Nonlinear process monitoring based on linear subspace and Bayesian inference

Abstract This paper proposes a novel linear subspace and Bayesian inference based monitoring method for nonlinear processes. Through the introduced linear subspace method, the original nonlinear space can be approximated by several linear subspaces, based on which different monitoring sub-models are developed. A new subspace contribution index is defined for variable selection in each subspace. Monitoring results are first generated in each subspace, and then transferred to fault probabilities by the Bayesian inference strategy. To make the final monitoring decision, subspace monitoring results are combined together with their fault probabilities. Additionally, a corresponding fault diagnosis method is also developed. To demonstrate the computationally efficiency of the proposed method, detailed comparisons of the algorithm complexity for different methods are provided. Case studies of a numerical example and the Tennessee Eastman (TE) benchmark process both show the efficiency of the proposed method.

[1]  Manabu Kano,et al.  Comparison of multivariate statistical process monitoring methods with applications to the Eastman challenge problem , 2002 .

[2]  Xun Wang,et al.  Nonlinear PCA With the Local Approach for Diesel Engine Fault Detection and Diagnosis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[3]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Robust Online Monitoring for Multimode Processes Based on Nonlinear External Analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Julian Morris,et al.  On-line monitoring of a sugar crystallization process , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  T. McAvoy,et al.  Nonlinear principal component analysis—Based on principal curves and neural networks , 1996 .

[6]  C. Yoo,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis , 2004 .

[7]  X. Wang,et al.  Multidimensional Visualization of Principal Component Scores for Process Historical Data Analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  Autoassociative neural networks , 1992 .

[9]  George W. Irwin,et al.  Fault reconstruction in linear dynamic systems using multivariate statistics , 2006 .

[10]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[11]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Generalized contribution plots in multivariate statistical process monitoring , 2000 .

[12]  Atul Negi,et al.  SubXPCA and a generalized feature partitioning approach to principal component analysis , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Grigorios Dimitriadis,et al.  Diagnosis of Process Faults in Chemical Systems Using a Local Partial Least Squares Approach , 2008 .

[14]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .

[15]  George W. Irwin,et al.  Introduction of a nonlinearity measure for principal component models , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem , 1995 .

[17]  S. Qin,et al.  Improved nonlinear fault detection technique and statistical analysis , 2008 .

[18]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2003 .

[19]  David J. Sandoz,et al.  Extended PLS approach for enhanced condition monitoring of industrial processes , 2001 .

[20]  Si-Zhao Joe Qin,et al.  Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring , 2009, Autom..

[21]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction , 1998 .

[22]  Chunhui Zhao,et al.  Dissimilarity analysis based batch process monitoring using moving windows , 2007 .

[23]  Dale E. Seborg,et al.  Evaluation of a pattern matching method for the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 2006 .

[24]  J. Romagnoli,et al.  A multi-scale orthogonal nonlinear strategy for multi-variate statistical process monitoring , 2006 .

[25]  Min-Sen Chiu,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring using JITL-PCA , 2005 .

[26]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .