hayashi,et al.  “Stay Tuned”: Inter-Individual Neural Synchronization During Mutual Gaze and Joint Attention , 2010, Front. Integr. Neurosci..