Perceptions on LCA implementation: evidence from a survey on adopters and nonadopters in Italy

PurposeThis paper introduces the results of an Italian survey on the implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA). Both LCA adopters and nonadopters were involved, in order to understand the main benefits and barriers to the adoption of LCA and how the experiences of LCA adopters differ from the expectations of nonadopters.MethodsApproximately 2000 Italian companies were contacted and 122 companies participated in the online survey, which represent the 6.5 % of the statistical population of our study. To define the statistical population, firms that had implemented an LCA or an environmental initiative according to an official international standard were only considered. Statistically significant differences in answers between LCA adopters and nonadopters were tested by performing the Mann–Whitney test.Results and discussionCompanies recognize that LCA can provide useful information to drive strategic decisions and product design, and it is perceived as an opportunity to improve the current monitoring systems. In addition, companies recognize the potential of LCA in marketing, making the communication of green attributes more substantial and robust. Focusing on the barriers experienced by LCA adopters, data collection can be cited. Communication issues also pose a barrier to the further implementation of LCA. The analysis of the results and the comparison of the results for the two groups of respondents highlight that on average, the difficulties are considered as more important than the benefits and that nonadopters tend to overestimate the difficulties and underestimate the benefits connected to the implementation of LCA.ConclusionsThe findings shed light on LCA-related issues both for companies and public servants. The misconception of LCA by nonadopters suggests that an increased awareness is the key to the success of LCA and to its more widespread adoption by companies. It is essential to create and disseminate know-how and sensitize companies to the real barriers and benefits of adopting an LCA. The awareness of potential LCA adopters can be raised by training and education initiatives, as well as by increased possibilities to experiment with these kinds of tools (public programs for financial support, fiscal incentives). On the other hand, market and communication research would contribute to better understand how the environmental impacts of products can be more effectively communicated to clients and consumers.

[1]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[2]  Allan Rennie,et al.  SME application of LCA‐based carbon footprints , 2008 .

[3]  Sara Pax,et al.  A Survey of Life Cycle Assessment Practitioners with a Focus on the Agri‐Food Sector , 2011 .

[4]  F. Testa,et al.  Is an Environmental Management System able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) in the European Union , 2009 .

[5]  O. Boiral,et al.  ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a Research Agenda on Management System Standards , 2013 .

[6]  Luca Ruini,et al.  LCA METHODOLOGY FROM ANALYSIS TO ACTIONS: EXAMPLES OF BARILLA'S IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS , 2013 .

[7]  Friederike Ziegler,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Canned Sardine Product from Portugal , 2015 .

[8]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Bridges , 2013 .

[9]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general , 2000 .

[10]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Life cycle analysis: A critique , 1995 .

[11]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Commission Recommendation on the use ofcommon methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performanceof products and organisations , 2013 .

[14]  Neil A. Weiss,et al.  Introductory Statistics , 1982 .

[15]  K. Tan,et al.  The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance , 2012 .

[16]  S. Hart A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[17]  D. Williamson,et al.  Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR , 2006 .

[18]  David Hunkeler,et al.  The Future of Life Cycle Assessment , 2005 .

[19]  G. Hagelaar,et al.  Environmental Supply Chain Management: using Life Cycle Assessment to structure supply chains , 2001 .

[20]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Who Cares About Life Cycle Assessment , 2014 .

[21]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  Input, Output, and Environmental Management Productivity: Effects on Firm Performance , 2015 .

[22]  Haitao Yin,et al.  Why Do Standardized ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Lead to Heterogeneous Environmental Outcomes? , 2008 .

[23]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[24]  A. Schaefer Contrasting Institutional and Performance Accounts of Environmental Management Systems: Three Case Studies in the UK Water & Sewerage Industry , 2007 .

[25]  Katsuyuki Nakano,et al.  Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA , 2011 .

[26]  Nicole Darnall Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification , 2006 .

[27]  Gerd Scholl,et al.  The environmental benefits to German companies through application of LCA , 1998 .

[28]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective , 2003 .

[29]  Petra Christmann,et al.  Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation , 2006 .

[30]  Johanna Berlin,et al.  Product Chain Actors' Potential for Greening the Product Life Cycle , 2008 .

[31]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[32]  Ian A. Harwood,et al.  The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive? , 2009 .

[33]  Carol Boyle,et al.  Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair , 2008 .

[34]  Claire Early,et al.  Informing Packaging Design Decisions at Toyota Motor Sales Using Life Cycle Assessment and Costing , 2009 .

[35]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life Cycle Approach in the Procurement Process: The Case of Defence Materiel (9 pp) , 2006 .

[36]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[37]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview , 2005 .

[38]  Gwenola Bertoluci,et al.  Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs , 2006 .

[39]  Francesco Testa,et al.  EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance , 2014 .

[40]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Dissemination, Application and Assessment of LCA in Industry (25th LCA Discussion Forum at ETH Zürich, Switzerland) , 2005 .

[41]  M. Toffel,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL DEMANDS , 2008 .

[42]  F. Rubik,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) IN BUSINESS AN OVERVIEW ON DRIVERS, APPLICATIONS, ISSUES AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[43]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[44]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Do Environmental Management Systems Improve Business Performance in an International Setting? , 2008 .

[45]  Garrette Clark,et al.  How to improve adoption of LCA , 1999 .

[46]  Iñ´aki Heras Saizarbitoria,et al.  ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model , 2006 .

[47]  M. J. Thorn,et al.  Life‐cycle assessment as a sustainability management tool: Strengths, weaknesses, and other considerations , 2011 .

[48]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance , 2005 .

[49]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[50]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[51]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[52]  Martí Casadesús,et al.  ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model , 2008 .

[53]  J. Fava,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey: Summary of Results , 2006 .

[54]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  The Hitch Hiker´s Guide to LCA - An orientation in LCA methodology and application , 2006 .

[55]  F. Testa,et al.  Factors Affecting Environmental Management by Small and Micro Firms: The Importance of Entrepreneurs’ Attitudes and Environmental Investment , 2016 .

[56]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  The Importance of LCAs—Warts and All , 1997 .

[57]  Pavel Castka,et al.  The effect of pressure from secondary stakeholders on the internalization of ISO 14001 , 2013 .

[58]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[59]  E. Welch,et al.  The Promises and Pitfalls of ISO 14001 for Competitiveness and Sustainability , 2003 .

[60]  Francesco Testa,et al.  Why Eco-labels can be Effective Marketing Tools: Evidence from a Study on Italian Consumers , 2015 .

[61]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification With the ISO 14001 Management Standard , 2005 .

[62]  M. Toffel,et al.  Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box , 2008 .

[63]  Timothy M. Smith,et al.  Exploring the use and impact of LCA-based information in corporate communications , 2009 .

[64]  Matthew Franchetti,et al.  ISO 14001 and solid waste generation rates in US manufacturing organizations: an analysis of relationship , 2011 .

[65]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .