Changes in glucose metabolism during and after radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND Evaluation of the metabolic response to radiotherapy in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients is commonly performed about three months after the end of radiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to assess with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose changes in glucose metabolism during and after radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN In 6 patients, PET/CT scans with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose were performed before (PET0), during (PET1; at a median of 14 days before the end of radiotherapy) and after the end of radiotherapy (PET2 and PET3, at a median of 28 and 93 days, respectively). The metabolic response was scored according to visual and semiquantitative criteria. RESULTS Standardize maximum uptake at PET1 (7.9 +/- 4.8), PET2 (5.1 +/- 4.1) and PET3 (2.7 +/- 3.1) were all significantly (P < 0.05; ANOVA repeated measures) lower than at PET0 (16.1 +/- 10.1). Standardized maximum uptake at PET1 was significantly higher than at both PET2 and PET3. There were no significant differences in SUV(max) between PET2 and PET3. PET3 identified 4 complete and 2 partial metabolic responses, whereas PET1 identified 6 partial metabolic responses. Radiotherapy-induced increased [l8F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake could be visually distinguished from tumor uptake based on PET/CT integration and was less frequent at PET1 (n = 2) than at PET3 (n = 6). CONCLUSION In non-small cell lung cancer, radiotherapy induces a progressive decrease in glucose metabolism that is greater 3 months after the end of treatment but can be detected during the treatment itself. Glucose avid, radiotherapy-induced inflammation is more evident after the end of radiotherapy than during radiotherapy and does not preclude the interpretation of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose images, particularly when using PET/CT.

[1]  D. Salvo,et al.  The Impact of 18F-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography on Tumor Staging, Treatment Strategy and Treatment Planning for Radiotherapy in a Department of Radiation Oncology , 2004, Tumori.

[2]  M. Eble,et al.  [18F] fluoromisonidazole and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response evaluation after chemo-/radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[3]  B. Neyns,et al.  Complete metabolic tumour response, assessed by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET), after induction chemotherapy predicts a favourable outcome in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2008, Lung cancer.

[4]  J. Matthews,et al.  Metabolic (FDG-PET) response after radical radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer correlates with patterns of failure. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[5]  R. Coleman,et al.  Serial Evaluation of Increased Chest Wall F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Uptake Following Radiation Therapy in Patients With Bronchogenic Carcinoma. , 1998, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[6]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  A technique for adaptive image-guided helical tomotherapy for lung cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  M. Eble,et al.  Sequential (gemcitabine/vinorelbine) and concurrent (gemcitabine) radiochemotherapy with FDG-PET-based target volume definition in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: first results of a phase I/II study , 2007, BMC Cancer.

[8]  H. Dittmann,et al.  Repeat 18F-FDG PET for monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. , 2007, Lung Cancer.

[9]  V Kalff,et al.  The utility of (18)F-FDG PET for suspected recurrent non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative therapy: impact on management and prognostic stratification. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  F. Fazio,et al.  Role of Computed Tomographyand [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Image Fusion in Conformal Radiotherapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparison with Standard Techniques with and without Elective Nodal Irradiation , 2007, Tumori.

[11]  F. Alongi,et al.  Combining Independent Studies of Diagnostic Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2006, Tumori.

[12]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[13]  N. Mikhaeel,et al.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  M. Eble,et al.  Gemcitabine Concurrent with Thoracic Radiotherapy after Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine/Vinorelbine in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2006, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[15]  R. Cerfolio,et al.  Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  V. Lowe,et al.  Positron emission tomography in the pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: preliminary findings. , 1996, American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  H. Dittmann,et al.  Is standardised 18F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer? , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Impact of the type of imaging modality on target volumes delineation and dose distribution in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between pre- and per-treatment studies. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  John L. Humm,et al.  Use of PET to monitor the response of lung cancer to radiation treatment , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  W. Weber,et al.  PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy , 2005 .

[22]  A. Giatromanolaki,et al.  Cancer vascularization: implications in radiotherapy? , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. M. Mac Manus,et al.  Impact of PET on radiation therapy planning in lung cancer. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[24]  P. Lambin,et al.  Time trends in the maximal uptake of FDG on PET scan during thoracic radiotherapy. A prospective study in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients , 2007 .

[25]  T. Miyamoto,et al.  Radiosensitivity of hypoxic and proliferating clonogen in a human lung cancer grown in nude mice. , 2005, Oncology reports.

[26]  J. Leonard,et al.  PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  R. Cerfolio,et al.  Positron emission tomography scanning with 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose as a predictor of response of neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell carcinoma. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[28]  David Binns,et al.  Early FDG-PET imaging after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: inflammatory changes in normal tissues correlate with tumor response and do not confound therapeutic response evaluation. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  V. Lowe,et al.  Update in PET imaging of nonsmall cell lung cancer. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[30]  Matthias Reimold,et al.  18F-FDG PET for assessment of therapy response and preoperative re-evaluation after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  M. Parmar,et al.  Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial , 1997, The Lancet.

[32]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  J. Hatazawa,et al.  Clinical assessment of therapeutic effects on cancer using 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and positron emission tomography: preliminary study of lung cancer. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  P. Dupont,et al.  Potential use of FDG-PET scan after induction chemotherapy in surgically staged IIIa-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective pilot study. The Leuven Lung Cancer Group. , 1998, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[35]  S. Marnitz,et al.  Value of 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer for Prediction of Pathologic Response and Times to Relapse after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  H. Kiat,et al.  Fluorine-18 FDG Dual-Head Gamma Camera Coincidence Imaging of Radiation Pneumonitis , 2000, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[37]  Atif J. Khan,et al.  Positron emission tomography demonstrates radiation-induced changes to nonirradiated lungs in lung cancer patients treated with radiation and chemotherapy. , 2005, Chest.