Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.

BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pacemakers is a relative contraindication because of the risks to the patient from potentially hazardous interactions between the MRI and the pacemaker system. Chest scans (ie, cardiac magnetic resonance scans) are of particular importance and higher risk. The previously Food and Drug Administration-approved magnetic resonance conditional system includes positioning restrictions, limiting the powerful utility of MRI. OBJECTIVE To confirm the safety and effectiveness of a pacemaker system designed for safe whole body MRI without MRI scan positioning restrictions. METHODS Primary eligibility criteria included standard dual-chamber pacing indications. Patients (n = 263) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo 16 chest and head scans at 1.5 T between 9 and 12 weeks postimplant (n = 177) or to not undergo MRI (n = 86) post-implant. Evaluation of the pacemaker system occurred immediately before, during (monitoring), and after MRI, 1-week post-MRI, and 1-month post-MRI, and similarly for controls. Primary end points measured the MRI-related complication-free rate for safety and compared pacing capture threshold between MRI and control subjects for effectiveness. RESULTS There were no MRI-related complications during or after MRI in subjects undergoing MRI (n = 148). Differences in pacing capture threshold values from pre-MRI to 1-month post-MRI were minimal and similar between the MRI and control groups. CONCLUSIONS This randomized trial demonstrates that the Advisa MRI pulse generator and CapSureFix MRI 5086MRI lead system is safe and effective in the 1.5 T MRI environment without positioning restrictions for MRI scans or limitations of body parts scanned.

[1]  H. Halperin,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of a Protocol for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Image-guided cardiac resynchronization. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  Timm Dickfeld,et al.  MRI-Guided Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Integration of Late Gadolinium-Enhanced 3D Scar in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[4]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemaker , 2008, Circulation.

[5]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrophysiology studies in humans. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  L. A. Bonet,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2012, Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir.

[7]  J. Avery Loss Prevention case of the month. Not my responsibility! , 1988, Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association.

[8]  P. Zimetbaum,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cardiac Devices: How Safe Is Safe Enough? , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  J. Gimbel Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Devices at 3.0 Tesla , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[11]  N. Ferris,et al.  The 2005 Australian MRI safety survey. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Gimbel Unexpected asystole during 3T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a 'modern' pacemaker. , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  B. Demirkan,et al.  High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  Kenneth A Ellenbogen,et al.  Complications arising after implantation of DDD pacemakers: the MOST experience. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  J. Schwitter,et al.  Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial) , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[16]  Xu Yan,et al.  Missing Data Handling Methods in Medical Device Clinical Trials , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[17]  I. Ford,et al.  Validation of Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Fractional Flow Reserve for the Detection of Significant Coronary Heart Disease , 2009, Circulation.

[18]  Javad Parvizi,et al.  Chapter 148 – MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) , 2010 .

[19]  J Rod Gimbel,et al.  Unexpected pacing inhibition upon exposure to the 3T static magnetic field prior to imaging acquisition: what is the mechanism? , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[20]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsqqq , 2018 .

[21]  Loss prevention case of the month. , 1992, Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association.

[22]  Patrick M Colletti,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[23]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2012, European journal of heart failure.

[24]  A. Hoes,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[25]  O. Faris,et al.  Food and Drug Administration perspective: Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. , 2006, Circulation.

[26]  Avery Jk Loss Prevention case of the month. Not my responsibility , 1988 .

[27]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2007, Circulation.

[28]  Saman Nazarian,et al.  How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[29]  H. Schild,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  K. Dickstein,et al.  Aliskiren, ALTITUDE, and the implications for ATMOSPHERE , 2012, European journal of heart failure.

[31]  Werner Irnich,et al.  Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[32]  Claudia Stöllberger,et al.  Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2009, Heart rhythm.