Automated Visual Scanpath Analysis Reveals the Expertise Level of Micro-neurosurgeons

Exploring the effects of expertise on eye movements and visual search behavior of surgeons may help to improve and speed up the training of novices. However, comparing scan patterns to each other is a non-trivial task. This work employs several state-of-the-art, automated scan pattern comparison methods to re-analyze eye-tracking data of neurosurgeons that was captured during the observation of a tumor removal. We evaluate whether these methods can reproduce the findings from the original manual analysis and compare their performance regarding different eye-tracking metrics. Among the considered methods, SubsMatch revealed significant differences between eye movement patterns of expert surgeons and novices for all stimulus images.

[1]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  iComp: a tool for scanpath visualization and comparison , 2006, APGV.

[2]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Book Review: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  W. Rosenstiel,et al.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study. , 2014, Translational vision science & technology.

[5]  Werner X. Schneider,et al.  Functionally sequenced scanpath similarity method (FuncSim): Comparing and evaluating scanpath similarity based on a task’s inherent sequence of functional (action) units , 2013 .

[6]  D. Munoz,et al.  Altered control of visual fixation and saccadic eye movements in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Nodine,et al.  Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. , 1987, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  W. Rosenstiel,et al.  Driving with Binocular Visual Field Loss? A Study on a Supervised On-Road Parcours with Simultaneous Eye and Head Tracking , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Patrick C. Brennan,et al.  Direction of an initial saccade depends on radiological expertise , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[10]  R. C. Langford.  How People Look at Pictures, A Study of the Psychology of Perception in Art. , 1936 .

[11]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  A simple way to estimate similarity between pairs of eye movement sequences , 2012 .

[12]  Leanne M. Williams,et al.  ADHD and schizophrenia phenomenology: Visual scanpaths to emotional faces as a potential psychophysiological marker? , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Sébastien Miellet,et al.  iMap: a novel method for statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[15]  T. Foulsham,et al.  It depends on how you look at it: Scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[16]  M. Stella Atkins,et al.  Eye gaze patterns differentiate novice and experts in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment , 2004, ETRA.

[17]  Markku Tukiainen,et al.  Gaze behaviour of expert and novice microneurosurgeons differs during observations of tumor removal recordings , 2012, ETRA '12.

[18]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  SubsMatch: scanpath similarity in dynamic scenes based on subsequence frequencies , 2014, ETRA.

[19]  N. Charness,et al.  Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence From Eye Movements , 2001, Psychological science.

[20]  W. Rosenstiel,et al.  Binocular Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration - A Supermarket Study , 2014, PloS one.