Adaptive Quantum State Tomography with Active Learning

Recently, tremendous progress has been made in the field of quantum science and technologies: different platforms for quantum simulation as well as quantum computing, ranging from superconducting qubits to neutral atoms, are starting to reach unprecedentedly large systems. In order to benchmark these systems and gain physical insights, the need for efficient tools to characterize quantum states arises. The exponential growth of the Hilbert space with system size renders a full reconstruction of the quantum state prohibitively demanding in terms of the number of necessary measurements. Here we propose and implement an efficient scheme for quantum state tomography using active learning. Based on a few initial measurements, the active learning protocol proposes the next measurement basis, designed to yield the maximum information gain. We apply the active learning quantum state tomography scheme to reconstruct different multi-qubit states with varying degree of entanglement as well as to ground states of the XXZ model in 1D and a kinetically constrained spin chain. In all cases, we obtain a significantly improved reconstruction as compared to a reconstruction based on the exact same number of measurements and measurement configurations, but with randomly chosen basis configurations. Our scheme is highly relevant to gain physical insights in quantum many-body systems as well as for benchmarking and characterizing quantum devices, e.g. for quantum simulation, and paves the way for scalable adaptive protocols to probe, prepare, and manipulate quantum systems.

[1]  M. Di Ventra,et al.  Transformer quantum state: A multipurpose model for quantum many-body problems , 2022, Physical Review B.

[2]  Hongwei Chen,et al.  Neural network representation for minimally entangled typical thermal states , 2022, Physical Review B.

[3]  R. Melko,et al.  Data-enhanced variational Monte Carlo simulations for Rydberg atom arrays , 2022, Physical Review B.

[4]  J. Carrasquilla,et al.  How To Use Neural Networks To Investigate Quantum Many-Body Physics , 2021, PRX Quantum.

[5]  U. Schollwöck,et al.  Snapshot-based characterization of particle currents and the Hall response in synthetic flux lattices , 2021, Physical Review A.

[6]  Xi Chen,et al.  Active Learning for the Optimal Design of Multinomial Classification in Physics , 2021, ArXiv.

[7]  M. Lukin,et al.  Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator , 2021, Science.

[8]  H. Neven,et al.  Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor , 2021, Science.

[9]  U. Schollwöck,et al.  Confinement and Mott Transitions of Dynamical Charges in One-Dimensional Lattice Gauge Theories. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[10]  Adebayo Felix Adekoya,et al.  Models in quantum computing: a systematic review , 2021, Quantum Information Processing.

[11]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  U(1)-symmetric recurrent neural networks for quantum state reconstruction , 2020, Physical Review A.

[12]  Franco Nori,et al.  Quantum State Tomography with Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks , 2020, Physical review letters.

[13]  Felix Wu,et al.  Attention-based quantum tomography , 2020, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Yadong Wu,et al.  Active Learning Approach to Optimization of Experimental Control , 2020, Chinese Physics Letters.

[15]  R. Kueng,et al.  Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements , 2020, Nature Physics.

[16]  R. Melko,et al.  Recurrent neural network wave functions , 2020, Physical Review Research.

[17]  Alicia J. Kollár,et al.  Quantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities , 2019, 1912.06938.

[18]  E. Solano,et al.  Retrieving Quantum Information with Active Learning. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[19]  M. Schecter,et al.  Quantum many-body scar states with emergent kinetic constraints and finite-entanglement revivals , 2019, Physical Review B.

[20]  F. Grusdt,et al.  Confined Phases of One-Dimensional Spinless Fermions Coupled to Z_{2} Gauge Theory. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[21]  J. Cirac,et al.  Restricted Boltzmann machines in quantum physics , 2019, Nature Physics.

[22]  M. S. Albergo,et al.  Learnability scaling of quantum states: Restricted Boltzmann machines , 2019, Physical Review B.

[23]  Lucy Rosenbloom arXiv , 2019, The Charleston Advisor.

[24]  Binghai Yan,et al.  Active learning algorithm for computational physics , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[25]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Integrating Neural Networks with a Quantum Simulator for State Reconstruction. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[26]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  QuCumber: wavefunction reconstruction with neural networks , 2018, SciPost Physics.

[27]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Reconstructing quantum states with generative models , 2018, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Scott Pakin,et al.  Quantum Algorithm Implementations for Beginners , 2018, ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing.

[29]  David J. Schwab,et al.  A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists , 2018, Physics reports.

[30]  Giacomo Torlai,et al.  Latent Space Purification via Neural Density Operators. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[31]  John Preskill,et al.  Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.

[32]  C. Hubig Symmetry-protected tensor networks , 2017 .

[33]  Simone Severini,et al.  Learning hard quantum distributions with variational autoencoders , 2017, npj Quantum Information.

[34]  J. Maciejko,et al.  Simple Z 2 lattice gauge theories at finite fermion density , 2017, 1708.08507.

[35]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Neural-network quantum state tomography , 2017, Nature Physics.

[36]  Lu-Ming Duan,et al.  Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[37]  J. Chen,et al.  Equivalence of restricted Boltzmann machines and tensor network states , 2017, 1701.04831.

[38]  C. F. Roos,et al.  Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system , 2016, Nature Physics.

[39]  武田 一哉,et al.  Recurrent Neural Networkに基づく日常生活行動認識 , 2016 .

[40]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.

[41]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  Self-guided quantum tomography. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[42]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Adaptive quantum state tomography improves accuracy quadratically. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[43]  M B Plenio,et al.  Scalable reconstruction of density matrices. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[44]  J. Dalibard,et al.  Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases , 2012, Nature Physics.

[45]  Andrew J. Ferris,et al.  Perfect Sampling with Unitary Tensor Networks , 2012, 1201.3974.

[46]  N. Houlsby,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian quantum tomography , 2011, 1107.0895.

[47]  D. Gross,et al.  Efficient quantum state tomography. , 2010, Nature communications.

[48]  U. Schollwoeck The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , 2010, 1008.3477.

[49]  O. Gühne,et al.  Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions , 2005, Nature.

[50]  W. Munro,et al.  Adaptive quantum tomography , 2004, InternationalQuantum Electronics Conference, 2004. (IQEC)..

[51]  Dan Roth,et al.  Learning cost-sensitive active classifiers , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[52]  Edward Y. Chang,et al.  Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[53]  D. Phoenix Annual Review , 2000, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[54]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Employing EM and Pool-Based Active Learning for Text Classification , 1998, ICML.

[55]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Selective Sampling Using the Query by Committee Algorithm , 1997, Machine Learning.

[56]  Z. Hradil Quantum-state estimation , 1996, quant-ph/9609012.

[57]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Distributional Clustering of English Words , 1993, ACL.

[58]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Query by committee , 1992, COLT '92.

[59]  C. T. Ng,et al.  Measures of distance between probability distributions , 1989 .

[60]  M. Gärttner,et al.  Scalable quantum state tomography with artificial neural networks , 2021 .

[61]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[62]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[63]  James S. Langer,et al.  Annual review of condensed matter physics , 2010 .

[64]  Burr Settles,et al.  Active Learning Literature Survey , 2009 .

[65]  Gökhan Tür,et al.  Combining active and semi-supervised learning for spoken language understanding , 2005, Speech Commun..

[66]  Samuel B. Williams,et al.  ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY , 2000 .

[67]  and as an in , 2022 .