Effect of Deposition and Protease Digestion on the Ex Vivo Activity of Antimicrobial Peptide-Coated Contact Lenses

A clinical study of antimicrobial contact lenses containing the cationic peptide Mel4 was conducted. The few adverse events that occurred with this lens occurred on or after 13 nights of wear. The current study examined whether the Mel4 contact lenses lost activity during wear and the mechanism of this loss. Participants wore contact lenses for up to 13 nights. Lenses were tested for their ability to reduce the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The amount of protein and lipid extracted from lenses was measured. The ability of trypsin to affect the antimicrobial activity of Mel4-coated contact lenses was measured. Mel4-coated contact lenses lost their antimicrobial activity at six nights of wear for both bacteria. The amount of lipids (13 ± 11 vs. 21 ± 14 μg/lens at 13 nights wear) and proteins (8 ± 4 vs. 10 ± 3 mg/lens at 13 nights of wear) extracted from lenses was not different between Mel4-coated and uncoated lenses, and was not different after three nights when antimicrobial activity was maintained and thirteen nights when they had lost activity (lipid: 25 ± 17 vs. 13 ± 11, p = 0.2; protein: 8 ± 1 vs. 8 ± 4 mg/lens, p = 0.4). Trypsin digestion eliminated the antimicrobial activity of Mel4-coated lenses. In summary, Mel4-coated contact lenses lost antibacterial activity at six nights of wear, and the most likely reason was proteolytic digestion of the peptide. Future studies will design and test proteolytically stable peptide mimics as coatings for contact lenses.

[1]  K. Augustyns,et al.  Proteases and Their Potential Role as Biomarkers and Drug Targets in Dry Eye Disease and Ocular Surface Dysfunction , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  F. Stapleton The Epidemiology of Infectious Keratitis. , 2021, The ocular surface.

[3]  Savitri Sharma,et al.  Effect of Antimicrobial Contact Lenses on Corneal Infiltrative Events: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2021, Translational vision science & technology.

[4]  Savitri Sharma,et al.  Ocular microbiota and lens contamination following Mel4 peptide-coated antimicrobial contact lens (MACL) extended wear. , 2021, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[5]  Rachel L. Williams,et al.  Poly‐ε‐Lysine or Mel4 Antimicrobial Surface Modification on a Novel Peptide Hydrogel Bandage Contact Lens , 2020, Advanced Materials Interfaces.

[6]  M. Mahlapuu,et al.  Antimicrobial peptides as therapeutic agents: opportunities and challenges , 2020, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[7]  M. Yasir,et al.  The Development of an Antimicrobial Contact Lens - From the Laboratory to the Clinic. , 2020, Current protein & peptide science.

[8]  T. Lu,et al.  Development and Challenges of Antimicrobial Peptides for Therapeutic Applications , 2020, Antibiotics.

[9]  M. Willcox,et al.  Development of Silicone Hydrogel Antimicrobial Contact Lenses with Mel4 Peptide Coating. , 2018, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  C. Postnikoff,et al.  Neutrophil and T-Cell Homeostasis in the Closed Eye , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  L. Subbaraman,et al.  In Vitro Effect of Lysozyme on Albumin Deposition to Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials. , 2017, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Lei Lu,et al.  Peptide‐mediated mast cell activation: ligand similarities for receptor recognition and protease‐induced regulation , 2017, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[13]  Lyndon Jones,et al.  Selectivity and localization of lysozyme uptake in contemporary hydrogel contact lens materials , 2017, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[14]  M. Willcox,et al.  Activity of a melimine derived peptide Mel4 against Stenotrophomonas, Delftia, Elizabethkingia, Burkholderia and biocompatibility as a contact lens coating. , 2017, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[15]  Mark D. P. Willcox,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of four cationic peptides immobilised to poly-hydroxyethylmethacrylate , 2016, Biofouling.

[16]  M. Guillon,et al.  Contact Lens Lipid Spoliation of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Lenses , 2014, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  M. Willcox,et al.  Antimicrobial contact lenses and lens cases: a review. , 2014, Eye & contact lens.

[18]  M. Willcox,et al.  Biocompatibility of Antimicrobial Melimine Lenses: Rabbit and Human Studies , 2014, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  S. Blanksby,et al.  A comparison of patient matched meibum and tear lipidomes. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  M. Willcox,et al.  A Laboratory Assessment of Factors That Affect Bacterial Adhesion to Contact Lenses , 2013, Biology.

[21]  M. Doğru,et al.  The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  D. Sullivan,et al.  Transcription, translation, and function of lubricin, a boundary lubricant, at the ocular surface. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[23]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Tear Lipid Layer and Contact Lens Comfort: A Review , 2013, Eye & contact lens.

