Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Area Under the Curve from Destructively Obtained Pharmacokinetic Data

The area under the curve (AUC) of the concentration–time curve for a drug or metabolite, and the variation associated with the AUC, are primary results of most pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. In nonclinical PK studies, it is often the case that experimental units contribute data for only a single time point. In such cases, it is straightforward to apply noncompartmental methods to determine an estimate of the AUC. In this report, we investigate noncompartmental estimation of the AUC using the log-trapezoidal rule during the elimination phase of the concentration–time profile, and we account for the underlying distribution of data at each sampling time. For data that follow a normal distribution, the log-trapezoidal rule is applied to arithmetic means at each time point of the elimination phase of the concentration–time profile. For data that follow a lognormal distribution, as is common with PK data, the log-trapezoidal rule is applied to geometric means at each time point during elimination. Since the log-trapezoidal rule incorporates nonlinear combinations of mean concentrations at each sampling time, obtaining an estimate of the corresponding variation about theAUC is not straightforward. Estimation of this variance is further complicated by the occurrence of lognormal data. First-order approximations to the variance of AUC estimates are derived under the assumptions of normality, and lognormality, of concentrations at each sampling time. AUC estimates and variance approximations are utilized to form confidence intervals. Accuracies of confidence intervals are tested using simulation studies.

[1]  K. C. Yeh,et al.  A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation , 1978, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[2]  Betty Jones Whitten,et al.  Estimation in the Three-Parameter Lognormal Distribution , 1980 .

[3]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[4]  Bailer Aj,et al.  Randomization Tests for Assessing the Equality of Area Under Curves for Studies Using Destructive Sampling , 1996 .

[5]  B. J. Winer,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd Edition. , 1973 .

[6]  R. Serfling Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics , 1980 .

[7]  J. Yuan,et al.  Estimation of variance for AUC in animal studies. , 1993, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  M. Gibaldi,et al.  Pharmacokinetics, Second Edition , 1982 .

[9]  W. L. Chiou,et al.  Critical evaluation of the potential error in pharmacokinetic studies of using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level-time curve , 1978, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[10]  J. Nedelman,et al.  Performance of Bailer's Method for AUC Confidence Intervals from Sparse Non-Normally Distributed Drug Concentrations in Toxicokinetic Studies , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[11]  Harald Heinzl,et al.  A note on testing areas under the curve when using destructive measurement techniques , 1996, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[12]  Ekaterina Gibiansky,et al.  Applying Bailer's Method for AUC Confidence Intervals to Sparse Sampling , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  J. Nedelman,et al.  The variance of a better AUC estimator for sparse, destructive sampling in toxicokinetics. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  S J Ruberg,et al.  Randomization Tests for Assessing the Equality of Area Under Curves for Studies Using Destructive Sampling , 1996, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[15]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniques , 1988, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[16]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .