Effect of task constraint on reaching performance in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.

The purposes of the study were to examine the effect of task constraint on the reaching performance in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and to examine the correlations between the reaching performance and postural control. Eight children with CP and 16 typically developing (TD) children participated in the study. They performed a reach-and-return task with a seated posture on a stool. The target for reaching was set at a 120% arm-length distance in three directions (anterior, medial, and lateral). Reaching speed was modulated with a metronome at a rate of 46 beats/min. A motion analysis system recorded the kinematic data of reaching at a sampling rate of 150 Hz. Postural control was assessed with a pediatric reaching test. Movement time (MT), straightness ratio (SR), hand peak velocity (PV), and movement unit (MU) of reaching were compared between groups and among task conditions with repeated measure ANOVAs. Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients were used to examine the correlations between reaching and postural control. Children with CP presented longer MT, larger SR and more MU than did TD children. Further, the children with CP showed larger SR while reaching medially and laterally than anteriorly. But TD children were not affected by these task constraints. Moderate correlations between postural control ability and SR and MU were noted. In conclusion, the children with CP showed a slower, more skewed, less efficient and less coordinated pattern of reaching than the TD children. Reaching laterally and medially seemed to impair the reaching performance (more skewed and less efficient) of the children with CP, but not of the TD children. Reaching laterally and medially may involve trunk rotation which produces more postural challenges than reaching anteriorly. This finding may explain the difference in the effect of task constraint on hand reaching performance between the two groups of children. Moreover, the better the postural control ability, the straighter, and more efficient and coordinated reaching performance the children showed.

[1]  Eliseo Stefano Maini,et al.  Kinematic characterization of functional reach to grasp in normal and in motor disabled children. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[2]  R W Cooke,et al.  Birthweight specific trends in cerebral palsy. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[3]  Bert Otten,et al.  Effect of Seat Surface Inclination on Postural Control During Reaching in Preterm Children With Cerebral Palsy , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[4]  Esther Thelen,et al.  Posture and the emergence of manual skills , 2000 .

[5]  L. Wendt,et al.  The Changing Panorama of Cerebral Palsy in Sweden , 1989, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[6]  Trevor Birmingham,et al.  Validity and Reliability of a Pediatric Reach Test , 2003, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[7]  M. Smyth.  Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory and control : D. Goodman, R. Wilberg and I. Franks (eds.) (Advances in Psychology series.) Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985 , 1986 .

[8]  M. Hadders‐Algra,et al.  Kinematic Characteristics of Reaching Movements in Preterm Children with Cerebral Palsy , 2005, Pediatric Research.

[9]  Influence of two different sitting positions on postural adjustments in children with spastic diplegia , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[10]  C. Morris,et al.  Gross Motor Function Classification System: impact and utility. , 2004, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[11]  P. Burtner,et al.  Postural Control in Children , 2004, Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.

[12]  Qualls,et al.  Muscle activation characteristics of stance balance control in children with spastic cerebral palsy. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[13]  Rong-Ju Cherng,et al.  Effect of seat surface inclination on postural stability and forward reaching efficiency in children with spastic cerebral palsy. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[14]  P. Raina,et al.  Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. , 2002, JAMA.

[15]  K. Newell.  Coordination, Control and Skill , 1985 .

[16]  N. Gantchev,et al.  From basic motor control to functional recovery , 1999 .

[17]  Effect of Task Goals on the Reaching Patterns of Children With Cerebral Palsy , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  Kinematical measure for spastic reaching in children with cerebral palsy. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Training users in the gross motor function measure: methodological and practical issues. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[20]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Observations on the development of reaching for moving objects. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  D. Cadman,et al.  THE GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE: A MEANS TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY , 1989, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[22]  A. Mathew,et al.  The control of reaching movements by young infants. , 1990, Child development.

[23]  J. Bonar.  Physical Therapy for Children , 1995 .

[24]  P. Grimaud.  [Cerebral palsy]. , 1972, Pediatrie.

[25]  J. Konczak,et al.  The development of goal-directed reaching in infants: hand trajectory formation and joint torque control , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.