[24]  G. Halliday,et al.  An Improved High-Throughput Lipid Extraction Method for the Analysis of Human Brain Lipids , 2013, Lipids.

[25]  A. Mcmahon,et al.  The Spectrophotometric Sulfo-Phospho-Vanillin Assessment of Total Lipids in Human Meibomian Gland Secretions , 2013, Lipids.

[26]  L. Jones,et al.  Protein Deposition and Clinical Symptoms in Daily Wear of Etafilcon Lenses , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  M. Willcox,et al.  Bacterial Adhesion to Unworn and Worn Silicone Hydrogel Lenses , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  D. Pye,et al.  Proteases, proteolysis and inflammatory molecules in the tears of people with keratoconus , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[29]  Oliver Schilling,et al.  NSP4, an elastase-related protease in human neutrophils with arginine specificity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Doerte Luensmann,et al.  Impact of Tear Film Components on Lysozyme Deposition to Contact Lenses , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  Lyndon Jones,et al.  Protein deposition on contact lenses: the past, the present, and the future. , 2012, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[32]  L. Jones,et al.  Influence of Protein Deposition on Bacterial Adhesion to Contact Lenses , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[33]  Q. Garrett,et al.  Bovine lactoferrin structures promoting corneal epithelial wound healing in vitro. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  A. Ho,et al.  The risk of vision loss in contact lens wear and following LASIK , 2009, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[35]  N. Kumar,et al.  A novel cationic‐peptide coating for the prevention of microbial colonization on contact lenses , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[36]  A. Schmidtchen,et al.  Evaluation of Strategies for Improving Proteolytic Resistance of Antimicrobial Peptides by Using Variants of EFK17, an Internal Segment of LL-37 , 2008, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[37]  Lisa Keay,et al.  Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis in daily disposable contact lens wear , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[38]  H. Griesser,et al.  Fimbrolide-Coated Antimicrobial Lenses: Their In Vitro and In Vivo Effects , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[39]  P. Messersmith,et al.  Protein, cell and bacterial fouling resistance of polypeptoid-modified surfaces: effect of side-chain chemistry. , 2008, Soft matter.

[40]  M. Kawashima,et al.  Deposition of Lipid, Protein, and Secretory Phospholipase A2 on Hydrophilic Contact Lenses , 2008, Eye & contact lens.

[41]  L. Jones,et al.  Lipid deposition on hydrogel contact lenses: how history can help us today. , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  L. Keay,et al.  The Epidemiology of Contact Lens Related Infiltrates , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[43]  R. Hancock,et al.  Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  P. Ascenzi,et al.  Proteolytic activity of bovine lactoferrin , 2004, Biometals.

[45]  Lyndon Jones,et al.  Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials , 2004, Current eye research.

[46]  Savitri Sharma,et al.  Clinical Characterization of Corneal Infiltrative Events Observed with Soft Contact Lens Wear , 2003, Cornea.

[47]  M. Senchyna,et al.  Lysozyme and Lipid Deposition on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[48]  P. Cho,et al.  Variability of tear protein levels in normal young adults: between-day variation , 2000, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[49]  B. Tighe,et al.  An in Vivo Comparison of the Kinetics of Protein and Lipid Deposition on Group II and Group IV Frequent-Replacement Contact Lenses , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  반데르란더글라스,et al.  Biomedical devices with antimicrobial coatings , 1999 .

[51]  B. Tighe,et al.  Influence of Contact Lens Material Surface Characteristics and Replacement Frequency on Protein and Lipid Deposition , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[52]  B. Tighe,et al.  Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. , 1997, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[53]  D. Korb,et al.  Meibomian gland phospholipids. , 1996, Current eye research.

[54]  J. Koenig,et al.  Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. IV. Comparison of in vivo spoilage with the in vitro adsorption of tear proteins. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[55]  P. K. Smith,et al.  Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. , 1985, Analytical biochemistry.

[56]  M A Lemp,et al.  Tear physiology and dry eyes. , 1977, Survey of ophthalmology.

[57]  R. Hancock,et al.  Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[58]  L. Michaud,et al.  Clinical discussion on the relative efficacy of 2 surfactant-containing lubricating agents in removing proteins during contact lens wear. , 2007, Optometry.

[59]  F. Stapleton,et al.  The Proinflammatory Cytokines and Arachidonic Acid Metabolites in Human Overnight Tears: Homeostatic Mechanisms , 2004, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[60]  C. Morris,et al.  Mass spectrometric techniques applied to the analysis of human tears: a focus on the peptide and protein constituents. , 2002, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[61]  D. Keith,et al.  A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. , 1997, Current Eye Research.

[62]  J. Tiffany Composition and biophysical properties of the tear film: knowledge and uncertainty. , 1994, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.